Remember when she confirmed Harry Potter and Voldemort had intense gay sex?

>>212181668 (OP)
Threadly reminder that Harry Potter was not a 'wizard' at 'Hogwarts' he was a young boy that was so brutally raped and abused by a family friend: "Dumbledore"; that he created an alternate fantasy universe where he was a powerful and independent magician that could alter reality and destroy evil. Everything in the HP stories points to this as the correct reading.

>>212182187
I never read the books but I will assume you are right

>>212181668 (OP)
Why is Rowling so weird?
She is ok with Indian Hermione and Black Snape. She made Dumbledore(her own Gandalf) gay, but she hates trannies?

>>212182187
The whole snake thing was obviously an allegory for dicks too

>>212181668 (OP)
i dont think about jk rowling or harry potter at all

I'm rereading harry potter now. The gay rape is only really in the first few books

>>212182999
she's just an extreme femenist, also very far left

>>212181668 (OP)
She's just a tranny with no dick
The enemy of my enemy is still my enemy

>>212182999
Just seething at the golem she created getting uppity

>>212182999
Look up what radical feminism (radfem) is.

>>212182999
She refuses to share her victim card with anyone

>Remember when she confirmed Harry Potter and Voldemort had intense gay sex?

>>212182999
Men pretending to be women affects her, so it's more important than anything else.

>>212181668 (OP)
I think she misses the point she’s replying to.

Why didn't the "wizards" just cast themselves out of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises? Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though

"No!" The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

>>212182999
She hates men that's why she hates trannies

>>212184316

>>212185188
Kek

>>212185188
I say this and look like this

>>212181668 (OP)
I love how trannies till try to act like this is somehow "unhinged," like hey think most people don't want to see them all to just fuck off at this point.

She's also correct about the inherent and thickly-ironic chauvinism at the core of transfags, as they aggressively attempt to assume dominance over female (real) spaces and voices.

>>212185188
..that is the case, however. when radical feminists hate trannies it's because they're the brand of radical feminism that is purely motivated by hating men and penis envy. trannies fit right in to regular feminism's bullshit feels > reals ""philosophy""

>>212181668 (OP)
Unironically she's right and you can't even refute this. If I'm born Korean I cannot change that and magically wake up and say I'm White. Why can't trans people just except what they're born as and keep it moving?

>>212182187
>It was all a dream!
Not interesting

>>212185515
Yeah, unironically this.

>>212185188
This doesn't make any sense. Most people on right, back when the right still existed, thought left-wing infighting was hilarious.

>>212182999
She's fine with gays but above all she's a female supremacist so she hates trannies. She got validation from everyone who at that point hated her and she's been riding that high, viewing herself as counterculture

>>212185591
She's right for the wrong reasons. She's ultra-woke, but her radical feminism and hatred of men supersedes her desire to appease trannies.
Also, notice how she's specifically referencing male trannies, and not female trannies who pretend to be men.

>>212185591
Why do you care? Seriously, what possible difference does it make to your life?

>>212181668 (OP)
If a woman can be anything, then anything can be a woman. This is the logical endpoint of feminism, and it's what's got terfs like JK so buttblasted. This is an ideological schism within feminism, I say each side gathers together and fights it out with knives.

>>212185724
>>212185738
There is zero evidence of her "hatred for men", freak. This is in your head.

Do you think she regrets making her protagonist male?

>>212185819
lol fuck off this woman is a man hater and a man envier, that's the genetic makeup of all radfems.

>>212185819
Nice bait, faggot.

>>212185855
Seek help.

>>212182999
Rowling used to be pretty supportive until she started getting death threats for disagreeing with them on a few things.
Aggressively unhinged threats is probably the fastest way to radicalize someone against your group. You'd think at this point the lesson would be learned but it repeats again and again.

>>212185899
Well I wouldn´t get help from JK that's for sure, not as a man.

>>212185893
Show me one piece of evidence that she "hates men", incel.

thank you troons for turning libtard feminists into reactionaries

>>212182187
What about his foster parents?

>>212182999
She doesn't hate trannies as much as she hates men. She's always been an out and out man hater. Problem with that is that it caused too many men to start seeing the cunt she is. Instead she changed her tactic to calling out trannies since people are getting sick of them anyway. That way she can still hate men, call men out, but also have men (retarded ones) support her.
Ironically she needs trannies.

>>212185899
Go back to Crystal Cafe before you get zack'd, tourist.

>>212182999
This would only confuse someone who actually believes trannies are women. They aren’t. You aren’t.

>>212186022
>she hates men. She's always been an out and out man hater
There is no evidence of this whatsoever

>>212186056
If transwomen weren't women, then chuds wouldn't hate them so fanatically.

"She hates men" Why does this not come across in her writing? The men are complex, varied and likeable. Most man-hating women write strawman caricatures.

>>212186142
Because it just isn't true. Its a demented incel delusion.

>>212186135
Yes we would. I don’t even hate women I just think they are stupid. Trannies are way more annoying.

she's not wrong, she's just an asshole

>>212182187
That's retarded. It would've been Thomas Riddle that abused him instead of the guy that he imagines as a literal saint

>>212186142
Because she wrote the books 20 years ago.

>>212182187
>it was all in his head
Peak soillennial writing.

>>212181668 (OP)
You're on the wrong side of history, chudette

>>212185758
It makes a difference cause they will get mad if I call them a he instead of she. They want us to cater to them so bad instead of sticking to reality. If they want to dress up like a women I dont care but the moment you try to change politics and change laws to cater to you're doing way too much.

>>212187592
Kys pozztralian cunt