when did filmmaking become so cucked?
it's literally legal (in the US) and not to mention all of the 60s-70s euro films

what the fuck went wrong???

>>211884012 (OP)
chat is this true

>Amerimutts and yropoors are pedophiles
Cool

>>211884012 (OP)
Wait it’s illegal for children to see genitals in the UK?

>>211884012 (OP)
Why film it in the first place?

Oh so THAT’S how they filmed the child orgy scene in the It movie

>>211884295
A child who is employed on a movie set isnt allowed to see full frontal nudity

>>211884507
Because they needed to have a nude male infected running around

>>211884012 (OP)
chud law

>>211884012 (OP)
but the child is still looking at genitals, no?

>>211884796
but they arent real
no accidental on set erections and fellatio

>>211884796
A person wearing a large fake dildo that is painted to look exactly like large penis and ball sack doesn’t pose a threat to minors apparently

Why not just cast the nude character as female? That way no diddling will occur

>>211884012 (OP)
This movie with Keira Knightley probably wouldnt be allowed today:
https://thisvid.com/videos/laurence-fox-full-frontal-in-the-hole/

>>211885016
less so because the personal pleasure is less of an issue

>>211884295
Only on film sets. In girl's bathrooms it's ok.

>>211884796
No

>>211884012 (OP)
UK is overrun with pedos. they can't do it so openly anymore

>>211885016
of course it isn't, normal kids see more than that at pride parades every year and that's fine

>>211884012 (OP)
>what the fuck went wrong???
Whatever it is, Jim'll fix it

I don't get it. Are they afraid of turning the kid gay? But that's homophobic, innit?

It's really funny to me the excuse, like "but men, we HAD to make the kid watch the dick on camera! ;_; that was the scene we needed the dick right next to the kid, they robbed us... ;___;"
This fucking niggers are allergic to some creative directing, like fucking shooting at the kid first and the god damn dick later and composing

why is it anglos that have these retarded rules about nudity

That's an odd law especially if all it does is make kids look at realistic dildos and merkins while filming.

>>211885648
dunno, why are third world faggots obsessed with a term they don't even know the meaning of?

>of course it isn't, normal kids see more than that at pride parades every year and that's fine

>>211885519
Literally the retard breakfast scenario
>Imagine you have both actors separately...
>but they are both in the scene
>yes, but imagine they are both separate
>but they are together on the movie, I hired them

>>211885648
anglos are a strange bunch

>>211885648
>anglos

It's Americans. Americans are not anglo.

Can I make a 2 hours movie about a 10yo kid that watches and rates proathetic dicks all day?
The conflict is that he doesn't want to suck on them.
Climax is him sucking in them, resolution is him now being better rating them after he sucks them.
Dicks would be all prosthetic.
Catch of the film is the kid is rating futas, the dicks are all on rl women.

>>211885155
It's illegal there too unless you're Mohammed or Ngubu

>>211885816
This is a British law though

>>211885519
How would feral zombies wear clothes for 28 years

>>211885908
Most of the female zombies still have clothes

>>211885908
after 28 years
most zombies would even have flesh
you are talking about decomposing undead

>>211885972
are you seriously suggesting that zombie women should be shown naked you sick FUCK

>>211886173
with close ups on their nipples and labia
How fucking disgusting

>>211884796
I think that's what Boyle is getting at partially. That it's kind of retarded if the prosthetic dick is indistinguishable to a real dick.

>>211886173
Would be preferable to seeing giant zombie dongs. Also I feel like penises would be one of the first organs that would get damaged after several attacks on humans

>>211884012 (OP)
The kids aren't allowed to see the actors genitals for the purpose of a scene but they are allowed to see, touch and have the jewish director and producer's genitals inserted inside of them during casting and all throughout the production.

>>211884012 (OP)
why not cover them in cloth or clothing? why are jews like this ...

>>211886277
No, Ivan, that's also illegal.

>>211886252
a prosthetic dick is not a attached to a pervert that wants to show their dick to a child
what the fuck is wrong with people to think that its normal to desire showing your penis to children

reports of this giant dong make me want to see the movie much more tbqh

>>211886341
jews aren't "normal" by any stretch of the imagination

>>211884295
Not if their foreigners'. Very different than the US which only allows children to be molested by the chosen

>>211886277
They're allowed to go to pride parades and watch old men jerk off on the side walk. I guess you just need to have a rainbow flag somewhere nearby when you show kids genitals.

>>211886341
This antisemitism will not stand

>>211886337
>That's illegal

Tell that to the directors, casting department, producers and famous actors on set.

>>211886277
sure but they arent supposed to film you know

Why was that law passed in the first place?

>>211886664
people in hollywood want to show genitals to children

>>211884012 (OP)
>noooo why can't movie producers use their position to fuck kids anymore
your nose is showing, op

>>211886697
>can't take 10 seconds to read the OP
it's so they don't show them to children you stupid illiterate brown

>>211886711
showing big prop penises is totally not damaging to a child, they see that in UK pride parades

>>211886826
nigger you dont make prosthetics of genitals to look at if your intent wasnt to show genitals in the first place
they would use real ones if they could
so they compromised and said show them fake ones
the intent remains the same and nothing is said was wrong

>>211885815
She's as flat as an ironing board so she doesn't count

>>211884012 (OP)
paki alphazombiebros... his huge dong is fake, we can't cope enough now sirs

>>211886905
Literally just seeing genitals isn’t damaging at all. The problem is that sometimes child actors can be placed in situations with nude adult actors that can result in sexual harm to the child actor.

>>211884012 (OP)
Does this mean that loli and AI generated CP is fine in England? By the same logic it should be.

>>211886377
What about the catholic church which has a larger worldwide presence (especially in europe) and also which molests the most children?

>>211886905

>>211886905
britbongsisters, our response?

>>211885016
i would deliberately request a very small sized prosthetic penis and ballsack so the children on set would feel more comfortable

>>211887164
watch out, he's going to counter with "uhm ascksually school teachers molest more!"

>>211884012 (OP)
Wouldn't seeing fake genitals as your first time looking at that shit be in essence more degenerate than if they were natural? If your first sexual experience is entirely fake does that not presume later developmental issues? Seems like it would. My first rod came from cartoons, so now I get hard at cartoon porn on the regular because real shit just doesn't do it for me. Is that anecdotal? Sure it is, but this feels like someone in the film industry grooming someone through good intentions leading toward toward a divergent path.

>>211884012 (OP)
The fuck? I thought it nudity was normalized in that third world shithole? I

>>211885648
In this case, its because in the UK we need really strong anti noncing laws, otherwise people go way too hard with it (e.g. Savile)

>>211884012 (OP)

>>211888812
Did Dafne Keen pick the size?

>>211888861

>>211888812
That just looks like normal size anon

>>211888812
>All the alphas
It's the same fucking one in both scenes.

>>211888812
Let me guess, not a single female nipple to be seen throughout the whole film?

>>211889694
It's 2025