Anyone else turn into a full on seething incel when reading how women fawn over serial killers, like pic related? Just for that brief moment I am met with complete disgust. This dude raped a kid ffs

why don't you just kill someone and get some bitches instead of whining like a faggot

>>212148991
I actually do get decent look women, faggot. Can still be disgusted at these bitches when it’s deserved

>>212148751 (OP)
men do the same for bad bitches and crazy

>>212148751 (OP)
> like pic related
He was a striking man

When I was more of a faggy hipster I used to wear double-bridged glasses and fucked a weird chick who legit got off on the fact that I kinda looked like Jefferey Dahmer. I haven't worn those glasses in a decade.

>>212150147
I can’t think of any famous examples

>>212148751 (OP)
I seethe mostly at the fact that people like that are mostly a result of….. there being too many people and like with anything else there will inevitably be some fucker who decides to become a monster and start killing. Over and over. But they’re not inherently more interesting just because of the number of times they did it. In fact they’re not interesting at all, it’s just an emergent result of overpopulation like anything else. That’s what I seethe about.

>>212148751 (OP)
why does this make people awe?

Nothing wrong with ol' 'ild murder

>>212150113
sure you do

>>212148751 (OP)
You should become a serial killer. It looks easy.

>>212148751 (OP)
>when reading how women fawn over serial killers

#notallwomen

No, but seriously, I'm willing to bet good money that it's only a small subset of women, and I'm also willing to keep in mind the weird, disgusting crap that men can be into, such as, say, this dude, who raped a kid ffs.

We live in a sick world with sick people in it. It's not limited by gender.

>>212148751 (OP)
I'm fairly certain he was also surprised by the attention he got after the fact. Maybe I'm thinking of another guy, but I thought it said Ramirez only really had sex with prostitutes before serial killing career.

>>212150733
The difficult thing about being a mass murderer isn’t the murdering part. It’s the mass.

It’s the pace you’ve got to keep up, the sheer volume of murdering. ’Cause the funny thing about killing… After the first time you’ve killed, the second time it’s…easy. The third time you start to get cocky so you gotta be careful. You know, you gotta stay humble or you make dumb mistakes. And, oh, by around the seventh time, you’re likely to feel you’re in a bit of a rut, want to get artistic with it, you know, start cutting off the middle toe of each victim so you’ll be known as the, uh, “Middle Toe Murderer.” By that point, I don’t know, I think that’s showboating, you know? You gotta ask yourself, “Who am I doing this for? Am I doing it for myself or for the press?” And ’round about the 20th murder, well, you’re likely to be sick of the whole thing, you know? I sometimes I don’t even want to look at another corpse. I feel like if I even see a chainsaw, I’ll scream.

It’s like what happened the other day. I had just finished ending a human life in a senseless act of violence, when I run into this old friend of mine from high school, and he says, “Hey, whatcha been doin’?” And I think to myself, “What have I been doing? What am I doing with my life? Where is this leading? Am I going to be doing this at 50?”

Sometimes I think I really should go back to college…

>>212150147
The thing is bad bitches don't murder/rape/eat people. At worse they cut themselves

>>212148751 (OP)
Well, look at him, he's a superior being who takes lives

>>212148751 (OP)
>I can fix him
>Sure, he did that to them, but he'd never do that to me; because he truly loves me. I'm special.

That's the mentality.

>>212148991
That is what commentator such as this are trying to amp themselves up for. They are pouting about their lack of action never understanding no one relates to simpering shitheads boarderline threatening to rape and murder kids if they do not start getting their share of ass pronto. Like, work on yourself guy, and someone might like your effort.

>>212150896
I am behind every actual mass murder in my lifespan via careful, subtle influence. I am the world's first non-governmental/religious serial mass murderer. My story rings more true, and interesting than yours. To say I am slightly smarter than you is the same as to say you are slightly smarter than my dog. Consider this a professional courtesy and go away.

>>212150689
Just cause you don’t, doesn’t mean we all don’t

>>212151500
If you were getting pussy you would be too busy to lie or even feel the dig that compelled you to. Fucking cherry.

>>212150982
This. They might shit in your bed or light all your clothes on fire, but a very very very small percent are killing dudes

>>212151159
Narcissistic, selfish cunts

>>212151564
it is vastly more than you know as poison and infanticide and the like are only reported when a dingbat fucks it up.

>>212148751 (OP)
It is because being a serial killer requires some level of effort and getting out of the house. Most men put low/no effort into everything and hate going out.

