28 days later is anti-white propaganda. Wake up
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=h3qxr6VVqtM

>>212101839 (OP)
I don't watch movies that show penis because I'm not a fag.

vampires have always been about animalistic lust. not watching your stupid 'video essay'.

Almost all western movies are anti white. This is what white cucks fight for in their wars.

>>212102613
That's 28 years later

>anon wants to be a breadtuber

>>212102712
>posts a subversive libtard jew
The irony

Not a single white in burgerland aside from European tourists. I don't want to hear your mutt cope

>>212102685
Speaking of westerns! Once upon a time in the West is also anti white
https://youtu.be/d4wjQT2hkbA?si=p25FPqO7iYqbtAbR

>>212102920
Keep up your education of ignorant anons. People who seethe at you are also anti white and love mass immigration for white countries.

>>212101839 (OP)
This is worth clicking just because one of the movie writers is in the comments raging against wokeness, he even quotes
>when the saxon began to hate

I ain't watch your vid though; I knew it was antiwhite at 16, I don't need a lecture on it now.

It’s actually the opposite, zombie horror is reaction to disappearance of ethnicity and wielding a common language.
The zombies are an existential threat like foreign tribes, which obviously can’t talk, the path to controlling or protecting against them is clear.
But the linguistic horror the survivors experience is realizing how little they have in common with each other and how ultimately the group will falter against the pressure of the zombies.

>>212103711
this is true though. really dont want to test us

>>212101839 (OP)
Worked on me then because I detest myself and other whites.

>>212102686
The original has dude on a hospital bed with his dick out, retard.

>>212101839 (OP)
Wyatt Stagg is anti-white propaganda trying to convince white people that they shouldn't have children until they've taken back Hollywood.

>>212103942
How come?

>>212101839 (OP)
This guy blocked me on twitter for pointing out factual errors in his videos and saying he has no idea how filmmaking or the artistic process work. And I kicked his ass in the comments of his last video.

He's just *wrong* about a lot of things in this video, and selectively editing and presenting sequences to fuck with how they appear in the film. But I don't even think he's deliberately dishonest. He's just so desperate to believe he's being cucked, humiliated, and is helpless at all times that he feels an insane drive to interpret everything he can as his own domination.

>>212103293
The movie has one writer, Alex Garland. And I don't think he's in the comments. I can't find him anyway.

>>212103942
I could believe that Wyatt Stagg is run out of a police station or something, like those twitter 'defend evropa' accounts that just cry, plead helplessness, and post videos of whites being brutalised by non-whites, as a way to corral and pen anti-libtard sentiments into cages and dead-ends. Because Stagg speaks from the perspective of an insane loser so utterly dominated by reality that all he can do is stand and gape at how hard he is being *subverted*. And I suppose he wants you to join him or something.

I've argued with this guy 1-1, he's a deeply stupid, cretinous person either way.

>>212104394
Show the twitter discussion then

>>212104487
I privated my account in disgust recently. I'd just go and get myself in trouble with how much that site turns my thoughts violent. You might be able to find me in the comments under his Gattaca video. I'm the one asking him "Wyatt, did you ever hear the one about the man with the hammer?".

I actually screenshotted *that* exchange to show my friends because youtube comments are a clusterfuck and tend to self-erase and they were having trouble finding it. And he engaged with me a lot more. On twitter he panicked and blocked me almost immediately.

The days interpretation is very absurd just on its face, the idea of the "rage virus" being nativist rage resting on absolutely nothing despite holding up the entire video. His attempts at linking things back to it are all desperately strained. Like, important error, his misinterpretation of Selena's account of the outbreak. He hears that it started in the market towns and the countryside, like nativist sentiment. But that's not what Selena says. She says there was violence in country towns, and that's how they knew it wasn't ordinary riots as the news were trying to say. Because those are places you do not get riots and street demonstrations. That's just a basic failure to read the on its face information coded into straightforward human communication because Wyatt is so utterly devoted to finding another ways the jews are raping him in literally everything he encounters.

The violence was in the country and out of cities *in addition to the cities*, meaning it was irregular and not fitted to the pattern of riots and urban unrest. Try explaining this to Wyatt and he'll tell you I'm posting from Tel Aviv, or that I am an afraid bluepilled cuck afraid of confronting disagreement or challenging ideas (he blocked *me*).

>>212103757
That's surveillance footage of me at the hospital

>>212104730
Ok but that's literally like one error

>>212104939
It's a pretty fucking devastating one and a clear example of strained thinking. Ultimately this is like disproving the Silent Hill Circumcision Theory guy. This isn't math. I can't get out my abacus. I can just point out how much wool, faith, and strain is required to make his read work, while mine is very clear, easy, and backed up by everything. Look at the kind of person Wyatt is and look at how I write. I don't get on the retard-pulpit of youtube looking for passive rubes easily impressed by spooky music and monotonous *authoritative* tones made by mumbling super close to the microphone to pretend I have a deep voice.

I like written words. Which one of us do you think is used to being challenged and scrutinised? Do I sound unreasonable to you?

The best case we can make against this kind of subjective theorycraft is asking how it got into the movie. Wyatt goes completely to pieces on these questions and will probably block you if you ask. Is it intentional, or unconscious? The answer is, whatever he can get away with. His tone and presentation is obviously *sinister conspiracy theory* but then if you point out the words and actions of Boyle and Garland and ask for that to be squared with the state of the film, he will direct you to generalised statements on the power of unconscious motivations. His explanation becoming an infinitely weaker "in their hearts all filmmakers are unconscious hyperhardcore christian zionist white-replacementists".

Do unconscious drives get expressed in art? Absolutely. But even this begs investigation into the nature, history, and character of the artists in questions. What should utterly discredit Wyatt if you have any appreciation of art is his utter disinterest in artists. He doesn't even understand why they should be relevant and interprets questions about them as misdirection. He doesn't say it, but again his revealed belief is that movies are made by "hollywood". They're a product of one monolithic force. Idiot.

>>212104154
The recurring theme in all his videos is that "the myth of the white man must live again before the white man can live again." Which is putting the cart before the horse. He's just another impotent loser making up excuses to not start a white family.

If you actually care about white people then you'll stop watching YouTube essayists and make some white babies.

>>212104394
Hollywood has been famously pro white and you’re definitely not an anti white Redditor.

