Did they really have auto panning cameras back in 1969?

>>212052779 (OP)
They left the 4th guy on the moon.

>>212052779 (OP)
>Did they really have auto panning cameras back in 1969?

Yes. They invested heavily in creating cameras that could cover pretty much every stage of the mission, so that way, when some shit blew the fuck up and they killed the entire crew, they would have some type of visual evidence of what caused it to go BOOM!

>>212052779 (OP)
the official line is the camera mount was on a timer and would trigger the panning 10 seconds after the booster was fired.

this in reality is complete bullshit as the booster ignition can never be that predictable and they would have had to set the timer hours before takeoff.

>>212052779 (OP)
>a camera...that moves??? FAKE

>>212052779 (OP)
Yes we have amazing cameras in the private sector and always have. Moon landing is fake though

>>212052779 (OP)
>the moon landing was fake!
>except for all the other ones of course

>>212052779 (OP)
reminder that the devious bastards at nasa didn't only fake a single moon landing, but rather they went on to perform their dastardly deed 5 more times. talk about pulling the wool over the publics eyes! we'll never know what really happened!

how did they transport the film from the camera back to Earth?

checkmate NASAfags

>>212053249
you must not go outside much, 80% of the population are stupid and easily fooled.

unless of course ....

>>212053110
>the booster ignition can never be that predictable
Proof? You're a rocket scientist so you'll surely be able to prove this bit of info that your entire argument rests on.

it was and still is easier to go to the moon than to set up this retarded nebulous conspiracy to no purpose
it's just trigonometry
the hard part was knowing whether we'd survive past the van allen belts, which it turns out we did

>>212053298
I'll dumb it down for you.
they dont set the booster ignition for "hey lets launch at 4pm!" they launch when an exhaustive checklist has been performed again and again and its good to go, its not an exact launch time.
so for them to set the timer of the camera panning and it to be EXACTLY on cue is just ridiculous.
you can look at hundreds of NASA launches to see the extensive checklist they have to go through, I'm not spoonfeediing you publicily available knowledge.

>>212053296
you dont go outside period

Dupes vs conspiritards leaves the whole world blind. There is no moon.

>>212053352
>no purpose
You really think there wasn't a purpose to going to the moon? How fucking stupid are you?

>>212053352
>it was and still is easier to go to the moon than to set up this retarded nebulous conspiracy
why do people keep repeating this dumb point?

>>212053296
and all because they wanted to sell the public rocks at an inflated price! here, buy this rock.. its not just a rock... its a moon rock! $100 please! the perfect plan and yet no one can see behind it. except you and me.

>>212052779 (OP)
How did they get the film though?

>>212053527
there is no purpose in a conspiracy
if NASA had believed it was impossible to actually go to the moon, they would've reasonably surmised it was impossible for the soviets too
not to mention saturn vs had already been used for both unmanned and manned missions so you either canvas your retarded conspiracy around those too or you try to explain why NASA built functional rockets for a fake

>>212052779 (OP)
In the race to the moon, the ussr reached a point where they knew they were not going to be able to get a cosmonaut there and back alive. So, the plan was just to get a guy there first a little before the USA astronauts, beat them to be the first, and then have him walk over to their landing site and ask for a ride home.

>>212052779 (OP)
Dude, don't ask questions. Just consume and obey.

>>212053654
The purpose was to showcase American superiority and power. This would then bring a sense of pride to civilians, which would help combat communism and make the Soviets look bad in comparison. So yes, there is purpose to going to the moon, even if you have to fake the entire thing.

>>212053654
to justify the billions of dollars in funding that actually went into creating and distributing crack cocaine and aids.

Man I can't believe there's all this evidence the moon landings were fake and the Soviets still fell for it. If only they had unemployed internet dwellers they would have seen through the lie.

>>212053397
Or they scheduled the exhaustive checklist too. And since they’d performed it so many times, knew the exact timeframe to complete the checklist, thus knew the exact launch time.

