https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2diHa2CxMu0

Moner is out, new Dora is in.

ANON NO FAPPING
ANON NO FAPPING
ANON NO FAPPING

Gooner no gooning

>>211883586 (OP)
Could be fun

Is the cover supposed to look like a cheap bollywood movie?

Boots looks hideous

>>211883586 (OP)
Doesn't look bad for a direct to streaming thing

>>211883586 (OP)
The new actress is friends with Dafne Keen. Hopefully she isn't a bad influence

Straight to the shitty star trek streaming platform

>>211883586 (OP)
She looks like shit.

Serious downgrade.

>>211885929
Moner no Moaning

Is she going to become Hollywood's new go-to latina?

>>211883586 (OP)
No Moner? No boner

>>211886095
Very bland face so unlikely.

>>211883586 (OP)
Why didn't they use Xocheese?

>>211886295
this is a no-budget TV movie

>>211886295
Dead "career"

>>211886095
Possibly. She has a new movie with Dafne Keen coming out

>>211883586 (OP)
>Moner is out, new Dora is in.
But why tho ? Moner was perfect

>>211886804
Too old now to play Dora

>>211886804
They waited too long to make a sequel and she aged out of the role

>>211886581
Are you retarded?

>>211886847
>>211887199
>>211886804
It isn't a sequel. It's just a Nickelodeon TV movie. They make a lot of them, they're cheap little things. Moner's movie was an actual theatrical release.

>>211886715
Nice

>>211887413
She hasn't been in a movie since 2022 anon. Her next role isn't until 2026 and its a supporting voice role

>>211887682
And yet I still would say she is out of the leagues of a TV movie on Nickelodeon.

>>211885929
true

>>211886095
Probably

How old is she? And she only looks half Latina…

>>211891331
18

>>211883586 (OP)
They already had the perfect Dora. Should have struck when the iron was hot and cranked out like 3 movies with Moner.

>>211892803
Wasn't the first only moderately successful? Given the marketing costs of a theatrical release it may not have been worth it.

>>211886095
Cute

>>211892803
>Dora seems committed to projecting a pre-sexualized version of youth, while throbbing unacknowledged beneath the surface is something a bit more real, its presence rigorously ignored. To be believed, this story should have been set in 1955.

>>211895381
i hate pseud movie critics so much. that was such an unnecessarily and overly elaborate way of saying
>hot teen make my peepee big

>>211886095
>>211886715
I do not enjoy shitting on young actresses, nor to disrespect the disabled, but she looks retarded in both of these. NOT MY DORA.

>>211895816
lol

>>211885929
Nice

Would Xochitl Gomez make a good Dora?

>>211885929
Why didn't she look like this in her Dora the Explorer movie?

>>211899483
It would have led to an r rating

>>211899483
It's a children's movie

>>211883586 (OP)
Looks ok