>>212105261
Anon, show me how quick you can use google. Tell me what country Danny Boyle and Alex Garland are from.

>>212103757
We don't sign our posts here.

>>212105306
Ok? The uk literally has government ads that only push race mixing. Your point in meaningless.

>>212105134
Pretty easy to put it into the movie, the writer, the director or simply the producer simply puts it in without explaining (or tells someone to put it in)
They always say this about stuff like masonic imagery. "Well, jee... lots of people work on a film, so therefore they would all need to know the exact purpose behind the imagery if they are putting it in,) but they don't, the director simply needs to give an instruction for putting something in, perhaps give a vague and bullshit answer for it, and the workers on the film won't give it a second thought. The same thing happens with the themes that Wyatt tries to detect. There is also the aspect of unconscious drives as well.

In regards to Boyle, I would like you to take a look at this video of the 2012 opening olympics which he directed. Perhaps you could discern the meaning of it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=voBrCQEOpjY

>here's your "anti-white" film

>>212102767
The prequels still suck btw.

>>212101839 (OP)
White people and culture is le bad.

>>212103711
How about brown people just stop being annoying for a start. Is it too much to ask that you get on with your business and we reciprocate. You're not entitled to be everyones friend.

>>212105404
My point is that, like Wyatt, you have a monolithic view of media production which obliterates your capacity to appreciate nuance. While at the same time you fancy yourself an esoteric master of nuance. This doesn't work. "Hollywood" doesn't make movies. That's a name of a place. People making successions of discrete decisions lead to films being made for us to watch.

Again, "the uk". I want to talk about Danny Boyle and Alex Garland. Real men walking around saying things and doing stuff. Try to build your story again framed around them. Or your understanding of any issue around the human beings personally involved, rather than fantasising all day about forces and locations which are abstractly raping you by putting numbers in the background of movies.

>>212105420
Yes so you need to explain why "the director" or whoever is doing that, rather than the set dresser or whoever.
>predictive programming
Nobody predictive programmed the brandon flu lockdown, they just fucking did it. Have you ever met someone who works for a government? Or looked into their lives? Keir Starmer is obviously a profoundly stupid and dull person who just works for the government because he wants an easy job with low standards.

If you think the olympic ceremony is actually sinister I might watch the thing itself, I don't need someone who believes in predictive programming telling me what I'm seeing.

>>212105531
The new film is obviously a celebration of Englishness and exuberant embrace of European life surpassing The Wicker Man. I'm considering making a video to obliterate the filth Wyatt has poured on the reputation of these beautiful films. Boyle and Garland have made it easy now that Years makes the real point so obvious, but I'm sure Wyatt will still manage to spend the entire runtime convinced the movie is telling him his dick is small.

>>212105134
Perhaps you're right about 28 days later, but his videos on the shining, or the candyman, or the matrix are pretty much 100% dead on to them being subversive pieces of art.

>>212101839 (OP)
i watched it and liked it, and i still noticed that it's weird that people keep saying white countries are too white yet you never hear about asian countries being too yellow

>>212106025
This isn't about particular points of disagreement, it's about hermeneutics. Wyatt thinks incorrectly about art. Even on movies where he might be correct (he's probably wrong on shining and matrix and I don't give a shit about candyman) he's still wrong in the picture of intentions and methods he gives you because he thinks a place in california manifests movies like solid blocks raining down from heaven. Not literally, but he might as well given how absent human elements are from his criticism.

Every time he'll name the director when naming the movie, 'Andrew Niccoll's Gattaca', but just because he's a vulgar moron and that's a vulgar moron's idea of a prestigious intro. It has not occurred to him that Gattaca *is* Andrew Niccoll's. I confronted him about this in his comments and his answers made it plain he didn't even understand what I was saying he was wrong about. He genuinely cannot process that films have human creators who do tangible things to make them. He might *say* "yes I can" if you put this to him, but he will never present thoughts on a film demonstrating that he has done so.

>>212105778
>>212105134
>>212104730

You're too low-level and you don't understand this type of film analysis. The analysis itself is a "work". It's meant to provoke a certain type of emotional and reaction out of the viewer using the source material only as a cover. In this 28 days analysis the analysis itself is a type of story-telling, the medium of film analysis itself is orthogonal from the film it analyzes. The point is to push political views. Rog Ager does the same.

>>212106254
The self-contained story of every Wyatt video is reveling in helplessness, humiliation, and defeat.

>>212105778
>Yes so you need to explain why "the director" or whoever is doing that, rather than the set dresser or whoever.

Could be a multitude of reasons. Perhaps the director is fully initiated into that kind of society and believes in globalisation of some kind, or simply appeals to those in power for beneficial career offerings, or is simply advised to include such symbols by producers.

When it comes to things like the Occult, I try to remain rational but open-minded. I am skeptical that there's full on satantic cults that absolutely control everything and have absolute power, but I do believe there are hidden agendas behind the scenes who have longer objectives. I'm not a big fan of Dominic Cummings, but he's recently been talking about the issues of Starmer, and how stuff like the Winter fuel allowance was basically forced upon him by the treasury, and that civil servants write entire fake meetings for politicians to act out. Make of that what you will.

>>212106338
How about instead of "perhaps" we make a specific claim about the matter at hand. Wyatt tried this with me too. Perhaps "directors" in general could have unconscious motivations. No, come back here you stupid coward. Do you believe Danny Boyle has ulterior or unconscious motives for making these films?

And I am aware the most influential people in governments tend to be embedded deeply and *quietly* forcing the more public and accountable people to do what they want. Our greatest enemies are mostly boring vaguely cunty looking women who are at the heads of various councils we've never heard of.

>>212102613
this if you've ever seen a penis you're gay. I've never seen or touched my own I just clothes my eyes and pull my pants down in front of toilets

>>212101839 (OP)
keep posting this woke grifter I'll never watch it

>>212106412
i can't even tell what's a shoop any more.

this girl has problens :(

>>212106207
You really don't understand just how anti white hollywood are and the subtle messaging they put into their movies to attack europeans in general.

>>212106397
How could I make a claim without clear and specific proof? I like Wyatt's videos and I think he's on point with a lot of his reasoning and detections, but at the end of the day I would never say with certainity "Yes, he's absolutely correct here" it's merely his interpretation of the media. The only way I could certaintly deduce the exact tensions behind it with 100% accuracy is if I could read Boyle's mind.
Wyatt definitely believes Boyle has ulterior motives, and I am incligned to agree, especially with bizarre stuff like the london 2012 olympics scenes, and the weird Jimmy Saville ending of 28 years later. There is clearly more to these movies than there is at face value.

