Why are people pretending this looks bad?
I immediately saw this and thought this looks like a cool boss from an 90s vidya with a Giger-inspired artstyle, this is something you'd find in Metroid
Do /tv/ and /v/ really have such different aesthetic preferences?

>>211915054 (OP)
It looks bad because Jurassic Park is about DINOSAURS not Giger-monsters. Giant xenomorphs don't belong here.

>>211915054 (OP)
It looks so lazy and retarded.
>Can't come up with a definitive design for our new bigbad?
>Fuck it, throw your best ones together and we'll market it as a 'mutation' or put 'proto' in there
stupid panda virus killed the theaters anyway, the studios are making flops on purpose to get recompensated

You're a retard if you think people going to see a movie about dinosaurs want to see a "cool metroid monster".

>>211915054 (OP)
You should rope.

That thing looks like it has fetal alcohol syndrome.

>>211915124
>>211915130
It looks uncanny. Monsters being uncanny is good.

>>211915054 (OP)
So your IQ is sub-100 and your quality detection is based solely on image recognition. Good to know, fuck off back to playing slop on your Switch.

>>211915137
>Monsters
That's the problem, it's supposed to be about dinosaurs.

>>211915054 (OP)
Looks like a zombie T-Rex with scrotum on top of its head.

>>211915137
But it's not a monster though, is it?
That's the whole point of the first movie.

>>211915054 (OP)
A literal dickhead dinosaur.

>>211915137
You really are a stupid fuck.

>>211915054 (OP)
Big Slammu mogs him.

Jurassic Park fans were always split into 2 camps:
>Jurassic Park is about actual dinosaurs coming to life in the modern world
and
>Jurassic Park is about genetic frog monsters that just so happen to look like our preconceptions of dinosaurs
It seems to me that the Jurassic World movies were all made by the second camp and think it should be a horror movie about grotesque monsters.

>>211915404
Fuark yeah, Street Sharks! Jawesome!!!

Looks like instead of roaring he goes "Deeeeerrrrrhhhhh"

>>211915054 (OP)
Unsubtle antimale propaganda attempt. Cringe

>>211915530
>Yes, we call it the Incelosaurus Minimus
>It was so ugly he couldn't looksmatch with even deformed females, the males would often hurl themselves into lava lakes

>>211915224
Dinosaurs are monsters.
>>211915441
>Jurassic Park is about actual dinosaurs coming to life in the modern world
Like acid-spitting Dilophosaurus, a thing that never actually existed?

>>211915603
At least it’s body was based on the real thing

>>211915054 (OP)
apparently it is a failed hybrid for jurassic world(precursor to the indominous rex)
so the mutant thing they paraded around was a lie, it's a straight up hybrid
no dino fight at the end and this thing lives

>>211915441
Jurassic Park IS about dinosaurs coming to life in the modern world. The whole “actually they’re mutants with frog DNA” was a fan theory justification of why raptors didn’t have feathers like was eventually discovered after the first movie.

Crichton ALWAYS intended for the series to be about real dinosaurs and the books are very explicitly with this intent; Wu even wants to try genetically altering the dinosaurs to be more like public perception of them at the time, believing that the reality of dinosaurs might not mesh with the public’s idea of large lumbering beasts.

but THIS is the Incel-o-saurus

>>211915054 (OP)
Haha benis :D
Benisonheadosaurus :D

>Why are people pretending this looks bad?
because it does look bad
and given how shit the other 3 movies were this one will probably be shit too
why couldn't they have just left the original trilogy alone?

>>211916481
Nah, it's taking Grant at his word at the start of Jurassic Park 3 where he declares that the Jurassic Park dinosaurs are weird theme park monsters instead of real dinosaurs in addition to Jurassic World having Wu go into a rant about how none of the clones were natural.
By distancing the cloned dinosaurs from the real thing, it also means you don't have to update the old designs.

>>211917772
I like it because it looks different. The new movies are obvioisly creatively bankrupt and exist for the sake of themselves, so it's nice to see something that doesn't look generic as a small artistic victory for once.

>>211917796
It is also an extension of taking Grant at his word when we first see him in JP3; which flabbergasts me because his entire arc in that movie is re-learning that they AREN’T “genetically engineered theme park monsters”.

>>211915054 (OP)
>penis rex
I hate women so much

>>211915054 (OP)
Looks like shit

>>211915054 (OP)
Because it looks bad. Nobody wants to see a sperm whale with baby arms in their Jurassic movie.

>>211915054 (OP)

What's the name of that pseudo-dinosaur again? Distortus Rex? Anyway, it looks bad because it IS bad. The Jurassic Park franchise is about DINOSAURS, not fucking kaijus. Grant even makes a point of this in the first film when he says "They're not monsters Lex, they're just animals.". The Jurassic Park film franchise jumped the shark when it started creating its own fictional dinosaur species, starting with the first Jurassic World film.

It looks like they used Bella Ramsey's DNA as a catalyst to make this hybrid dinosaur looks so retarded

>>211920150
I'm sorry the producers didn't pay off some Jewish university to conduct a fake expidition and unearth the fake remains of the new hype dinosaur species they could put in the new movies. I'm sure you would've clapped and praised it then

That looks like an alien chestburster…

if they were gonna go with non realistic dinos they should have done chaos effect dinos like the toys

>>211920150
It is a dinosaur, its just a mutated fucked up one, like an inbred cat or something.

