IMG_6348
md5: 6aa294084cdc48ec68c0feed541e46e6
🔍
How much would you pay for a celebrity’s autograph?
Nothing. I have no use for such things.
Joe Bob Briggs autograph.
I mean I can buy it literally online.
That's it.
No one else is even as close to deserving of having the honor of giving me an autograph.
If prime Jennifer Connelly was offering to autograph my penis, then everything I have and more, just for the memory of her viewing my dick etched into my mind. Hell she probably wouldn't even have to touch the pen/sharpie to the skin and I would pay. She might not even have to do anything but just hear me offer, and I'd be happy to die right there and then.
>>211816804 (OP)Mark Hamill was a mistake.
I'd give Morena Baccarin whatever's in my wallet at the time to make an impression of her lipstick around the base of my penis
>>211816804 (OP)I really hate this piece of shit
>>211816804 (OP)Look, if I pay for one celebrity autograph, then I got to pay for all of them. Otherwise, I look like a jerk.
>>211816804 (OP)I wouldn't go up to a celebrity, so in this hypothetical scenario, for whatever reason I'm at a nerd convention and wait in their line.
I probably wouldn't ask for an autograph, I'd probably ask a weird and specific question about their lives I'd obviously spent way too much time pondering.
How much do they charge for that?
>>211817595Wait, I forgot.
I actually bought Corey in the House's autograph for my friend as a joke gift a month ago
$30 with shipping
>>211816804 (OP)Around a hundred dollars seems to be the going price at cons.
depends on how much I could sell it
less than 2 ROI is worthless
>>211816908>>211817059I was about to come into the thread and say zero but now I'm with these dudes
I got an autograph included with my Tommy Wiseau undies. My wife ordered them and asked Tommy to make the autograph out to me. He still made it out to her.
With that kind of oligophrenia, at least I can be confident that it's legitimately Tommy.
>>211817059This sounds totally acceptable depending on how much is in the wallet.
I wouldn't even pay for Hitler's autograph but I'd die for him. Why would I pay for anyone else's?
Why would I want someone's autograph? Especially an "actor". I don't get it.
>>211816804 (OP)If you have to pay for an autograph then it's not worth getting.
Hamill is probably the one whose return on investment could be worth the most. Because Star War collectables n stuff. I have a card if signed by Hamill would probably be worth a lot.
>Hamill was paid a base salary of approximately $650,000, which was significant for the time. More importantly, he and other principal actors, including Carrie Fisher and Harrison Ford, negotiated contracts that included a percentage of the film's profits—specifically, one-quarter of one percent (0.25%) of the movie’s total profits, covering box office returns, TV screenings, re-releases, and other revenue streams
Grok
Does he really need the extra money then? If this is right he would have steady income already.
>>211816804 (OP)I take the Roman approach to actors so absolutely nothing.
Though I would probably pay for certain things signed by historical figures. I think having an example of Isoroku Yamamoto's calligraphy for instance would be pretty cool.
>>211822883Sex with mark hamil, you're gross AF
>>211822862Not when you're dumbass like De Niro that had niggress wife that splashing his money or your finance manager swindles you like Al Pacino
Final Answer
Original Trilogy Profit Shares:
The Empire Strikes Back: ~$1,997,500.
Return of the Jedi: ~$1,618,750.
Total with A New Hope: ~$5,661,250.
Sequel Trilogy Earnings:
Likely salaries: ~$5–9 million total (hypothetical profit share: ~$6,098,750).
Total Career Earnings from Star Wars: ~$12.66–$14.66 million.
Should He Have Gotten More?: Yes, relative to the franchise’s billions in profits and merchandising, Hamill’s earnings were modest. A modern deal with merchandising royalties or higher profit shares could have been fairer, aligning with fan sentiment and his iconic role, but his compensation was reasonable for industry standards at the time.
>>211823050On further analysis we detect this is in fact real