You want my most probable theory? I think he envisions some kind of multi-racial/globalised planet of some kind, and believes that holding on to White identity is destructive and should be formed into some kind of mixed-race utopia. All pure speculation of course

>>212101839 (OP)
i watched both 28 days later and Antz recently, and antz pissed me off a whole lot more than 28 days later did

>>212106412
>clothes my eyes
come on now.

>>212101839 (OP)
>talking about some literally who's media interpretation
Who gives a fuck. Really feels like you're shilling this person.

>>212104394
>>212104730
>>212104730
>>212105134
I mean this sincerly, why the fuck are you trying to engage with this Youtuber's bollocks? At best you're wasting your time, at worse you'll send yourself crazy.

>>212106655
"they"
Everyone attributing specific motivations to "they" should have their tongue ripped out and their fingers cut off.

>>212106664
When talking about people you can only convince me. It *is* subjective. I am infinitely more aware of this than you or Wyatt. I'll put it this way for a demo. How can you prove Chris Chan is stupid to me?

There is no stupidometer. You can only present me with signs and guide and instruct my reading of them. But ultimately it is up to me.

Wyatt is awful at picking up on signs, demonstrates clear motivated reasoning, and his heuristics and mental tools for explaining works of art (or cultural artifacts) are plainly insufficient for understanding them in the only way that actually makes sense (human expression or entertainment).

In the last comments-fight I challenged him to talk about something he dislikes or even *likes* in relation to the people who made it. Really we should just ask him to talk about something he likes in general. This would be bewildering to him because as an art critic he has created a set of mental tools which are only capable of explaining the work of abstract forces, "they" for sinister but equally abstract ends (symbology and programming (not real, stop being a paranoid nigger)).

Don't give me this faggotty gay little shrug while making such severe charges. You're basically charging Danny Boyle with genocide right now on the grounds of, "huh, I don't really know, I think there might be *something* so this charge of genocide should probably stick I guess".

You have a thought there. It's even a plausible one. It's how men of a certain age were taught to think and is the *actual* explanation for most anti-white shit up to a certain point in time. Genuine positive utopianism. That is something, and it might even still ultimately be where these films are going. But it does *not* explain what Wyatt sees in the film. He sees active negative hostility.

>>212101839 (OP)
>click randomly on a point in the video
>its the scene in nature with the horses and he's talking about the different colours of the horses

Fuck me what a pseud

>>212104394
>>212104730
>>212105134
>all that text
>same schizo from the other thread
Okay buddy you're doing a great job, now go help yourself to some ice cream and ask your handler for a break or something.

>>212106883
>getting this assmad over (((they)))
I'm really beginning to believe you're a actually a JIDF kike now.

>>212104394
>This guy blocked me on twitter for pointing out factual errors in his videos and saying he has no idea how filmmaking or the artistic process work

That's funny, I watched two videos (Critical Drinker and Legendary Drops) shitting on The Last of Us 2 (the video game) and I came to basically the same conclusion. Is there anybody making "anti-woke" analysis videos that isn't a grifter relying on lies, manipulation or suffering from retardation?

>>212106880
Wyatt himself is too stupid to reach and obviously doesn't want to talk, but I think that talking to stupid people can be decent mental exercise and can produce demonstrative examples of how to think. Good thought overpowering and humiliating bad thought (even if the loser has no idea they've lost and confidently declares utter victory, intelligent observers with the potential to know better will have a chance to know).

If there's a reason for doing this, it's to save the human who incidentally and accidentally became a Wyatt viewer and is currently slumming below their intellectual and cultural potential for want of guidance. Think of this as me being Ralph Fiennes. I'm an e-druid... and a data-pagan. And a cyber-vegan.

I've had a lot of people tell me they've enjoyed seeing me brawl with retards online and that they've learned a lot from me. Maybe youtube could be worth pursuing seriously. I'm banned from most of the front-facing internet but I hear they lightened up recently for want of real videos.

>>212106995
Yes I be on that Yakubian verbal tricknology. Watch out, I might drop a hexx on you if you read too many words in succession. I'm sure this thread has been a real mental marathon for you. Why don't you go smoke some niggerweed to calm down?

>>212106412
My belly has always covered mine so I'm straight as an arrow.

>>212106883
>Don't give me this faggotty gay little shrug while making such severe charges. You're basically charging Danny Boyle with genocide right now on the grounds

I don't think I've ever directly called Danny Boyle genocidal with absolute certainty. In the end, I have no clue, but I find Wyatt's explanations somewhat plausible, moreso when it comes to stuff like the Shining, although I am skeptical about some videos of his.
So what you're basically saying is that Wyatt has a negative preconception of hollywood, and effectively see's 'ghosts' and 'shadows' everywhere, sorta like a some college grad thinking every movie is a critique of capitalism, but in Wyatt's instance, it's about race.

>>212107033
>it's to save the human who
The people slumming it are stuck in those grand narratives and will not be brought free by this stuff. Most people do not cure themselves of it in such methods; apathy tends to change their minds more than anger and debates are just anger fuel.

>but I think that talking to stupid people can be decent mental exercise and can produce demonstrative examples of how to think
As to whether it is a good exercise, most of these debates are two people talking past each other not engaging or understanding with points the other is making. And attempts to make the other understand usually just end up with you being caught in a quagmire.

Ultimately the only answer to this stuff is to literally touch grass and realise it doesn't actually matter

>>212107008
Not (((they))). I am talking about the general schizophrenic/conspiratorial wooly thinking of undefined opposition, not a euphemism. God I am surrounded by ESL spic-goblins with skin darker than any shit I have ever taken in my life. I hate this fucking website so much.

>>212107012
Here's your answer. Videos are just *bad* for intellectual communication. Youtube especially is rigged in more ways than most people know to be anti-intellectual. If you actually read into the bluesky feeds of guys who've set this stuff up for google and the like you'll see them freely admitting that they create systems in which ultimately nothing is said on purpose. Because this is the only way to guarantee ideological safety. Youtube, its comments, its algorithms, its incentives, all optimised to ensure that discoursive progress is impossible. Critical Drinker is boosted to the moon *because* he is retarded. Comment sections are a fuzzy, undefined, constantly falling apart mess because this was necessary to deter the "trolls" (people who would correct contrapoints on factual errors and get upvoted).

