Anonymous
6/24/2025, 7:24:19 PM No.211921937
28 Years Later makes no sense.
In 28 days later, the infected begin starving to death within weeks. They don't seem to drink or eat anything and just vomit blood. Speaking of which, how would they continue to infect more people without at least drinking water to replenish the blood they vomit out to infect others?
Ok, so in 28 weeks later, all the infected have starved, the UK is deserted. They begin moving people back into London City, what few thousands of people were expats or just outside of the country when the original outbreak happens as well as any survivors of the original outbreak. There's maybe tens of thousands of people on the entire Island when the second outbreak happens, we know that there are "carriers" who are infected but don't turn like Don's wife. Anyways there's a limited number of infected on the mainland, far less than there were during the original outbreak which they all starved to death.
We then see that the infected have spread to the mainland. So how did they contain it if they couldn't contain it on an Island? 28 years later just states they were able to and then quarantined the UK again. How? The UK would have only had a couple thousand infected on it at the outset of the second outbreak at best, whereas the mainland possibly had an outbreak in the millions if not more of infected running around France and western Europe. It just makes no sense. The premise of 28 years later that they need to quarantine the UK makes no sense when there was an outbreak likely FAR WORSE on the mainland. What are they quarantining? A few thousand infected which somehow survived 28 years later? Did these infected just not starve and started giving birth and infecting babies? Make it make sense. Awful premise for a movie that just completely retcons the previous movies entirely.
In 28 days later, the infected begin starving to death within weeks. They don't seem to drink or eat anything and just vomit blood. Speaking of which, how would they continue to infect more people without at least drinking water to replenish the blood they vomit out to infect others?
Ok, so in 28 weeks later, all the infected have starved, the UK is deserted. They begin moving people back into London City, what few thousands of people were expats or just outside of the country when the original outbreak happens as well as any survivors of the original outbreak. There's maybe tens of thousands of people on the entire Island when the second outbreak happens, we know that there are "carriers" who are infected but don't turn like Don's wife. Anyways there's a limited number of infected on the mainland, far less than there were during the original outbreak which they all starved to death.
We then see that the infected have spread to the mainland. So how did they contain it if they couldn't contain it on an Island? 28 years later just states they were able to and then quarantined the UK again. How? The UK would have only had a couple thousand infected on it at the outset of the second outbreak at best, whereas the mainland possibly had an outbreak in the millions if not more of infected running around France and western Europe. It just makes no sense. The premise of 28 years later that they need to quarantine the UK makes no sense when there was an outbreak likely FAR WORSE on the mainland. What are they quarantining? A few thousand infected which somehow survived 28 years later? Did these infected just not starve and started giving birth and infecting babies? Make it make sense. Awful premise for a movie that just completely retcons the previous movies entirely.
Replies:
