>AI = BAD ! ! !

>>212317668 (OP)
I thought that was the amazing atheist in drag

who the fuck is this dude?

>>212317668 (OP)
What is this creature?

>>212317700
An american

>>212317668 (OP)
this dude should dial back on the vampire cosplay it's tacky

>the first thing an american child sees when they go to a public school

Yes. AI bad. Just because a trans person says it and you hate trans people that does not make it less true. You know in your heart how soulless AI devalues the work of real people but you choose to attack them out of spite for their ability to do something that you can not do.

>>212317709
looks more like a modern enlightened european to me, trans rights, refugees welcome

>>212317668 (OP)
What about artificial vaginas?

>>212317668 (OP)
Is there an AI filter that can calculate probability of a person being female and pointing out details?

>>212317668 (OP)
Look at that fucking idiot. What a delusional and mindbroken failure of a being. Absolutely disgusting. Absolutely pathetic. Absolutely 100% eternally invalid

>>212317709
Americans are banning these mentally insane monstrosities. It’s all over before it even got going.
Too bad the rest of the planet is full of spiritless and permanently beta serf-minded peasants with zero self awareness or dignity.
Pathetic weak and stupid common chattel

trannies never fail to make me laugh

>>212317772
> but you choose to attack them out of spite for their ability to do something that you can not do
>play make believe as a grown man and seethe when 99% + of the population openly despises and mocks you
Brave. Powerful. Stunning

>>212317668 (OP)
This but without the disgruntled tranny.

>>212317668 (OP)
SAAAAAAR

>>212317772
I'm completely sincere when I say that if a tranny supports something, you should question if it's not actually something good
Whether it is or isn't is irrelevant, you should simply have the awareness that an insane person has made a claim, and it's worth questioning at face value
The same as if a schizophrenic told you the sky was blue, you better look up and make sure for yourself, rather than just believing them

>>212317668 (OP)
Why are Americans like this?

>>212317988
Trannies have single-handedly ruined the American perception at large. They are radioactive.

>>212317668 (OP)
He’s right though, would slap his ass if he walked by

>>212317668 (OP)
What’s Mr. Tranny’s beef with AI, that’s literally his only shot of getting a gf.

>>212318676
I doubt that’s true. It’s not an American thing — it’s a fucking JEW thing.
But if it were, good thing orange man crushed them into oblivion, and now the rest of white nations slowly coming inline.

>Oh btw I'm trans teehee
Yeah I can fucking TELL

>>212317772
Based

Everyone hating AI will look like a Luddite fucktard in five years when AI still hasn't taken jobs. Arties are such whiny fags.

>>212319152
SAAAAAAR

>>212317668 (OP)
What the hell is that thing?

>>212318781
Don't be naive. It will always haunt them. America put too much emphasis on them. Thank the democrats for the endless memes.

>>212317668 (OP)
Indian thread

>>212317668 (OP)
>>212317772
being a tranny is the AI of lifestyles, badly replicating something real

>>212319344
Indians love trannies. They created them.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hijra_(South_Asia)

>>212317772
AI is not good or bad you fucking muppet, its a man made technology and how its used is a mirror of us as a species.
the fact that soulless AI art can be used in place of "real" art and nobody gives a fuck should show you how meaningless most "art" is. you really think someone who is paid to, for example, draw backgrounds for animated cartoons puts their passion and their soul into their work?
oh, wait... when you twitter trannies talk about AI art, you mean your furry inflation porn, dont you. not actual real world use cases...
the "work" you talk about is a fiverr page where you beg for commissions...
fucking twitter tranny, you just made me type like 150 words... fuck you!

>>212319500
Heh 10/10

>>212317772
If you create a reproducible function-driven product for sale and/or consumption, then AI can replace you. If you make Art, it can't (yet). You, most of you, are not Artists. I'm sorry if you were lied to and told that you were, but you're not. You're a skilled craftsman. That's fine. You have a right to be angry that you are becoming obsolete. Many craftsmen have. But you don't have a right to claim that your plight is harder than theirs, or that it is more righteous.

I don't think it's good. I'm not in love with progress for progress's sake. But don't get hypocritical. If you're a luddite, admit it. Don't lie through your teeth and don't lie to yourself. What makes you so special? Oh it stole your "style"? No man is an island. No art is uninfluenced. Copyright/patent/trademark on intellectual property in terms of "style" has always been a pretty flimsy thing, and moreover do you think you're alone? Do you think factories didn't "steal" techniques and designs from early automobile manufacturers, foundries from blacksmiths, sewing machines from seamstresses? What makes visual creators different from any artisans? Is it the blurry line between a visual media creation and true art (other crafts have the same blurriness - where does woodworking as a craft end and woodworking as an art begin, or pottery etc.) Is it the fact that the visual arts have long been the face of capital-A Art? Or, and be honest with yourself, is just the simple fact that "art" has two often-conflated meanings? (1. "art" visual creation; vs 2. "art" creative expression)

You got the democratization of art. It led to a system where the filtering is closer to the traditional creative process than is the actual creation, wherein halfbaked things are pumped out hourly, posted instantly, and resonance is determined by audience/critics/algorithm rather than by the creator themselves.
It leads to a pretty easy gap for generative ai to fill at the "creative" stage of the process.

We will reach 100% slopification

honestly can't tell if its a very ugly woman or a troon

>>212317668 (OP)
What was the crux of this gentleman's argument?

>>212319776
idk lol, i don't care about what trannies have to say.

>>212317668 (OP)
lol, look at that freakish incel in a wig. I wish these "geeks" and "nerds" would kill themselves already

>>212319152
>Everyone who hated vr will look like a fucktard in 5 years

>>212317772
If only one tranny killed himself because of AI then AI is a success and net positive.

>>212317668 (OP)
Why is it only deranged trannies that hate AI?

>>212317772
>soulless
There's no such thing as souls. Get a better argument.
>devalues the work of real people
You mean people that hate me and want me dead.
I hope they lose their jobs and die in a gutter.

>>212318174
>pajeet projection
You've posted this shit a trillion times in every AI thread you obsessed street shitter
Flush yourself