Pretty much all of the smartest people I know quit the front-facing internet and only go on occasional smaller-middle sized forays for entertainment or experimentation, like my showing up here. For a while I was the most popular account on backloggd, then the communist transsexuals of the moderator team decided I am clearly 4chan aligned (as you can see I love this place) and purged my account and writing. Same thing happens on letterboxd. The internet is rigged to make you retarded because anti-fascism is basically intellectual bioleninism. But video makes it doubly bad. It attracts cowards and morons because it's so easy to build an audience while wrong and never be challenged over it.

>>212107167
Again, Boyle is English. Garland is English. Andrew Niccoll is a white New Zealander. Wyatt is aggressively retarded. Actually stupid. He obviously lies about doing "research".

>>212107033
i think you're just really mad he blocked you kek, nevertheless your pseud walls of texts have been entertaining. thank you monkey

>>212107262
>Again, Boyle is English. Garland is English. Andrew Niccoll is a white New Zealander. Wyatt is aggressively retarded. Actually stupid. He obviously lies about doing "research".

So if they are English, they cannot possibly produce anti-white art?

>>212101839 (OP)
Unironically why do people watch this shit?

>>212107033
>cyber vegan
Why would you admit you're gay, now everyone is going to ignore you

>>212107363
it's insightful to normans who have just recently realized maybe the entire system of entertainment is designed to program them to hate themselves for being white. it's usually jews and shabbos goyim

>>212107403
it's a sam hyde bit, this is a deranged MDE obsessed virgin.

>>212104394
>only one person works on screenplays, there are no ghost writers or editors or second opinions
Lol. Lmao.

>>212103757
Did you consult your journal, 'the big bumper book of movie penises' for that one fag

>>212104394
extremely based

>>212107427
so mental illness

>>212107210
I don't think everyone is a die-hard disciple of everything they're looking at. A lot of people are just looking and don't presently have better. If your prior experience of film criticism was Critical Drinker and RLM Wyatt probably sounds intelligent. I really don't think Wyatt would have many unprincipled defenders. He's not Nick Fuentes. He's saying you should listen to him because he's correct and smarter. That he has something to teach you. Also he just has little personal charisma, what's there to like about him?

I refuse to accept that this doesn't matter. It's culture and art. He might be incapable of meaningfully engaging with another human being, but I'm not. I can just talk "to" him as a subject. Direct arguments to him I know won't land as a demonstration to intelligent observers. I've had success doing that before. People follow me forum to forum to watch me do this.

>>212107267
Yes, monkeys. Well known for their tendency to write a lot. A deeply embarrassing trait. Thank you gook-spigger abomination for the interjection of wit and humour. Well appreciated.

>>212107461
This I also put to Wyatt. Does he believe that all public-facing production history is theatre, and that Boyle and Garland are basically crisis-actors? He *rejected* this vehemently and pointed me to his tweet about unconscious motivations. It's of course implied in everything he says, but he's embarrassed to actually own the thought.

>>212107547
Thank you, I try very hard.

>>212101839 (OP)
Why no one talks about how small Cillian's dicklet is in this film?

>>212107609
>I don't think everyone is a die-hard disciple of everything they're looking at.
I never said people are die hard disciples. I simply believe people are stuck in grand narratives and ways of thinking, in particularly around media, that you aren't going to break.

>I refuse to accept that this doesn't matter. It's culture and art.
It doesn't matter because in many ways it has nothing to do with culture and art and everything to do with the basics of human psychology and how people respond to online world. You're greatly presenting your position as being meaningful without enouch metrics to back that up beyond the anecdotal.

Ultimately it is another Internet debate and those are happening at a crazy amount in real time.

>>212101839 (OP)
>Black zombie chained by cartoonishly evil white soldiers
>literal racemixing
Shit man it was obvious

>>212107755
As a man who touched many lives through posting on the internet said, "well, life is anecdotal MAN".

>>212107852
Wyatt, who did lots of research for this film (I have repeatedly tried asking him what his "research" consists of), did not watch the commentary track. In which Garland and Boyle point out that that soldier was selected to be the infected one at the last second from the existing soldier cast. And this is proven by them pointing out that 'Marvin' (the actor's name) is visible in the background of the scenes in which the cast arrive at the mansion as just another one of the "boys".

>>212107609
it's really funny how you interpret everything literally, like me calling you monkey. makes sense why you can't wrap your head around something like subtext in a propagandizing anti-white movie.
tell me coonskin, how would you feel if you didn't have breakfast this morning?

>>212101839 (OP)
I don't really care. I have no attachment to the concept of races.

I'm replaying Days Gone and I'm surprised it hasn't been turned into a movie yet.

>>212105420
> In regards to Boyle, I would like you to take a look at this video of the 2012 opening olympics which he directed. Perhaps you could discern the meaning of it.

Why do all conspiracy theory schizos think that “depopulation” is the goal of the shadowy evil forces, when literally everything that is happening points to the opposite?

>>212107982
depopulation of white people because jeets and other brown biomass will work for literally pennies in exchange for zogslop and netflix, beats living in a mudhut or next to an open sewer (london will turn like that in exactly 7 years)

>>212107956
If English was your first language and/or your skin was not pombero-dark you would recognise that nothing about my reaction to you is necessarily contingent on a literal interpretation of what you wrote. Your statement is figuratively retarded and a nonsensical metaphor. Motherfucker following Kunley Drupka on twitter does not make you intelligent, it makes you a nigger afraid of reading a book.

>>212107982
To their credit I feel like this is less common now. This is a very outdated video by this point. Oh wait no it was made last year, I stand corrected. Nevermind humanity are still pigs. We aren't being willfully depopulated but I wish we were.

>Yes bongs, ignore the millions of mirpuris raping children, a dead pedophile who raped women 40 years ago is more important

>>212107609
you should do video essays on shitty video essayists. i go back and forth between laughing at them and feeling sad that a lot of people genuinely cannot into art. the video essay seen is filled with so many pseuds it's unreal.

>>212107262
The fact you contiously get hyper aggresive over a guy who promotes white self interests is another reason you're probably a JIDF kike, that and you're a raging narcissist which falls in line with a lot brown, jewish, reddit behaviour.

