Anonymous
6/21/2025, 8:58:18 AM No.211777904
What age did he mean?
Replies:
Past a certain age, a woman without children can be a bad thing - /tv/ (#211777904) [Archived: 1155 hours ago]
Anonymous
6/21/2025, 9:17:58 AM No.211778389
Anonymous
6/21/2025, 9:19:44 AM No.211778441
>>211777921
fpbp
fpbp
Anonymous
6/21/2025, 9:20:04 AM No.211778451
Unironically people have been having kids in their 40s for decades.
However I'm a guy and in my mid to late 30s with no kids and I think one of the best times to have kids is in your mid 20s.
However I'm a guy and in my mid to late 30s with no kids and I think one of the best times to have kids is in your mid 20s.
Replies:
Anonymous
6/21/2025, 9:21:07 AM No.211778480
>>211777904 (OP)
The age is 24. In the past it might have been lower, but 24 is the cut off in 2025. If you're alone and living with your parents at 24 then you just fall behind massively every single day until you end up a late 20s loser, then a 30s loser, etc.
The age is 24. In the past it might have been lower, but 24 is the cut off in 2025. If you're alone and living with your parents at 24 then you just fall behind massively every single day until you end up a late 20s loser, then a 30s loser, etc.
Replies:
Anonymous
6/21/2025, 9:21:52 AM No.211778504
>>211777904 (OP)
27 is where you should stop using birth control with husband
27 is where you should stop using birth control with husband
Replies:
Anonymous
6/21/2025, 9:28:37 AM No.211778663
>>211778549
it's in the director's cut
it's in the director's cut
Anonymous
6/21/2025, 9:35:47 AM No.211778852
Replies:
Anonymous
6/21/2025, 9:36:20 AM No.211778863
Anonymous
6/21/2025, 9:46:44 AM No.211779123
>>211778852
Aren't there studies that show that waiting any longer than 30 for either of the parents increases risk of the child developing issues and what not?
Aren't there studies that show that waiting any longer than 30 for either of the parents increases risk of the child developing issues and what not?
Replies:
Anonymous
6/21/2025, 9:47:42 AM No.211779148
>>211778504
Yeah this is the best answer
Yeah this is the best answer
Anonymous
6/21/2025, 9:58:06 AM No.211779378
>>211778480
This is awful advice. I lived with my parents till I was 28. Saved 210K and paid off my student loans. My friends are swimming in debt and im looking to buy a house
This is awful advice. I lived with my parents till I was 28. Saved 210K and paid off my student loans. My friends are swimming in debt and im looking to buy a house
Anonymous
6/21/2025, 10:03:55 AM No.211779521
>>211778451
early forties if anything, but after forties for the women unless she is doing invitro fertilization or has some god tier genetics the baby will be suffering from health conditions
early forties if anything, but after forties for the women unless she is doing invitro fertilization or has some god tier genetics the baby will be suffering from health conditions
Anonymous
6/21/2025, 10:04:56 AM No.211779538
>>211779123
yes but the father is like 20% and the mother is 60%
yes but the father is like 20% and the mother is 60%
Anonymous
6/21/2025, 10:06:03 AM No.211779570
>>211777904 (OP)
There's no "certain age" for women. It's 35.
There's no "certain age" for women. It's 35.
Anonymous
6/21/2025, 10:08:23 AM No.211779614
>>211779123
The issue with that study is that it doesn't do differing ages for the couples. They have a 40+ couple and use the results for for male and female conclusions without having controlling pairs of say a 40+ year old man with a 20 something woman.
It's the woman. There's a reason a man can still produce a child past 40 whereas it's a monumental uphill battle for 90% of women.
The issue with that study is that it doesn't do differing ages for the couples. They have a 40+ couple and use the results for for male and female conclusions without having controlling pairs of say a 40+ year old man with a 20 something woman.
It's the woman. There's a reason a man can still produce a child past 40 whereas it's a monumental uphill battle for 90% of women.