>>212053852
It had nothing to do with fooling the Russians. It was a Nazi Operation Paperclip psyop designed to distract American TV watchers and to slowly addict them to screens.
See also: the scene in Matrix 4 when Neo is in the elevator with a bunch of pod people on their phones.
You're a fucking robot Mr. Sarcasm.

>>212053852
I got you... governments are fake, The are the forward facing scapegoats of the family lines that have run the planet since before Rome rose.

>>212053927
Most of the “people” in the matrix were bots at that point, specifically designed to maximize the misery of what few people remained to suck the most energy out of them

>>212053654
the purpose is to remove God from the public, and to convince the masses to be cattle.

>>212053397
Just tie the switch for the camera into the appropriate stage of the ignition sequence. Me personally I'd have it run off the circuit that fires the explosive bolts.

>>212054068
And God didn’t do that… God didn’t want shamed passive cattle worshiping weeping martyrs…

>>212053110
but in actual reality you're a stupid fucking retard who doesnt know anything, talking out of your arsehole

>>212052779 (OP)
>>212053110
So did NASA intentionally pan the camera as a clue or did they just not realize it would betray thst the landing was fake?

>>212052779 (OP)
So you mean to tell me there's so little gravity on the moon that you can LAUNCH yourself out of its orbit with what looks to be the force of a Roman candle?

>>212054776
Yeah. It has 1/6th Earth's gravity and damn near no atmosphere. The amound of thrust needed to achieve escape velocity is lower by several orders of magnitutde.

>>212053397
Actually they timed it so the LM would meet up with the CSM in the correct orbit to perform a rendezvous. If they missed the launch time they would have to wait at least 2 hours for another chance.

>>212053110
how did they get the film to develop it afterwards, did it boost away too?

>>212053110
this was apollo 17, the previous attempt for apollo 15 there was no pan. apollo 16 fucked up the timing on the pan.
apollo 17 finally got it

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLlt9ZdCAfU

starts at 1:10

>>212053927
>>212054003
I would be hesitant to trust the word of anyone who actually decided to watch Matrix 4

>>212055383
i was getting ready to say the same thing. Moon deniers never know what footage theyre looking at lmao.

>>212055593
That movie is two parts schizo fever dream and one part “fuck the people who wanted this.”

>>212053110
the reason this clip is the one everyone sees is because it's the only one where the timing actually worked
every other one was too early or too late and the shot didn't work

>>212053711
Soviets would've known instantly if it was fake and called it out. But they accepted the defeat and congratulated US.

>>212053711
>The purpose was to showcase American superiority and power. This would then bring a sense of pride to civilians, which would help combat communism and make the Soviets look bad in comparison.
This is why everything went to shit after the end of the Cold War. With the big scary Soviets gone there's no more need for any of that.

>>212057774
No system can regulate itself.

>>212054068
But not you, you're special

>>212054228
They never have an answer to that

>>212052779 (OP)
>literally has all the gay corny hallmarks of AI slop video

>"today is finally the day I fool them XD"

nah, keep trying hamoosh

>>212054068
>the purpose is to remove God from the public, and to convince the masses to be cattle.
And pretending to travel to the moon was necessary to achieve this, because...?

>>212053397
All that is fake too

>this entire dead internet thread of trollfarmers and bots arguing with themselves for the singular express purpose of adding validity to obvious AI slop

your game is flagging, dirtworlders

>>212059503
This. The lander morphs into a star trek ship at 0:08.

https://apolloinrealtime.org/17/

>>212056222
im certain most of them think we only went to the moon one time ever

>>212059705
yep

>>212053679
Good one Dad

>>212053397
it was radio controller by an operator in houston, its that simple. that tech existed since 1898

>>212059915
Fendell, specifically. he had note with the t- times for when to do which commands to the camera. since the camera's motion was delayed by like 7 seconds

>>212059915
>it was radio controller by an operator in houston, its that simple.
It takes 8 minutes for radio waves to travel from the Moon to the Earth dumb fuck

>>212060020
can't tell if shitty troll or idiot. or did they chance c when I wasn't looking

>>212059742
Look it up... it was one of the Russian plans for beating us there.

