Anonymous
6/23/2025, 8:08:41 PM No.211879894
I'm a white, straight, young male. Where should I get my news?
Replies:
Thread 211879894 - /tv/ [Archived: 932 hours ago]
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 8:14:18 PM No.211880106
>>211879894 (OP)
Did one (1) of these people condemn the Palestinian genocide or Israel's attack on Iran?
Did one (1) of these people condemn the Palestinian genocide or Israel's attack on Iran?
Replies:
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 8:15:11 PM No.211880144
I find Semafor pretty good
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 8:16:37 PM No.211880191
I like the Jacobin
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 8:16:42 PM No.211880194
>>211879894 (OP)
Every single one of these looneys is controlled opposition
Every single one of these looneys is controlled opposition
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 8:18:19 PM No.211880261
/tv/
If it's something actually important/big, people will spam it here, and the mods will actually start doing the job they signed up for in an attempt to censor discussion of it without showing they have a bias
If it's something actually important/big, people will spam it here, and the mods will actually start doing the job they signed up for in an attempt to censor discussion of it without showing they have a bias
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 8:19:52 PM No.211880307
>>211880106
>genocide
only applies to humans
I can't wait for the dailywire infighting to break out between israel supporters and isolationists. why hasn't shapiro and walsh gone at it yet?
>genocide
only applies to humans
I can't wait for the dailywire infighting to break out between israel supporters and isolationists. why hasn't shapiro and walsh gone at it yet?
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 8:21:54 PM No.211880367
>>211879894 (OP)
They're still pushing Reagan?
They're still pushing Reagan?
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 8:22:49 PM No.211880392
>>211879894 (OP)
I wonder whom of these are "truthful" here and who are there to build strawmen and use cherry picked identity politics to gain audience and perhaps wealth and fame. All of them?
I know first three, Peterson seems legit and truthful, but Walsh is obvious grifter, maybe and possibly an idiot. Ben is a sociopath. This I know.
I wonder whom of these are "truthful" here and who are there to build strawmen and use cherry picked identity politics to gain audience and perhaps wealth and fame. All of them?
I know first three, Peterson seems legit and truthful, but Walsh is obvious grifter, maybe and possibly an idiot. Ben is a sociopath. This I know.
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 8:23:27 PM No.211880409
>>211879894 (OP)
>Jordan Peterson
Total intellectual charlatan. Has substituted the same postmodernism he complained about in lieu of his religion's complete failure to provide physical proof of its claims.
>Matt Walsh
His life's work consists in expecting a question asked simply to have a simple answer. Someone should ask him "what is life" and see what he responds.
>Ben Shapiro
Bad faith conservative par excellence. Misrepresents studies, obfuscates, and gish gallops.
I don't know the rest.
>Jordan Peterson
Total intellectual charlatan. Has substituted the same postmodernism he complained about in lieu of his religion's complete failure to provide physical proof of its claims.
>Matt Walsh
His life's work consists in expecting a question asked simply to have a simple answer. Someone should ask him "what is life" and see what he responds.
>Ben Shapiro
Bad faith conservative par excellence. Misrepresents studies, obfuscates, and gish gallops.
I don't know the rest.
Replies:
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 8:24:47 PM No.211880454
>>211879894 (OP)
Mary > Bret > all other right wing grift girls
Mary > Bret > all other right wing grift girls
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 8:25:04 PM No.211880464
>>211879894 (OP)
Flashpoint on Victory channel
Flashpoint on Victory channel
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 8:26:34 PM No.211880507
>>211880409
>Someone should ask him "what is life" and see what he responds.
He would respond. As would anyone with above 80IQ. Yet your side cannot define what a woman is. Like a 50's computer when asked a simple riddle you completely break down.
>Someone should ask him "what is life" and see what he responds.
He would respond. As would anyone with above 80IQ. Yet your side cannot define what a woman is. Like a 50's computer when asked a simple riddle you completely break down.
Replies:
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 8:31:16 PM No.211880643
>>211880507
The definition of life is far from clear. There's no consensus on it. There are some traits that people think should be required like reproduction or adaptation but these are also present in inorganic or even unphysical things, like computer viruses or memes.
Even if you dislike that question try "what is consciousness", there are plenty of "what is" questions that can be simply asked but not simply answered, yet we continue to work with them anyway.
The definition of life is far from clear. There's no consensus on it. There are some traits that people think should be required like reproduction or adaptation but these are also present in inorganic or even unphysical things, like computer viruses or memes.
Even if you dislike that question try "what is consciousness", there are plenty of "what is" questions that can be simply asked but not simply answered, yet we continue to work with them anyway.
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 8:35:13 PM No.211880770
their singular agenda is to funnel money to Israel under the guise of conservative infotainment
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 8:39:06 PM No.211880909
journalism is dead you only get propaganda now
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 8:41:51 PM No.211881013
>>211879894 (OP)
Only 4chan + your cryptic dreams and delusions. It's what I do.
Only 4chan + your cryptic dreams and delusions. It's what I do.
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 8:56:04 PM No.211881561
>>211879894 (OP)
/pol/
/pol/
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 9:00:19 PM No.211881738
>>211879894 (OP)
Ground News
Ground News
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 9:03:34 PM No.211881864
https://youtu.be/Eevh7rbpZlw
It's ogre.
It's ogre.
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 9:06:45 PM No.211881993
>>211879894 (OP)
If you really and actually care about being informed then, as cliche as it sounds, you have to do your own research. It goes like this.
>hear about some event
>google
>click on news article
>ACTUALLY READ IT START TO FINISH
>oh wow that sounds crazy
>follow the sources of that article
>ACTUALLY READ THOSE TOO
Congratulations, now you know more than 90% of the total population about that specific event. You probably even know more than the guy who wrote that first article.
If you really and actually care about being informed then, as cliche as it sounds, you have to do your own research. It goes like this.
>hear about some event
>click on news article
>ACTUALLY READ IT START TO FINISH
>oh wow that sounds crazy
>follow the sources of that article
>ACTUALLY READ THOSE TOO
Congratulations, now you know more than 90% of the total population about that specific event. You probably even know more than the guy who wrote that first article.