It's weird to watch movies made between 2006-2014 and see them looking better in every way including better CGI, than modern movies.

How many times are you retards going to discuss the same thing over and over? Yes cgi used to look better in certain movies. There's nothin left to talk about.

We should talk about this fucking chud
>>211852069
I bet he only posts on /tv/

Rofl.

Same thing happened with games
Crisis and batman arkham knight look better than games released 10 years after

>>211852069
Godzilla 2014 is still one of the best looking films of all time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kElq8JvJ_Ys

>>211852184
Graphics peaked in 2016. I can't explain why but everything after that year looked worse.

>>211852029 (OP)
2001-2007/2008 was the real golden age of CGI. The technology advanced beyond previous decades and was still used by experts, unlike following decades. Films in the 2000s still used a lot of practical effects and only used CGI when needed, which meant the animators had more time to perfect their work. Nowadays everything is CGI was the setting to people to even the outfits.

>>211852029 (OP)
The third pirates movie was bad. In fact, only the first was ever good.

>>211852258
>Graphics peaked in 2016.

>>211852608
soulless

>>211852029 (OP)
>movies made between 2006-2014 and see them looking better in every way including better CGI
Annihilation
Aquaman
Avatar 2
Dune
Dune: Part 2
Mad Max: Fury Road
Rogue One
Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets

>>211852608

Witcher 3 from over a decade ago looked better.

>>211852868
Dune CGI unironically looks like shit in many places and that's no joke. Some other good ones there for sure though.

>>211853027
No.

>>211853027
lol

This thread gets made hourly.

>>211853042
>Dune CGI unironically looks like shit in many places
Not really.

>>211852184
>batman arkham knight
Yes but night and rain are cheating.

>>211853173
It's copy and paste soulless dogshit. Get some taste

>>211853434
>It's copy and paste soulless dogshit
Buzzwords.
>>211853434
>Get some taste
Like?

>>211852608
Looks gay as fuck

>>211852608
Xbox has NEVER shown the world fake graphics and then downgraded the fuck out of the retail build no not at all

pic rel is 2015

>>211853541
cant see anything

>>211853558
>microsoft is the developer
lol

>>211853559
Get your eyes checked then faggot

>>211853671
what impressed you here

>>211852029 (OP)
modern CGI is soulless jeetslop whereas earlier it was made by white men with passion and vision

>>211852258
for games most of it is art style. you can put 10 billion polygons in the model of an ugly sheboon and it will still be an ugly sheboon
for movies its because mid 2000s movies understood that cgi had limits and worked around those limits. for an even older example, jurassic park rarely shows the cgi dinosaurs in open well lit environments because the shadows and irregular surroundings mask the weirdness of the cgi. now literally everything is cgi'd in by some jeet or korean "studio" so it looks off because none of it is real and it triggers a subconscious reaction in you brain

>>211852184
DEI killed gaming, probably same with film

>>211853715
What impressed you here?

>>211854224
the tesselation and vegetation
meanwhile your image shows a grey wasteland and a skybox

>>211854270
Lol

>>211854270
>meanwhile your image shows a grey wasteland
Nobody tell him

>>211853541
bf1 looks so good bros

modern CGI only looks bad when it's done by pajeets and other DEI hires. That Godzilla film looked pretty good.

>>211853392
While that may be, Gotham Knights is also night and rainy but looks far worse. Can't even really use the
>WB montreal
excuse because Arkham Origins also looked good at the time.

>>211853541
BF1 is where gaming actually peaked.

>>211852029 (OP)
Back when your mom was in the business. Wild times brother!

>>211852608
I'm so fucking sick of every single game being released being cookie cutter UE5slop. You can always see that shit coming a mile away. Everything's over cluttered with a poor aesthetic direction, the same overelaborate lighting but unbelievably bad looking character models and even worse combat animations. Those parry and dodge animations looks like it could have been pulled straight from fucking Soul Reaver.

>>211855979
>Arkham Origins also looked good at the time
No.

>>211856291

>>211856555

>>211856599

>>211856034
>have chance to make memorable lasting movie like District 9
>torpedo it by shoving in ugly trailer trash band retards to shit up every scene promoting their music and acting like they're so awesome

>showing off cgi/graphics
>via static images
Are you all retarded?

>>211857231
>imageboard
>4MB file limit
Are you?

>>211857231
/tv/ zoomies think the way to judge cgi is to pause it, go through it frame by frame, and micro-analyze every pixel to see if it's "realistic". If they can't tell it's cgi, then it's acceptable. If there's even the slightest problem, then it's all 100% dogshit and some sort of video game graphics, which they are of course too good for!

>>211852069
Get a load of this newfag.

>>211857383
Even a short clip would be able to showcase visual fidelity far better

>>211857680
Wrong. It varies scene by scene anyway. A high resolution image displaying the style, which only rarely clashes with the motion, is totally sufficient.

>>211857514
I don't think zoomers care that much, it's what they grew up with after all.

>>211858062
>Wrong
>It varies scene by scene
How the fuck can you type that back to back? If it can vary then a video clip will demonstrate whether it works well within the scene.
>only rarely clashes with the motion
Getting a CGI object to look good and interact in motion with the world around it is one of the biggest challenges, but in a single frame even poorly done CGI can look good

>>211852608
I saw a white logo in the bottom right and thought this was an AI video.
The clips being a couple of seconds long and of extremely uninspired fantasy scenes where all faces are obscured agree.

That's how bad this was.

>>211854513
>we hadn't invented color so to tell each other apart the kaiser agreed to put spikes on his soldiers helmets
>now where was I?
>oh yes, WWI was known for handheld machineguns, blimps, constant fire, and afro-american soldiers

>>211858385
Hairsplitting nonsense.