>>212059742
You joke but I might be your dad. I used to fuck a lot of ugly stupid women.

>>212052779 (OP)
No they were controlled back from earth compensating the delay which they fucked up on earlier missions.

>>212056452
>Soviets call it fake
>Americans laugh as the US media & newspapers all make fun of the Soviets for being mad they lost the space race
Yeah, it would have just stoked the anti-Soviet/communist sentiment.

>>212057774
There's no big bad to come together against. US had it in 2001 because of 9/11 and then again with occupy Wall Street. Since then, everybody has bought into the jew plan of being divided and hating groups instead of hating the right people. Glad people are now waking up and everyone except boomers now hates Israel. Really bringing us together in some way.

There is a fantastic documentary called American Moon that goes over all the yes and no's on whether we should trust the American government or not.
>how come there is no radiation damage on any of the footage?
Let's have our expert fact checkers debunk these insane conspiracy theories and check out the original footage.
>WHERE IS THE ORIGINAL MOON LANDING FOOTAGE? OH WAIT ITS GONE SORRY FOLKS WE LOST THE MOST IMPORTANT FOOTAGE OF HISTORY

>>212063836
I know you're a troll, but we do have footage of A11 though https://apolloinrealtime.org/11/?t=102:27:55

plus 12, 14, 15, 16, 17....

>>212052779 (OP)
So if the astronauts are sitting on top of the engine how come you can't hear it over them talking?

>>212053397
>its not an exact launch time.
when you're rendezvousing with a moving object millions of miles away, using a finite amount of fuel, it absolutely is an exact launch time.

>>212052896
lol watching you defend this ridiculous bullshit is so sad

>>212053352
>the hard part was knowing whether we'd survive past the van allen belts, which it turns out we did
How? What changed?
What was implemented to get around this giant obstacle?
>nothing!
>it all went off without a hitch despite compounding failures and every boss in the apollo program quitting months before the "landing"

I hope you are all trolls, god damn what a shithole of a site this is

>>212052779 (OP)
Admittedly they faked that shot. But the rest was real.

>>212052779 (OP)
>300 ton+ launch vehicle
>accelerates 100+ ton upper stage to 27000mph to achieve orbit
>make tranlunar burn and travel a quarter million miles to moon
>undock with service module
>lands on the moon using avionic computers running recognizable operating system concepts invented specifically for these handful of missions

>can't pan a camera on a timer

>>212064514
This board in particular is the dregs of Twitter and Facebook combined
The posts in this thread are exactly the same as those under any FB reel
absolute retardation

>>212052779 (OP)
Fun Fact: You can see Stanley Kubrick shadow reflecting off the "Moon"

>>212064598
but why the movies board. I like movies. why can't they all go to like /b/ or something.

>>212052779 (OP)
From 1969. From 1972. Remote controlled via radio. The three previous attempts to get this shot failed because the camera was in the wrong spot or the timing was wrong

>>212052779 (OP)
The moon landing was faked inside of a hangar in Area 51, they fake space exploration there. It's so obvious.

>>212060020
A little under 3 seconds

>>212064640
Lack of moderation, and Hiro never gave a fuck as long as the clicks keep coming
the rules don't match the content so don't look for consistency
it's even worse than reddit, just streetshitters, bots and retards

>>212053261
WiFi dumbasss!

>>212053352
Yes. That's exactly why they are trying and cannot go back. wtf is nasa doing when they can't even go back to the moon.

>>212064757
It takes 3 seconds to send a radio signal coast-to-coast. Earth to moon is ~8 min.

>>212065229
We can go back and have... there is just no reason to do so manned. Shits expensive, and the return on the investment is not worth it. It will be soon due to Helium 3, but most of you are retards so it is not worth talking about.

>>212065968
Faggot quite down with your Reddit response. NASA was created by NAZI with operation paper clip. NASA hasn't done shit since faking the moon landing. Elon was the one who saved those stranded astronauts. NASA is a money laundering scheme.