>>212150147
No. Men like 'hot murderous women' like
>oh wow I'd love to tie her down and fuck her while keeping her in a cage where she belongs

Women like 'hot murderous guys' like
>omg he's sooo cute he should be acquitted and allowed to roam free and I'll do whatever he says maybe even help him murder someone again teehee xxx <3

>>212151554
What are you talking about? lie? Compelled you to? You’re just spewing random words, kek. Fucking pseudo-intellectuals, man. I tell ya.

>>212148751 (OP)
Nigga was nuts.

>>212148751 (OP)
>women fawn over serial killers
I'm not convinced that these women are real.

Other than maybe like autistic goth chicks, but 4chan acts like normie women be giggling about jeffrey dahmer at starbucks.

Same with generic prisonners, like that one meme pictures of the guy with face tattoos and zesty lips. For like 5-10 years that pic was getting spammed all over by dudes insisting that all women everywhere find this man attractive.

I guess it falls neatly in the "nice guy virgin vs bad boy chad" incel narrative where there can only be two types of people in the world.

>>212150277
I guess you missed the simp threads for pic rel

>>212151710
if you are confident and getting laid, what made you take the bait? You just like the taste?

>>212151720
How all women don’t find the two you mentioned, along with Ted Bundy to be creepy as fuck is beyond me. You can be conventionally attractive and still have it overruled by sheer creepiness

>>212151753
Cause I’m not getting laid at this moment and I’m bored on a Sunday morning lol

>>212151691
Bull fucking shit lmao. All the comments under posts about female criminals on twitter are men going "i can fix her"/“she can rape me lmao” and being complete simps

>>212151750
Yeah but did they die from the stabbing? She could stab my arm or leg as long as I get to hit that, and shoot my man yogurt all up in her shit. Fuck yeah

>>212151801
Thats a given, and that is why I pointed it out.

>>212151813
Hot teachers doing that shit with students is nowhere near comparable to “hot” (actually creepy as fuck) serial killer murdering his victims

Those fantasies / real scenarios are both criminal in reality, but they’re on way different levels of fucked up

>>212151777
I mean any serial killer, really.

I've never met any woman IRL who was into serial killers or a specific serial killer, and I used to date and hang out with some real freaks.

I'm 99.99% sure it's just 4chan incel memes that created this whole narrative of women being into Murder Chads. In reality it's those very same incels who are attracted to those dudes all like
>LOOK AT HOW ATTRACTIVE HIS JAW IS, SURELY WOMEN FIND HIM ATTRACTIVE LIKE I DO

>>212151892
The women in that webm is a murderer, dumbass. And yet she had thousands of men wanting to fuck her

>>212151965
What prompted me to make this thread was seeing the YouTube comments on a Richard Ramirez video to be filled with women either shamelessly fawning over him at worst, or making excuses for him at best. “He had a bad childhood. This could have all been prevented”. Pretty sure he wasn’t getting raped and tortured like he chose to do on innocent victims. Could be wrong, but no matter what, most people who are abused as a kid, don’t become fucking murderers lol. They unfortunately usually turn to drugs and/or commit suicide

>>212152020
Well yeah, I’d hatefuck her. Put that sexy evil cunt in her fucking place. The bitch

>>212152068
>YouTube comments on a Richard Ramirez video to be filled with women
did those women also happen to say "pussy in bio" and otherwise act all bot-ish? Like on every other youtube comments section these days?

Like I said, those are likely guys pretending to be women because they think he's attractive with his cartoon "Chad" cheekbones and everything.

Like I said, try to find a woman in real life who is into serial killers. You could spend your whole life searching and never find one.

>>212150147
No it's completely different. For men attraction is primarily visual. If a girl is beautiful but bad, she's still attractive and being bad is a pricetag. Women on the otherhand are actually attracted to the dark triad personality of these homicidal maniacs, they are attracted to ruthlessness and have a fantasy about taming him. If a man likes "bad" personality features in a girl he just has a femdom fetish and wants her to dominate sexually, he doesn't want her to commit crimes and victimize other people unless he's dark triad himself.

>>212152268
>Women on the otherhand are actually attracted to the dark triad personality
I refuse to read posts lifted straight from incel textbooks

>>212152068
>YouTube comments
Easily 80% of youtube comments are bots

>>212152266
>>212152290
>>212152304
The link between celeb murderers attracting women in direct proportion to the severity of their crimes was noted before there ever was an internet. Strange that matters to you.

>>212148751 (OP)
>how women fawn over serial killers
There was a youtube video about Charles Sobhraj. A woman in the comments couldn't believe an ugly gook could be considered charming. This woman then gushed about how Richard Ramirez looked like a fashion model.