>>212107936
Its also funny how wyatts entire interpretation of the film falls apart if the casting director had not chosen a black actress for selena

>>212107982
>>212108079
When it comes to issue of depopulation my thoughts on the London olympics bit is this. Basically it was meant to show the inevitable trend of compensating declining white birth rates with a third-world population in order to keep the nation afloat and effectively lead to a 'replacement' of kind.

I'm actually all for global depopulation (for the third world) and thankfully fertility rates in the third world are rapidly dropping as they become more developed and have access to stuff like contraception and other issues.

>>212107936
>As a man who touched many lives through posting on the internet said, "well, life is anecdotal MAN".
I'm just saying that people are often caught in culture wars narratives and it is often more about their psychology than it is about the culture and art itself.

Most people just grow out of this stuff because they get a life. Other people stay in it because of the anger. Random debates from people don't change their minds that much.

>>212101839 (OP)
I know its annoying to say this but this type of right wing video essayist is just the other side of the coin from SJW. Whole thing is just based on:
>what if I just take the most dishonest and uncharitable reading of everything
Just that its coming from the other direction instead

Fuck off faggot. Buy an ad and maybe kill yourself.

>>212107982
depopulating Whites is all but certainly the goal of the (((evil forces))) in the world but you are right in the sense that they don't give a shit about depopulating any other ethnic group

>>212108372
Holy fuck you fucking retard take that shit back to /pol/. We made a containment board for a reason. You're manic.

>>212108108
I was saying to my friends after the movie, the helpless girls watching tv who get set upon by the infected after being told not to move might be a kind of general statement on Rotherham. That a passive, weak, waiting to die culture is being annihilated and in the next society children are trained to take responsibility and defend themselves.

And of course, the child who survives is the one who gets up.

>>212108137
I like Rick Worley and feel like I could do what he has done. I probably hate Wyatt about as much as he hates RLM. Just Rick has video editing skills of a professional standard, while I am only good at writing textwalls for the antisocial literate.

>>212108372
I don't feel like it's in my interest to work myself up into paranoid fits of despair over how the presence of the number 7 in movies is an attempt to massformationpsychosis me into accepting that Jews are my betters.

>>212108430
Yes there's nothing particularly black-coded about her. These things often rest on very little. True Detective S3 was written white. I think Selena was just meant to be lively and spirited. Someone superior to the newly awakened Jim who he can learn from and then become a counterpart and partner to. And to her credit Naomie Harris played that well. I think it's a very likeable performance. This is western live-action tsundere. This is Blue Gender (pick any better example if you have one, just last anime I watched with this dynamic).

>>212108471
By making an intellectual answer to pathologically motivated "criticism" we create an opportunity. A sifting point at which the actually thinking will defect from Wyatt.

>>212108587
It's not annoying to say that, what's annoying is these inbreds forcing their political shit onto every fucking board for 10+ goddamned years so we can't have an actual conversation about media without them infesting it with their bullshit. Same fucking snowflake mentality.

>>212101839 (OP)
>28 days later is anti-white propaganda.
It's a Hollywood production....where have you been the last 10 years?

ITT everyone is brown but me

>>212104394
>He's just *wrong* about a lot of things in this video

how is he even wrong, I watched 28 days later for the first time a week ago and now this analysis, it is really spot on

>>212108851
>Errr... gosh.. just take politics out of art.

Most art is political in some way. Nothing wrong with people trying to analyse the political themes of art

>>212108951
Fuck off faggots. Buy an ad, mcfucking kill yourself for spreading your special snowflake dreck so you can earn a few bread bucks.

>>212101839 (OP)
The funniest thing about zoomers is them going to all matter of movies and tv shows and music and literature that existed long before they were born or when they were shitting in diapers and then gettin retroactively mad at everything decades later with made-up internet memes
>this movie is REDDIT
>this song is SJW WOKE

it's not /tv/ but my favorite thing is when zoomers discover rage against the machine

>>212108843
>By making an intellectual answer to pathologically motivated "criticism" we create an opportunity. A sifting point at which the actually thinking will defect from Wyatt.
In practice I have seen far more people double down in their narratives than actually take it as an opportunity to change.

>>212108997
Fuck off faggot, you know that's not what you're doing. You're positioning a political narrative around a 20 year old film so you can trick other low-iq untermensch like you into supporting a patreon. You are a nigger faggot and I hope you die.

>>212108875
>28 days later
>last 10 years
>2002 film
zoomers can't imagine a timeframe beyond their own childhood.

>>212101839 (OP)
Every british movie ever made is anti white propaganda. Who do you think runs the country.

Did some autist just post a youtuber he hates so he can whine about it in a whole thread? You debated him in the comments, congrats, do you want a medal? That is how this thread feels.

>>212108746
Enjoy watching your kike slop you braindead rat fuck.

>>212108079
i don't use twitter, congrats on outing yourself as a twittard who follows literal-who's. now go the fuck back, wordcel

>>212109070
So angry, anon. You sure you are not infected with the rage virus?

>>212108875
Fox helped contribute to get the full budget together, otherwise it's an entirely British production. Get your head checked. There are no Jews under your bed. Stop taking your meds.

>>212108951
Again, this is mostly just subjective conclusions held up by extremely motivated subjective reasoning. But he's often wrong about plain matters of fact in the films he's talking about, like his misinterpretation of Selena's explanation of the course of the outbreak. These are not necessarily critical owns, but they are very strong demonstrations of his desire to reason in one direction overpowering even what is right in front of him at times.

>>212108851
>>212108997
Talking politics in art can be kino. The problem is just how fucking stupid most people are. You wouldn't be complaining if the average politics in film poster was Jonathan Bowden. Don't ask for a different direction in posting. Ask for better posting.

>>212109172
actually this has been debunked

>>212109008
wow there bucko, someone clearly is off his meds!!

>>212109172
>Again, this is mostly just subjective conclusions
and they all line up and fit in very well, there is nothing in his interpretation that seems too stretched

>>212109151
I'm infected with the fucking done virus. Your types have been just as bad for 4chan than the show/woke crowd, on fact worse. You ruin every discussion, frame every argument around anti-whiteness, and really just shit all over the fun of this website. If you had a spine you'd go outside, but your the same armchair activist we've seen for 15 years. And now you want to talk about a 20 year old movie through your lense, the SAME intellectually dishonest shit bread tubers do. And I'm supposed to applaud you?