>>212059541
if we are in a closed system then there is neccessarily someone on the outside who set it up.

>>212052779 (OP)
I’m not a moon landing denier but it does look fake as fuck

>>212052896
Plus they used filmless cameras that broadcast instead of record. The recording was done on earth.

>>212054284
Why would anyone fake something as elaborate as the moon landing 6 times?

>>212065968
>there is just no reason to do so manned
This. Everything manned just increases the complexity and risk exponentially higher all for the same result of just looking around, recording stuff and taking samples, which can all be done with drones and probes. Drones don't need to worry about minimal g forces, atrophy, food, air, etc. They'll eventually want to make a manned moon base though likely as a staging point for missions further out into the solar system which won't have to start from the heavier gravity well

>>212066270
It is great that you believe you are a party to hidden truth... you fucking paranoid delusional shithead.

>>212065229
No funding. You keep voting for people who cut it.

>>212063980
He’s talking about the original magnetic tapes they used to record the radio broadcast video of the moon landing. The idea they used traditional film to record everything and then brought it back is one of the facets of the theory.

>>212064474
The Van Allen belts are a barrier because of the current reliance upon microcircuitry, gamma ray in the wrong place means fried computer and/or electrical fire. The amount of shielding necessary to reduce that chance to zero is Zeno’s paradox tier, exponentially increasing for every half and never reaching zero.

The Apollo missions used this, which is less powerful than a calculator watch from the 90s.

>>212065229
The cubit built the pyramids, the slide rule put men on the moon, the smartphone has men cutting off their dicks to be “women.”

>>212055076
they tied a long fishing line to the the camera and reeled it in

>>212067402
Connecting every human on the planet was a horrible idea. Acting like every voice was sane, rational, equal, and worth listening to was a HUGE mistake.

>>212052779 (OP)
It was a scale model. proably about 1:8 or 1:6.
It was filmed upside down. The module descends by gravity along a wire. Flipping the negative gives the illusion is was rising. To those who believe you see the astronauts enter before hand: that was another elaborate set-up involving forced perspective and matte painting. There is an gap in the broadcast between the shots and comparing both set ups shows they are different.

>>212067577
Quick access to fact checking alone makes it worthwhile. Only those that want to lie about shit and get away with it fear progress.

>>212067577
It’s an evolutionary filter. Alphas and younger zoomers have a built in bullshit filter.

>>212067777
You'd think so right? Yet it hasn't really worked out well. The age of disinformation is stronger than ever. Bad actors are incentivized to flood the space with false info, half truths, and scams so the real truth can't be discerned. Then they can also point at the real truth and say it's fake news just like all the others. And millions fall for it.

>>212068101
It has worked out VERY well. I run into less and less world champs and special forces opperatives every day.

>>212066597
To use the funding for something else of course

>>212061761
Not me. My mom was a smoke show in the 80s

>>212068101
disinformation, half truths, scams, etc, only work on people who've never been exposed to them. insanity can't take hold in the mind of someone regularly exposed to it. "protecting" people from such things and/or avoiding them completely makes people more sensitive to them. we've got trannies now, but its been a while since there's been a genuine jonestown level cult, as people just don't fall for that shit anymore. the causal factor of trannies is autism anyway, so there's no real helping those people nor is there much reason to.

>>212068544
it would've cost more to fake the moon landings than it did to actually go to the moon. most of US industry was part of the supply lines that built the apollo missions.

>>212068638
They could have gone to the Moon with the flying saucer technology they figuring out

>>212068544
You do realize that they can say the money goes wherever they want, right? They do not need to have any cover story. You are not even informed how your tax bracket differs from others, exactly how much is actually collected and where those funds are applied. The government self reports and is accountable only to themselves about the data they allow to be distributed. Meanwhile you are taxed on each dollar you earn, taxed again when you spend it, and potentially imprisoned for any accountancy error at your end as if you willfully stole something from the IRS.