My point is that even women who worship serial killers have high standards lol

>>212152367
>was noted before there ever was an internet
what are you talking about

>>212152569
I have vivid memory of women being obsessed with and writing the likes of Manson and Ramerez way before the internet. I am 50, and you are dogshit at following the thread apparently.

>>212148751 (OP)
My gf cheated on me with the guy who broke my ankle during a football game.

>>212152654
Which one of them would you rather fuck in the butt right now?

>>212151159

>>212148751 (OP)
They love violent guys, it's in their deep nature
From what I've seen personally they get scared when they hit them too hard but still like the guy

>>212148751 (OP)

>>212152290
This is common knowledge lifted from evolutionary psychology. If you see any critical of the female condition as "incel" you're just obsessed. I don't know why roasties and femcels think about incels all day when they'll never interact with each other.

My comment wasn't kind ot men either. Being stimulated visually regardless of personality characteristics is shallow and there's not much selective pressure for women to be good people. I'm just pointing out there's selective pressure for men to be ruthless. Genghis Khan had a shitload of children for a reason.

>>212152569
This is a decades old topic and you're a zoomer. Every serial killer from the 20th century had fangirls writing to them in prison.

>>212150849
Hard to believe a guy with that facial bone structure and hair wouldn't slay back then. He would slay even today. Guess that thing that incels joke about how "just be a chad lel" to get sex isn't the truth. It IS about your attitude.

>>212148751 (OP)
just realize its not the women thats the problem its evolution

>>212148751 (OP)
Psycho ex incel here lmao at crazylets

>>212153442
This is a great way to find women in your area you should avoid

>>212154099
how do we kill evolution

>>212148751 (OP)
At some point you'll realize that everything you can do to court a woman will never matter. Women will not be convinced to date you if you're smart or empathetic or go to therapy or whatever the fuck they SAY they want

No, in reality, women are animals. they want the biggest, strongest man. they want the man who has proven his dominance over others. women WANT the baby rapist and serial killers. they LIKE having a "strong" man who has proven himself

this is why women go after married men more too, they go after a man who has proven himself to be a viable partner

>>212152618
>I have vivid memories of things that happened 6 years before I was born

that's cool

>>212153958
but you're all pretending that it's hot normal attractive women doing this by the millions, and not just some equally-mentally-deranged landwhales and meth addicts.

>>212154389
keep coping man
"women are wonderful" effect in full display here anons

>>212154453
>"women are wonderful"
I didn't say that.

I said that the one in a million women who worship serial killers are also mentally deranged.

>>212153927
evolutionary psychologists don't post bullshit about how women only want Bad Boy Chad who makes 6 figures a year and that all women everywhere love Ted Bundy or whoever like the nonsense in this thread.

>>212154389
Oh, they are not normal at all, but you would have to be arguing just to argue to deny gross fucked up killers get marrage proposals by the bag full. The more infamous, the damper the bag.

>>212155361
may I see those bags?

>no, trust me bro. HUGE bags

>>212154590
america has 350 million people

lets say 175 are women

1 in a million means there are only 175 of these women. there are not. there are thousands, I would bet good mony, hundreds of thousands. Millions, actually.
women love true crime and murderers and horror movies and all this shit

>>212155453
Manson, the nightstalker, Bundy, both Menendz brothers and more only got married after arrest, and to women they did not know before their convictions. What now fruitcake?

>>212154389
>but you're all pretending that it's hot normal attractive women doing this by the millions, and not just some equally-mentally-deranged landwhales and meth addicts.

I don't have any numbers in mind myself. It's obviously a minority of women who are openly attracted to murderers and rapists. But it's common enough that I don't consider it surprising anymore. And I would say most women I want a male that rides the line. Also just saying they are crazy as an explanation misses the lessons from evolutionary psychology. Women are attracted to ruthless men were more likely to have ruthless sons.and propogate their genes.

>>212154867
I didn't read most of this thread, can't speak to what anyone else said. Your argument isn't specific. Professionals didn't make a strawman argument, I'm sure that's correct.

If you think women don't want bad boy chad that makes 6 figures a year you're just an idiot though.

>>212150113
>>212148751 (OP)
For any vile act a woman does, a hundred men had already done much worse.

>>212154867
>women only want Bad Boy Chad who makes 6 figures a year

This, me and my girlfriends swipe dating apps and we keep hitting these cute guys that are too rich, look selfish or look like they would get us in trouble. Where are all the good men!

>>212155573
so that's like 4, maybe 5 people?

>>212155845
>If you think women don't want bad boy chad that makes 6 figures a year you're just an idiot though.