>>211916481
>Jurassic Park IS about dinosaurs coming to life in the modern world. The whole “actually they’re mutants with frog DNA” was a fan theory
The book is about the dangers of playing God with things you can't control and, incidentally, doing such for the sake of a good fiscal year. It's why, if you actually read the book, Crichton discusses consumer genetic products besides dinosaurs in a horror context. Where retards get it twisted is he used the then-current information on dinosaurs as a base level before perverting it with the characters' actions.
>Crichton ALWAYS intended for the series to be about real dinosaurs and the books
He only wrote a second book because Spielberg pressured him so much, that way The Lost World film could have a companion book to be "based on" and not appear as shallow a cash grab as it was.

>>211921380
Bold to assume I haven’t read the book MULTIPLE times including within the past year, back to back with The Lost World. And while yes, the main theme of the first book relates to a sort of Tower of Babel narrative, when it comes to portraying the dinosaurs, Crichton very much intended them to be the real deal within the narrative of the story. This is why there’s lots of background details specifically about the troubles the park experiences with the creatures both in their care and in their ability to live in a modern setting.

And yes, I’m aware that The Lost World was more of a “rush job” since Stevey Spiels begged Mikey Crite for another book to adapt. This is why the sequel retcons elements of the first book and never feels to care as much about scientific elements like the first - instead reading much more as a straightforward adventure novel. It is incredibly funny to me that TLW novel throws out the iconic “T. Rex can’t see you if you’re still” stuff from the first novel and film.

>>211915054 (OP)
>Is that a trex with a legged whale growing out of its back? Epic. Simply epic.

>>211915054 (OP)
What's the meaning of this shit?

>>211916481
>The whole “actually they’re mutants with frog DNA” was a fan theory
It's in the script of the first film

>>211915054 (OP)
Jurassic Park was great and felt real because they treated the dinosaurs like animals at a zoo. These new movies treat them like serial killer monsters. The writers should have their fingers broken.

>>211920150
>The Jurassic Park film franchise jumped the shark when it started creating its own fictional dinosaur species
So, 1998?

>>211915054 (OP)
That dinosaurs a dickhead

>>211921956
It's okay when they do it in my childhood

>>211915054 (OP)
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA LOOK AT THE TOP OF HIS HEAD

>>211915054 (OP)
I personally like the beluga inspiration, think the skull is a little too much T-rex for something obviously really deformed but I guess you have to make the connection obvious for audiences. Fucked up monsters is the logical route to go ever since JP3 when we found out Ingen was doing weird experiments and then the retcon about the spinosaurus being the first hybrid.
>>211915224
The dinosaurs were always things that walked a grey line between animals and monsters or something else depending on character perspective. The raptors were just directionless feral killing machines in the novels and movie and the most monster-like of the dinosaurs, in every case they're functionally just evil horror movie slasher villains. JP characters frequently have different takes on the creatures and there's multiple conversations about what the nature of them really is. Grant, Sattler, Sarah and Levine from the 2nd novel treat them like animals. Wu treats them like software and a means to enable his genetic research but not animals. They're just business assets and an ego trip for Hammond. Muldoon treats them like monsters because he works with the most monstrous dinosaurs in the park. The Lost World in both book and movie leans heavily towards them being sympathetic animals, while JP3 has a mixed bag of animal behavior and horror movie monsters. The sequel trilogy movies treat the dinosaurs more as animals on the whole, with the exception of the hybrids who are actually just monsters. The new movie seems to be taking them back to a more monster-like approach which is more inlign with the original story in my opinion.

>>211921956
yes, every installment in Jurassic Park other than the original movie is shit. The Lost World was literally written as a "Spaceballs 2: The Quest For More Money" joke

>>211915054 (OP)
That's just a rancor from Return of the Jedi

>>211915054 (OP)

>>211922666
Xweet that, Satan.

>>211915054 (OP)
>Downisaur

>>211915090
Well we did that all ready. Like how many more fucking dinosaur movies do you need? Change is good. Maybe you are the one who need to look in a mirror and update yourself.

>>211923959
>Like how many more fucking dinosaur movies do you need?
None, the first 3 Jurassic Park movies were MORE than enough. Jurassic World simply should not exist.
>Change is good.
False.

>>211915238
The whole point of the first movie is that they ARE NOT dinosaurs, they are genetically engineered monsters.

>>211916481
Dumb nigger, watch this scene https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ub3uoIsscSQ
They're not dinosaurs, they're genetically engineered chimeras, monsters.
>Crichton ALWAYS intended for the series to be about real dinosaurs and the books are very explicitly with this intent
If you read the book you'd know the scene you're referencing is Wu suggesting altering the park's animals to make them safer, Hammond saying that would mean they're not really dinosaurs, and Wu telling him they're not dinosaurs, they're genetically engineered monsters.

>>211915224
>>211915137
What’s worse is that the monster didn’t do anything in the movie. It appears at the start, and then randomly appears at the end. It’s not a constant or foreboding threat

Alien Resurrection all over again