>>212068849
*were

>>212052779 (OP)
That wasn't 1969, it was 1972 for Apollo 17. Here's what Google's AI tells me.

------
Here's how it worked:

Remote Control: A camera operator on Earth, named Ed Fendell, controlled the LRV's camera remotely from mission control in Houston.
Anticipation and Calculation: Fendell had to anticipate the timing of the lunar module's lift-off and its rate of ascent. He used these calculations to determine where to park the LRV camera and when to begin tilting it upwards.
Manual Tracking: Because of the communication delay to the Moon, Fendell had to initiate the camera's upward movement several seconds before the lunar module actually lifted off to ensure the camera tracked it properly.

Previous attempts:

Attempts to film the ascent during Apollo 15 and 16 were unsuccessful due to technical issues (Apollo 15 camera motor burnout) and improper positioning (Apollo 16 LRV not parked correctly).

Regarding Apollo 11:

The famous footage of Neil Armstrong's first steps was captured by a camera mounted on the Lunar Module's descent stage and pointed towards the ladder.
The camera's signal was transmitted to Earth and converted into a broadcast format.

Note: The Apollo 17 ascent was successfully filmed by remote control, and the iconic footage is often seen today.

----------

Here's a website full of documentation on how the moon missions functioned, including the how the communications systems worked.

https://www.nasa.gov/history/alsj/main.html

>>212069420
people will tell you it was impossible for a many unreasoned reasons... ask them to explain to you how signal decoding works to produce an image on a tv screen and you will understand they live fully in a world of magic and make believe.

>>212055383
based knower

>>212060020
>It takes 8 minutes for radio waves to travel from the Moon to the Earth dumb fuck
How if Radio is almost like light, as it's a form of radiation? It takes 7 minutes for light to travel from the Sun to the Earth, why would it take longer to travel from the Moon to the earth?

>>212069531
one fucker on twitter asked me "how did they communicate from the command module to Earth, did they drop a phone line?". They don't want to find out.

>>212053110
Why didn't they sell this technology to Hollywood?

>>212069665
they did! Kubrick used Nasa cameras to capture candlelit sets for Barry Lyndon.

>>212069581
You think they are alike because they both present as waveforms? Radio (electromagnetic) transmission speed is determined more by the capabilities of the transmitter, the reciever and the antennas than it is distance. It is not comparable to light when we are talking about set speeds.

>>212069827
ah ok, so how did you arrive at the 8 minute calculation exactly? Radio waves travel at the speed of light in a vacuum, which space definitely is. They had an antenna set up on the moon, which bounced radio waves to the command module orbiting, which bounced radio waves to the earth. How fast do you think those waves were going, and why would they take longer to go from the moon to the earth than they would from the sun to the earth?

>>212069965
Due to the limitations of the transmitter, reciever, antennas, and then finally distance and medium of transmission in that order of importance. Not that anon with the 8 min calculation. That was nasa's doing in the construction of their equipment

>>212069827
I'm willing to be corrected, but here's what i read a while back on the communications system. S Band is used by aircraft and space vehicles to this day for communication.
https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/static/history/alsj/ElecWorld-Aug69-low.pdf

But please, I can always learn more about this, tell me what you know.

>>212070078
What limitations were there in the near vacuum of space? Surely this would've been one of the first things they tested when they sent other apollo missions to the moon before the landing of apollo 11?

>>212070305
I am learning as I go myself big guy. Transmission and decoding are fairly new fields of study for me. Jack of all trades mistake over here. I know just enough to be dangerous to everyone around me without meanig to.

>>212069581
>It takes 7 minutes for light to travel from the Sun to the Earth, why would it take longer to travel from the Moon to the earth?
Can you really not figure this out? The Moon is further away from the Earth than the Sun is.

Why is this theory so prevalent in muttland? I thought you guys were patriots and proud of your country, but the one time you guys do something great 10% of the population doesnt believe it kek

>>212070436
Mostly it has to do with getting the reception between transmitter and reciever aligned across that distance. Antennas are cool, but not great.

