>When we started building a database for potential voters last year, we knew we really wanted to pull in people from Hollywood but also from far outside it.
>We also invited a lot of voters you might not think of as directly tied to filmmaking — novelists, video game designers (like Neil Druckmann who created “The Last of Us”), podcasters, even some of our favorite Letterboxd users.
>https://old.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/1lqp09n/we_assembled_the_new_york_timess_100_best_movies/
in case you're wondering why the NYT list was like that
it's the new thing with these film lists ever since the 2022 sight and sound poll
they just flood the voting pool with woke randoms who agree with them politcally and exclude anyone who might do a wrongthink
yas kweens

No way, The New York Times movie list was just a political list and had no basis in quality film making whatsoever? I cant believe The New York Times would do that, I cannot believe it.

>>212318575
No way, a /tv/ sperg just aimlessly seethed at OP in a desperate attempt to feel superior? I can't believe an anon would do that, I cannot believe it.

>>212318788
Don't fease out on me, hon.

>>212318881
>, hon.
go back

>>212318269 (OP)
>even some of our favorite Letterboxd users
grim

>>212318269 (OP)
i'm tired bros

hi bros I used a website I found here forever ago, do any of you know the website? It basically ranked the movies with how woke they were, would show if it was gay or had trannies in it etc and gave it a woke score and diversity score. It was good for finding kino movies and shows but I forget the site

>>212318269 (OP)
There is NO REASON to take any professional movie ranking list seriously after 2012

>>212322218
he did the needful

>>212322218
+Araki
+Campion
+Denis

>>212322218
4 of these movies ended up making it on the sight and sound list lol

>>212322218
that was the 2022 list

They should be ranking the movies of the 20th century, the one that actually matters

>>212322657
Yes the last real list of worth was 2012