Any sort of "women want X" statement is at best half-true in that SOME women want X.

If you're not X, then don't be trying to chase women who are into that. There's plenty more women who are into Y and Z.

and also obviously that kids are dating before they even have money or reached 6 feet tall, there's loads of fat people dating each other, short kings with short queens, broke-ass people with 15 unwanted kids across town, etc.

>>212152618
Ted Bundy's trial in Florida was packed with attractive women who wanted to marry him

>>212156115
It is a strong sample of the very most abhorent, and you lost the debate shithead. You may not know it, but you do not know much to begin with.

Why do you care that mentally insane whores openly show you they are not wife material?Same thing with people who bitch about women with tattoos,would you rather wife them up and spend time with them only for them to later reveal what they are??

>>212153442
This profile is so obviously fake, anyone who doesn't spot it has IQ under 50. Why would a guy on tinder present himself in a bad light

>>212156386
>you lost the debate
Oh no!

what was the winning prize?

>>212156431
not to mention that one pic has been posted about 50 000 times

>>212156279
>Any sort of "women want X" statement is at best half-true

No characteristics about women exceed 50%, not only is it wrong but it's mathematically impossible when measuring dichotomies.

What is the rest of your post? It has nothing to do with anything. You seem to be talking to imaginary person that said the opposite of these things.

>>212156491
The winning prize of all debate is to present the strongest argument. My head was clearer, so it stays high.

>local man who is obsessed with serial killers is upset that some women are also obsessed with serial killers

bro is jealous he never got to marry charles manson

its just americans. Americans love violence, murder, gore. they cant get enough of it. they scream like bonobos if they see a tit though.

>>212156279
The mark of low intelligence is when someone reads a statement that is mostly true or generally true, then contest it as if it were claimed to be absolutely true. The exact reason this is so stupid is claims are rarely absolutely true, and thus absolute statements are generally useless in conversation, so it should never be assumed someone is speaking in absolutes. And it would be a waste of time and effort so clarify the statement is not absolutely. I can't believe people still fuck this up.

Would you have posted any of this if anons claimed women prefered tall men or men in shape? You probably would because we now waiting for the light in your head to turn green because someone said women wealthy men.

>>212156981
my keyboard is fucked and dropping entire words, but whatever figure it out

>>212151633
female cope

>>212156981
>Would you have posted any of this if anons claimed women prefered tall men or men in shape?

>prefered

that misspelled word makes all the difference

>women want X
is too broad of a claim and isn't entirely true.
>women prefer X
closer to the truth
>some women prefer X
truth.

it's the same thing with men
>men want women with big tits
not entirely true
>men prefer women with big tits
closer to the truth
>some men prefer women with big tits
truth.

>>212156420
who dis

>>212157171
You ignored my entire post which is probably the single most important lesson you need for communicating with others, yet you read the last sentence and only responded to it because the only thing you care about is a chance to give your opinion.

Women want, and men want, is equivalent to (most) women and (most) men in the english language. And it probably works the same for most world languages. And instead of absorbing something obvious you're replying to me as if I don't know how proportional statements work when that's exactly the problem you have.

>>212157171
>>women want X
>is too broad of a claim and isn't entirely true.
>>women prefer X
>closer to the truth

"want" is less strict and weaker claim than "prefer". A larger proportion of people will want something and a smaller proportion will prefer it. It's a smaller circle in a venn diagram. It can't be "more true" either because to prefer something, you have to want it. But you can want something without preferring it.

>>212157385
>Women want, and men want, is equivalent to (most) women and (most) men in the english language
No. "men want" and "women want" is making claims of absolute truth about entire genders.

>>212157385
nah, outside observer here and the other anon is more correct. You overemphasize your statments.

>>212157503
>"want" is less strict and weaker claim than "prefer"
Is English your second language?

>>212157583
Want implies desire, where as perfer implies would accept as an option.

>>212157522
So you lay on the floor and hold your breath when someone says "men are taller than women"

They are not absolute claims by default. People rarely make absolute claims in conversation and will provide emphasis like "all" and "every" when they do. I don't know how many times you have to be told something so self evident. I can hear the audience for the view clapping with your every word.

>>212157537
ok post an example

>You overemphasize your statments.

Wait wait, ALL of them? or just most?

>>212157664
>perfer
You don't have spell check on your phone?

>>212157708
all of them. It appears to be your mode of speach. >>212157714
I do not and I type fast. You can either excuse me or do my math homework for me too and then go paint my fence you fucking nerd.