What I am emplying was knowing all variables, the equipment nasa employed was designed by nasa to preform within a constant set delay that they could tune into for clear signal transmission. The feed was constant, but only clear within that window. To send and recieve accurately took 8 min, which is where that figure comes from.

>>212053110
>booster ignition can never be that predictable
it's not a fucking solid rocket booster, the lunar ascent stage used a hypergolic rocket, it just shot streams of hydrazine and nitrogen tetroxide together in to the thruster bell and they would instantly ignite when mixed

>>212071006
ping pong ching chong.

>>212052779 (OP)
They phoned the president, on prime time hours, FROM THE FUCKING MOON, but I can't watch a 1080p video without stuttering like crazy.

>>212052779 (OP)
Kubrick's best work

>>212071051
That is because you steal wifi off someone who is only slightly less poor than you are. Not NASA's doing.

>>212053991
>the family lines that have run the planet since before Rome rose
Tell me more. Unironically. Is this the ''Black Nobility''?

>>212070581
Apollo Unified S-Band Transponder is what they used to communicate with earth after a certain point. Yeh and I can't claim I know everything either, i'm always willing to be corrected

>>212071123
DAS RITE!!!

>>212066597
Funny how they can't go back now that we have 8k 1000fps cameras...

>>212052779 (OP)
>Yeah we totally went to the moon we just haven't been able to do it again in 55 years.. Were going back.. But it's..IT'S JUST COMPLICATED okay?

>>212071316
>can't go back now that they don't have an unlimited budget and endless supply of competent engineers
ftfy

>>212071123
Rome never fell, it just transformed into a church. The famlies that have most shaped the world are the Hapsbergs, Rothschilds, and a couple others than have dynasties that can be charted backwards beyond our current calander. You will only find out exactly as much as they want you to know if you look into it. If I had anything interesting to add to it that I could share with you, I would already be dead.

>>212054068
then why have one of the astronauts on the moon mission be a minister who took the eucharist on board the capsule?

>>212071399
so at least one young boy could sleep safe that night.

>>212070959
Ahhh ok, that makes sense then, but why would it be 8 minutes when accounting for all the variables? Looking at the transcript, it seems like there was only a 3 second or so delay between communications.

https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/static/history/alsj/a11/AS11_TEC.PDF

CC is command center and CMP is the Command module pilot.

>>212071470
They built the recievers and the thee transmitters and the whole kit. 8 min was likely the most sure fire range they could hit, and all of this was done by math nerds with a near limitless budget when it came to beating the russians.

>>212071554
The receivers and transmittors were built by a combination of different electronics companies. Is that what you mean? Not being condescending because I don't know myself but do you know how the Apollo Unified S-Band Transponder worked?

>>212071554
the shit they did with pen and paper is astounding

>>212052779 (OP)
Don't be silly, literally everything went perfectly the first time it was ever done and it just happens to look like shitty 60's special effects and you can't see stars on the moon.

>>212065229
I'm sure they could have gone to the moon, but instead they hired space x to develop some different type of rocket stuff which they haven't yet delivered in working state if they ever will.
Not sure if I remember right but might have been last year when they were supposed to be already doing unmanned landing on moon.
But last I checked they could barely keep the rockets from exploding at launch

>>212059541
because it proved to the world our system and country was the superior way of life

>>212065968
> It will be soon due to Helium 3, but most of you are retards
Lunar helium 3 is too dilute to be economic and you can make it cheaper here

>>212073542
China put first man on moon using a chair and fireworks. They denied this was a hoax for around 800 years and it was fairly widely accepted throughout Asia.

>>212073658
I was not aware of that, but the moon in general is a mining opertunity that will eventually meet up with scientific development to be exploited.

>>212064640
why would this thread bother you? try not to hate people's fun so much its a miserable way to live

>>212053852

Considering how much the Soviets cheated, lied and faked their stuff, and then got caught years later on all of it, it shows NASA being able to fake moonlandings would be the greatest achievement humanity has ever done.