>>212103757
>The original has dude on a hospital bed with his dick out, retard.

>>212109172
>These are not necessarily critical owns, but they are very strong demonstrations of his desire to reason in one direction overpowering even what is right in front of him at times.

That's a fair argument in and of itself, but even if he has his biases or inclinations, it doesn't mean that he's wrong. There are some stuff that I might say that he is reaching, but when it comes to stuff like the black man in the manor with chains around his neck being mocked by the White English soldier, I strongly believe that there was a symbolic intention behind that imagery.

>>212109118
This nigga is an obsessed jew that has been harassing Wyatt Stagg in his comments for months, if not years lmao

>>212109058
Yeah a lot of stupid people exist. But "far more" is not "all". I'm not out to save everyone. "Extremely few..."

>>212109118
No I did not make the thread. If there was nothing in the catalog I would just have made a positive OP to air thoughts on the film and lay out my own read plainly. It has about come out now between these two threads, that the film is deeply patriotic and reactionary. More like a tender moving on from Christianity rather than an anti-Christian work. An affirmation that human nature is rooted in norms and experiences that predate the modern world and that living in accordance with our nature will make us happier and better. And that the path to manhood lies in confronting the world and others in ways that aren't really even possible for most of us anymore.

I came onto /tv/ generally to say that, figuring I'd get there regardless of what discussions were ongoing.

>>212101839 (OP)
THIS!
This is a Good video and people need to wake up! Europe is taken over by muslims. There is sharia law!

>>212109134
"I don't use twitter, [term from twitter]"

>>212109188
You're replying to a post saying many things.

>>212109219
They don't fit very well to me. And I made a point of actually researching the background of this film and the men who made it. Who the fuck are you?

>>212109266
Motherfucker the woke have genuinely killed most culture in the west. The guy who made the "WHY everyone hates /pol/" screencap has almost certainly trooned out by now. People only use 4chan still because the woke made it illegal to disagree with them on 90% of the front-facing internet. Bad as this place is these guys are not THE problem. They are weeds. They spring up when healthy natural growth is suppressed. Wyatt Stagg exists because genuine intellectualism is borderline impossible on youtube. And these dumbfuck anons didn't do that. Ugly men in dresses insisting you call them 'Sally Jane Black' did.

>>212109354
Again, that actor was chosen so late you can see him alive and human in other shots in the movie.

>>212109467
Actually I first engaged with him about a week ago. I first learned of him about a year ago and dismissed him as retarded because he pretends to be afraid of Michael Jackson for the sake of performative tradism.

>>212101839 (OP)
Wyatt Stagg is a Good guy and you should watch him.

>>212101839 (OP)
No introduction means no thesis that can stand up to its own scrutiny. You have to state your point in the beginning of the video or its just noise.

>>212103746
Condemn the Talmud

>>212109478
So you're saying that 28 years later is based? I'll admit I haven't seen it, although I have heard it has some pro-euthanasia angle. I've also noted that apparently the 'alpha's' are depicted as non-white, and that there's allegories for Brexit aswell.

>>212108372
>a guy who promotes white self interests
He does not. He promotes white impotency.

>>212109684
No Ivan zombie movies aren't white genocide.

>>212109684
He promotes whites not watching and celebrating subversive pieces of media created by a foreign people that hate you. Fucking kill yourself by the way

>>212109597
"pro-euthanasia". Does that not sound like an offensively stupid *concept* in isolation? Not even getting into sides of it. "Pro-euthanasia".

Just fucking disregard literally everybody but me talking about this movie. We are living through a moral and cultural collapse of the human race and I am barely hanging on. Let me guide you.

>>212109519
This. Internet is 99% trannies by now. Hollywood is mostly trannies.
I doubt a single "woman" in that movie was born without a dick.

>>212101839 (OP)
I know HOW they shut that bridge down by Big Ben. What I want to know is how much ££££ did it cost?

>>212109806
Go on then.

>>212109684
He is waking people up? What are you of doing?

>>212104730
Post the convo or blown your brains out, faggot

>>212109876
I'm making white babies with my white wife.

>>212110049
Your children will be sex slaves to jews and niggers. You are catle.
Some people are fighting the good fight.

>>212109478
>No I did not make the thread.
Are you sure you're not lying? His video has barely 43k views for a channel with 11k subs. In the grand scheme of things that is nothing. And yet here you are waxing lyrically about interactions which you claim only started a weak ago. I think it is too coincidental and it does feel like this is just another opportunity for someone to vent about another shitty youtuber. You're really wasting time giving it any thought.

>>212105522
you lost

>>212110137
And there it is.
>don't have white babies, we need to fight this gay battle over hollywood first
Not falling for it, kike

>>212110049
LOL
Your whore wife is sucking bbc behind your back. Wake up.

>>212109815
You know who was fucking awesome even if probably a barely functional insane man? Epic Sellouts. His weak fading whisper straight into the mic was so funny and charming.

>>212109845
What I just said. Since Romero zombie movies have been about freedom and agency. Garland is writing in that tradition. It's a natural evolution from what he was doing in 'The Beach'. Like how George Romero also wrote about hippie outsiders (Knightriders, for the uninitiated). The 28 movies were written by the guy who wrote 'The Beach'. They're the same type of story. Think about that.

>>212110034
I have the youtube exchange on hand. Let me get that for you.

>>212110185
What's coincidental here?

All right, threw the exchange into an image. Let's see if this is readable.

>>212110137
>>212110413
These are the Jews

>>212110413
So far we have
>don't make white babies because they'll be cattle for jews
and
>don't make the babies because white women are whores
I wonder how many other jewish cliches you'll post.

>>212110540
he btfo'd you and you're seething at not getting enough the attention and reaction you want kek

>>212110413
>>212110137
Non-shellfish eaters

>>212110588
>>212110589
>r-recognizing protected pol threads is a jewish plot

>>212110640
Is /pol/ in the room with us... right now?

>>212110540
Anon please touch grass and go outside for a walk. You're posting exchanges on 4chan of all places for [upvotes].

Lol at retards in this thread who think normie lifestyle is owning the jews. White men need to abandon society that hates them, not prop it up. You are cattle.

