What the best Harry Potter move

Mine Azkaban or chamber

>>211899956 (OP)
which one was the era where she first started fucking harvey?

>>211899956 (OP)
I'm so glad I got to grow up watching this beauty on screen, the scene where she punched Malfoy in the face in POA awoke something in me as a child

>>211899956 (OP)
zoomer leia

>>211900069
you're thinking of that OTHER series about secret teenage witches, anon.

>>211900069
>Harvey got to do this with the real Emma Watson
not fair

>>211900113
nah. hate to break it to you, but emma ABSOLUTELY fucked harvey (many times) and it was most likely between ages 13-19

based and hebepilled

>>211901169
MODS

>>211900883
i know you meant Weinstein but i meant like, Sabrina

>pedo & fanfiction fags thread

>>211899956 (OP)
Philosopher's Stone because it was whimsical.
Having them all discover things in the wizard world and low stakes was nice. Then it got all teen drama and death every installment.

>What the best Harry Potter move
>Mine Azkaban or chamber

>>211899956 (OP)
Prisoner of Azkaban is the only one of the movies that felt like the books.

>>211901560
cringe

The best Harry Potter movie is Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2. Namely, because, at 130 minutes long, it has the shortest runtime of any of the films in the Harry Potter series, thus saving yourself any further exposure to the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though

"No!"

The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

>>211899956 (OP)
The correct answer is the first one but I have to admit that I've jerked off to her in the pink dress a bunch.

>>211899956 (OP)
Pink hoodie
Nuff said

>>211899956 (OP)
Fun fact: release order, in this case, correlates to quality.

>>211900830
Ummm sauce?

BASED AND HEBEPILLED

>>211902446
MODS

>>211902339
you didn't even try did you