>>212052779 (OP)
The LM-CSM rendezvous is one of the biggest giveaways of the preposterous moon landing hoax.

The CSM orbited the moon at over 5,000 mph.

That tiny LM had almost no maneuvering capability and limited thrust and fuel, along with minimal sensors to determine position relative to CSM. Yet somehow it launched, flew blind and docked with a bullet orbiting the moon, where a fucking millisecond of error means the LM flies into space or crashes into the CSM and kills everyone.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>212073130
the artemis project, they sent an unmanned rocket to orbit the moon already

How did they compensate for the 3 body problem?

>>212064537

Anon, there are smooth brains on this board who have no idea we had radars on airplanes even during WW2. People have trouble understanding the actual techtree tiers humanity has had in use.

So will the Chinese be the first or second on the Moon or will they fake it too? Is there a Stanrey Kublick over there working on it right now?

>>212053110
How did they recover the footage from the camera? Was it set to automatically broadcast back to earth? If this was a film camera someone would need to take the reel of film out and scan it

>>212074049
Kublick died while filming Eyes Narrow Open

>>212053352
>No purpose
It was set up so we could dab on the soviet union and make America look like an unstoppable force. Re-moralize the citizens while demoralizing the enemy. Makes sense to me

>>212053110
They had to get into lunar orbit at a particular time and therefore launch at a particular time, so it was already preset.
>>212054776
The fuel burns invisibly with no atmosphere. They only needed like 100 cubic feet of fuel storage to launch, which is much less than the crew cabin size.

>>212074001
Nightvision was kino

>>212065229
the only reason the US went to the moon was to stick it to the Soviets. once the pissing contest was over, nobody ever gave two fucks about going back to the moon

>>212072590
>you can't see stars on the moon
wouldn't the camera adjusting to the light exposure from the surface of the moon hypercontrast away things like stars

>>212071051
>They phoned the president, on prime time hours, FROM THE FUCKING MOON
zoom zoom has world rocked by very basic analog technology
>I can't watch a 1080p video without stuttering like crazy
lolpoor

>>212072590
..it took them 6 moon landings to get the panning camera shot, but hey who ever said you had to know even a single thing about the moon landings to be a conspiracy theorist?

>>212075065
fun fact the roooover stayed alive for some time after A17's liftoff, and they pointed it at the expected location of the LM's eventual impact point, but it didn't capture anything as it was just a tad too far away :(

>>212072590
Ever stood on a football field lit by spotlight on a starry night? What am I saying, you've never been outside!

>>212075117
the fact that they couldn't film it is the ultimate proof that it was faked! how come the lunar lander didn't come back down?? And if they had, that would also be the ultimate proof that it was faked! How could they possibly get such an unlikely shot??

>>212075117
>expected location of the LM's eventual impact point
Sounds like bs. The LM would be in lunar orbit for a long while (weeks or months) before the mascons got it

>>212052779 (OP)
They attached a fushing line to the cameras lense so it would track them and them be pulled up with them

>>212052779 (OP)
Ppl actually believe this is real?? Hahahaha
Next you're gonna tell me how 2 planes can demolish 3 buildings to rubble.

>>212075319
It was deorbited with its remaining fuel immediately after they decoupled from it, so as not to leave it as space junk

>>212075323
>fishing line

cool fact, you can see Venus in this A16 pic. Look just above-left of the 2nd down, rightmost registration mark. Small bright dot.

>>212052896
Lol shut the fuck up. Stupid shill.

>>212075480
>Look just above-left of the 2nd down, rightmost registration mark.
Yeah I'm stupid. That doesn't make any sense to me.

>>212075702
sorry, I didn't explain it well.

>>212056222
> Moon deniers

Just as bad as the "flat Earthers".

>>212075795
Neat thanks!

>>212075881
same retards, for the most part

>>212075881
Globies like you are just retards.

>>212075480
Nice.

>>212066270
>Faggot quite down with your Reddit response
conspiratards cannot spell to save their lives. Lol.