>>212110540
holy fuck you're *genuinely* insane man. meds NOW!

>>212110540
You own yourself. Stagg said no wrong.

>>212110713
Yes, white men should not take part in industry or have families. That'll show em, trust me.

>>212110629
I have been saying this whole time I'm here for any thinking people who might be present. Not even starting with a capitol letter or using punctuation. You might as well write "I'm a stupid fucking retard." on your own forehead before addressing me. Am I meant to care what you think?

>>212110707
There are no upvotes on 4chan.

>>212110736
My hobby is criticism and counter-criticism of arts and popular culture. What's yours? Discouraging that in places ostensibly devoted to that?

>>212110765
Again, I would doubt myself if anybody could put this sentiment to more than 7 words maybe. These non-answers just embolden me.

>>212110772
Society is anti-white why white man support it?

>>212101839 (OP)
You can make any movie appear anti-white if you're autistic enough.

>>212110540
>What's coincidental here?
You claim you didn't start the thread but happened upon it by chance. A thread about someone you only recently interacted with and someone with a very small online profile compared to most Youtubers. Does that not strike you as a little odd? You're writing essay posts to admonish the person too. I just feel like you started a thread to air your grievances about someone pulling in fuck all in the way of views.

>>212110816
You are jew.

>>212110816
>There are no upvotes on 4chan.
It is a figure of speech, autistic anon.

>>212110540
>>212110816
if you really are going to make a response video and all that, you're going to become a real lolcow, you don't look good in this picture at all and if you think you do you don't understand the company you're in. you look like a pathetic whiny cunt and he just laughed at you and told you to fuck off while pointing out mistakes in your mad paragraphs, you take this way too seriously and you're in over your head kek.

>>212110049
>white wife
In society where women aren't controled they are nigger-fucking whores. Cope.

>>212110905
>you're going to become a real lolcow
>you take this way too seriously and you're in over your head kek.
He's really leaning towards cringe at this point

>>212110827
Because attaining power is how you change things. White men should be focused on making lots of money and having lots of kids. Then you raise those kids to be proud of their race and history and to hate browns and jews.

Sticking it to the jews by being a childless neet is not a win, it's just petty.

>>212110772
>>212110827
Yes Ivan we know this is another russian agitation thread.

>>212101839 (OP)
Everything Alex Garland makes is anti-White propaganda, he's some sort of weird mongrel.

>>212110677
Yes you fucking retard, this entire thread is you crying about race.

>>212111017
Condemn the Talmud

>>212111017
when did /tv/ start hating russia? is this a /leftypol/ psyop?

>>212110854
No. This doesn't strike me as odd. Here's a question for you. If I wanted a thread on this subject why wouldn't I just open it myself? Does that seem out of character with how I'm acting?

>>212110882
In your mind "Jew" probably mostly means positive things. Powerful. Capable. Intelligent.

>>212110902
I am clearly autistic. Put your meaning in plain terms for me. Explain the clever thing you were saying.

>>212110905
He wasn't laughing. He is clearly putting on pompous airs and affecting his idea of distant intellectual language while failing to put up good answers.

And I'm happy to share this stuff here and say whatever I want because I've already tested myself in far more discerning places than 4chan and done very well for myself. Again, who the fuck are you to appraise this exchange? "lolcow", "pathetic", "whiny", did you learn how to argue from a feminist? "lowstatus". "lowstatus", "lowstatus", if you do this you will be "lowstatus". Thanks. Noted, cattlething.

>>212110955
When is the last time someone you respect called you intelligent?

>>212111069
Hey! Language! You were taught better than that in Hebrew School

>>212101839 (OP)
Buy an ad, retard

>>212111073
But /leftypol/ loves russia!

>>212111073
And the shill outs himself.
>>212111072
>>212111108
Yes Ivan we know this is another protected russian poltard thread.

>>212111145
Knowing that you russian faggots pretend to be right wing even though you make all the 'I hate Mike Rowe I want welfare' threads is funny.

>>212111072
Fun fact: frankist jews don't care for or follow the talmud. They have their own book.

>>212111091
>He wasn't laughing. He is clearly putting on pompous airs and affecting his idea of distant intellectual language while failing to put up good answers.
>And I'm happy to share this stuff here and say whatever I want because I've already tested myself in far more discerning places than 4chan and done very well for myself. Again, who the fuck are you to appraise this exchange? "lolcow", "pathetic", "whiny", did you learn how to argue from a feminist? "lowstatus". "lowstatus", "lowstatus", if you do this you will be "lowstatus". Thanks. Noted, cattlething.
i'm not calling you low status or trying to shame you, i'm just pointing this out, you fail to realise it because you are autistic. not autistic in a 4chan insulting way but actually autistic, you fail to see how you come across here. you're clearly way too invested in this even though he isn't, and people here don't care at all about this, you need to zoom out.

>>212111229
Fun fact, off topic posts won't get raven down because the russian government has paid for this thread to stay up.

Good.
To hell with the white race.

>>212110540
Interesting. So essentially you are saying that to understand the art, one must understand the artist and what they believe, especially in regards to a very extreme topic of promoting white replacement. Honestly I can definitely understand that.

>>212111269
>it's the "calls everyone Ivan" poster
meds

>>212111234
I'm not at all invested in how I come across here because I don't respect any of you. I believe I am the smartest person who still sometimes uses this site with no close competition. And I think I come across poorly *to you* because you are a stupid cretin who has a conditioned "cringe" response to intellectual integrity because you are a ruined whipped slave of women and niggers.

He made the video. His speech transcribed isn't as long as my comments. It takes longer to assemble a video. But my level of investment is somehow strange. Does it give you an "ick" to communicate this much in written language? Do you have a vagina by any chance?

"people here don't care at all about this" my nigger in the congo this is the subject of the thread OP. I know this is 4chan and you are all actually here to sandbag any expression of human integrity but I am the one ostensibly following any kind of possible coherent discussion etiquette or even rhyme or reason here. If my behaviour is inappropriate, what the hell is everyone else doing? Do *they* get a critical appraisal next?

>>212111421
What can understanding art possibly mean if not understanding artists? Getting the plot right? Making sure you understand the technical details of fictional worlds? And people say I'm autistic. Art is artefacts and artifice. Things people leave behind and things people create. Culture is a hall of mirrors, the history of people watching people watching people to infinity. This is *my* hermeneutic. Plenty of people I've shared this with have found it deeply gratifying and now carry it with them to use themselves.