>>212157671
>So you lay on the floor and hold your breath when someone says "men are taller than women"
No I just think "well that's a silly claim" and usually go about my day. Someone who make a statement like that doesn't know how to express their thoughts very well I guess.

Lord knows there's plenty of manlets under 6 feet always complaining about how women who are taller than them won't have sex with them.

Fuckin hell I'm over 6 feet and I still manage to come across women taller than me once in a while.

>>212157763
I think you doing your homework and chores is a better use of your time than getting mad online because someone disagreed with the claim that women want serial killer boyfriends.

>>212157787
>So you lay on the floor and hold your breath when someone says "men are taller than women"

>No I just think "well that's a silly claim" and usually go about my day.

At the assisted living?

>Lord knows there's plenty of manlets under 6 feet always complaining about how women

Always? They never eat or sleep?

>>212157763
>all of them.

Ok so greentext one, your favorite, shouldn't be hard

>>212157829
I am not mad at all, though you would like me to be. I am mildly entertained and ready to spar. An alarming amount of women are drawn to famous killers, as is evident by the reallity of many of the worst of them getting shit tons of fan mail and marrage proposals after being convicted of their crimes. What is your counter to these facts?

>>212157522
always?

>>212157959
You do not deserve a reread, and begging is unseemly.

>>212157987
>An alarming amount of women are drawn to famous killers
>a shit ton of fan mail
these are not facts, this is hyperbole.

>>212158033
I guess I've been rude. But you deliberately misunderstand people and tell lies, I would be worse person if I didn't notice.

>>212158063
And this is not a court of law concerned with diving fact numbnuts. You do not win a debate on semantics. You present what is convincing and sway the crowd.

>>212150277
Pic rel is one but it's an unfair comparison since most men would lust over most women. The same isnt true vice versa.

>>212158063
You know you can ask any LLM right?

They all receive hundreds of letters, sometimes hundreds of letters a year. Its a nanoscopics slice of the population, but most people wouldn't guess that much and it's a window into psychology.

>>212158335
If you find it alarming, it's no one else's problem but your own. There's no actual alarm being rung here, and a "shit ton" is not a proper unit of measurement. Of course there's crazy women out there, same as how there's crazy men.

If anything this thread is proof that certain men obsess over serial killers just as much as those women.

>>212158335
Also it's informative to look in the other direction. Men sending romantic letters to female killers is a lot less common, possibly orders of magnitude less.

>>212158419
These are pointless statements. Yes? So?

The only thing I disagree with it's not just craziness at work here, and men and women are different and it explains measurable differences here.

>>212148751 (OP)
What kind of retard is simping for a killer that died 12 years ago?

>>212158428
Those kinds of men are too busy fawning over male serial killers.

>>212157178
I don't know exactly,if you find out let me know

I wonder if I pointed out the vast majority of rapes were committed by men if an gang of redditors would appear and insist there's no useful information we can infer from that because its a tiny minority of men

>>212159405
rapist men are just crazy and you shouldn't think about them at all, it has nothing to do with their nature

>>212159405
In a transparent universe, I would wager the majority of rapes are commited AGAINST men as well... at least in your basement.

>>212159488
interesting, you might take issue with my gambit, yet you forgot to post it

>>212158419
all women get wet for men who murder. empirical fact, abundance of evidence. some women (a minority) do prioritize moral principles over their own hypergamous sexual instincts. sometimes because they love their boyfriend, usually because there will be hell to pay if they stray (druglord girlfriends don't fuck around). it's not that idealism is stupid. i actually believe that adultery is ontologically wrong, that there is a metaphysical substratum to sexual morality. but there is also an empirical substratum to the rosy idealism where women's sexual instincts are innocent and virtuous. the observable reality is that women are sexually atracted to bad boys.

>>212148751 (OP)
>he raped kids
he was also a great striker for psg, napoli, and man utd. so, you take the good with the bad.

>>212158428
>>212158628
good points. truth is men want to fuck and women and fags want to get fucked, and killing is kind of like fucking.

>>212159998
unless you have a needle dick like you and then it is more like knitting.

>>212160047
is this your coy way of asking for a dick pic?

>>212160047
this poster wants to get fucked

i suppose some women do have enough intelligence and decency to realize their sexual instincts are seriously at odds with anything resembling a well-ordered society, but when i think "intelligent woman" (a rare breed), the kind of woman whose fundamental sexuality would presumably be less barbaric, i think someone like flannery o'connor, first name that comes to mind, and then it occurs to me that her best and most famous story is about a serial killer, and it's a rather sympathetic portrait at that. heh.

I still want to bang Casey Anthony