>>212111359
*Human race
Fuck everyone.

>>212111539
schizo tranny jew reddit commie
How long until you use the whole list you low iq russian ape?

>>212111553
literally nobody cares how much you like to huff your own farts

>>212111684
You care enough to keep reading and replying, but not enough to make an argument. I'm apparently retarded, autistic, etc. This should be easy. But then, apparently you can't find your full stop or shift keys so maybe not.

>>212111751
i didn't read 90% of your reply or posts in general, you are wasting your time like a moron.

>>212111787
Maybe I find it gratifying to give finish to my thoughts in writing under organic challenges and prompting. I'm here for myself of course. What else? Are *you* going to teach me something?

>>212111850
i hoped for your sake that you got some self awareness and realised how gay and lame you're being in this thread and how little anyone cares, i like to spare people shame and humiliation when i can, go on if you think you're so amazing though

>>212101839 (OP)
Most of the points he makes about Selena (black) require ignoring and erasing Hannah (white) from the movie. He pretends only Selena was going to be made a sex slave, and he avoids including shots of Hannah in the mansion because the same was going to happen to her.
He is interpreting it very selectively

>>212111553
I can sympathise with all that. Id say a big problem with conspiratorial thinking is that many conspiracy theorisers never really create a codified understanding of the people they oppose. They keep it very simple, too simple, and don’t bother identifying what these people believe and why they believe it from a logical lense. I would love for conspiracy minded people to say “Alright, here’s who runs the world/industry, and this is how they do it and what they believe specifically” instead of throwing out vague nations of an occultist elite (which could be true)

someone post a webm of the ending of 28 Years Later. I want to see what the all Power Rangers comparisons are about.

>>212101839 (OP)
The amount of leaps in this video is hilarious

>>212111553
You're a slave to your faux intellectualism. The guy you're talking about is a retard and your criticism is in no way elevated because it is so easy to poke holes in such narratives from such retards as him. You're either a baiting troll who has successfully managed to rile up a thread with the appearance of dumb sincerity or you are one of those "I accept your concession" type autists who have to win a debate, when really such criticisms are just far too easy to call it any kind of "win". You're going off on being superior to a bunch of faggots on /tv/ whilst you're here being a faggot too.

I know you'll respond angrily to me but I honestly think you should go and make an actual youtube response to the guy, like you said you would, rather than being a coward getting angry over a bunch of anons.

>>212111894
Plenty of people think I'm amazing. Where do you think this confidence comes from?

>>212111963
He does this a lot. The most important manipulation in the 28 Days Later video is that after enough time in this maudlin move and his unpleasant mumbling right into the microphone monotonously you'd get the impression the movie's tone is like that. Which is a very incriminating feeling element. What really blew his read away for me more than anything else on my last watch is how *positive* a film 28 Days Later is. Many sequences are downright exuberant. Not in a "we are free from white male fragility and rage" way, but more like Trainspotting 2000s optimism. Freedom. Flourishing. This is overwhelmingly the sensual impression of the film. Not a kind of lurid, violent turning. From here the Wicker Man style celebration of returning to nature and your cultural home-ways felt like the most natural evolution in the world. To me anyway, since I have eyes to see. I'm sure Wyatt is floundering looking for a way to make Years about his own victimisation again. And with enough spooky music and mumbling in a way that makes his voice sound deeper he might convince a couple of thousand poor hopeless cases again.

>>212112011
My favourite dissident thinkers are the ones who really have a feel for this. Cutting through and clarifying things. Identifying people. Discrete actions and decisions with tangible effects. I should go give money to J'accuse. They've earned it.

>>212112119
I don't have one but I assure you that the ending is fucking awesome even if "power rangers" is an appropriate description of what happens.

>>212112011
>never really create a codified understanding of the people they oppose.
Conspiracy theorists make their enemies grand, powerful and unfeeling master manipulators who control things from behind the scenes, whilst also being weak, bad propagandists constantly getting things wrong and open to mockery for being so pathetic.

>I would love for conspiracy minded people to say “Alright, here’s who runs the world/industry, and this is how they do it and what they believe specifically”
I think this parallels their discussion of culture. These people talk about movies as if a couple people made them and don't talk about systems: directors, writers, producers, actors and how all these things work in tandem. Because it is hard to think about what mistakes systems make and easy to say that these people are manipulating you for x reason.

>>212112405
the characters acting optimistic doesn't contradict wyatt's take on the movie, the rage virus is was created by brainwashing chimps with videos of white societies' collective violence, the characters become free from white civilization as it collapses due to the virus, then the army guys who are the final bad guys, are trying to rebuild white society and have angry incel white guys who want to rape and control the women. they're happy until they encounter those. you really really are a pseud, do you think other people don't know that a movie is made by more than one person?

Well, if the movie makes /pol/ seethe then I better go and see it.

>>212111234
>i'm just pointing this out, you fail to realise it because you are autistic

No, he's passionate about a subject. You on the other hand want to shame his passion or are unable to understand the concept and have to transform it into something you understand

>>212110707

And here we have another /pol/ trick: if a serious attempt at debunking a fucking schizoid racist is made, it must be immediately attacked from the "none of this matters" vector

>>212112890
>And here we have another /pol/ trick
I'm not from /pol/. I liked the movie. I think posting large comment exchanges for attention and (you)s is weird. That's all. You think others are conspiracy theorists but then you're doing the same shit.

>>212112890
>Well, if the movie makes /pol/ seethe then I better go and see it.
That's racist. Why do you hate Indian people, anon?

>>212112890
he doesn't have a passion, he wants to flex his 102 iq brain by manically posting paragraphs of perfect grammar and punctuation while namedropping epic "in the know" references and quirky intellectualisms and snark, because he has an obsessive internet beef with a strawman in his head. this man forgot to take his risperidone for a few days and needs to email his autism specialist.
its more sad than anything.

>>212113036
And you are the guy responding to him. Who is the real retard here?

>>212112890
hey troon, the guy sperging out in this thread is also a rightwinger, he just had this autism triggered wants the details perfectly straight or else he has to compulsively slap his own head, don't get ahead of yourself.

>>212113112
>yeah well you called that stupid guy stupid, guess you're the stupid one

>>212105618
they see whites as superior they can't help it