Daily reminder the iRobot timeline is only 10 years away. And A.I. and robots are getting closer and closer ro matching thr movie

>>212322695 (OP)
Until they invent a sex robot that looks exactly like a prime Lillian Gish, I think I'll be sticking to the old newspaper, son.

>>212322695 (OP)
So why aren't we raping CEOs of tech companies???

Oh hell naw!

>>212322695 (OP)
I did not murder him!

>>212322695 (OP)
They want to meme robot apocalypse into reality because they are sociopaths

>hmmm I will design a robot for people to keep in their house
>yes I know I will make it a creepy bald male jawlet

Is Chicago really turning like that?

>>212322695 (OP)
One on the left is looking a LITTLE too close to the camera. Don’t like that one bit

>>212322799
feminism killed tech robots, hell they even killed having sexy ai voice women.

>>212325775
>t. Spooner

This was actually a decent enough film, Smith carries it hard though. And while it's an awful adaption of the book, but the book would make a terrible film and it changes up so much it gets away with it by not even trying to be faithful

>>212328725
I would counter that Alan Tudyk (sonny) also carried it.

>Spooner asks the robot, "Can a robot write a symphony? Can a robot turn a… canvas into a beautiful masterpiece?" The robot responds, "Can you?" This leaves Spooner with a dejected look on his face
btfo

>>212328725
This movie has a ton of problems, one of which is Will Smith. It would have been preferable to get a more serious actor for the role. Shia labeouffs character should have been removed completely and the film could do without shoving a brand name at me every other scene.

>>212330746
ANOTHER ON-TIME DELIVERY FROM FEDEX

>>212322695 (OP)
>Daily reminder
This is the first time i have been reminded of this. Do you promise you will remind me tomorrow?

>>212328725
The book was basically about the first robot committed murder. Instead of one robot being involved, it was several. Each robot performed an action that in itself was not murder, but as a whole was.

>>212330746
Will Smith was the heart of the movie. He provides a lot of soul and humour. What didn't you like? Shia was tolerable. I just realised that he was a wigger.

>>212331106
Neither were tolerable. If it had to be a black actor for the lead role I would say Denzel, but Keanu Reeves or Edward Norton would have been better. For Shia, he had a run of movies where he effectively played the wigger side kick, one was I robot, and the other was Constantine. I give him a pass on Constantine because at least I got to watch him die and in his characters death there was a character arc that made him more than wigger who is the cheerleader of the main character.

>>212331282
Will Smith is basically white and without him the movie would have had no smirk inducing moments.

>>212331340
Basically white doesn't mean anything, it's not about him being black. It's about his inability to sell the detective narrative that is integral to I robot for some cheap smirk inducing moments. The other actors I mentioned could have sold the detective narrative and perhaps we wouldn't have wound up with what amounts to a Michael Bay movie that was somehow directed by Alex Proyas.

>>212331670
>his inability to sell the detective narrative
Disagree. He sells it. He doesn't ask the right questions at first. But eventually he does.

>>212322695 (OP)
Look at the poor Blackman In a racis white society, feel guilty whiteoids!

>>212332593
He doesn't sell it at all. Will smith can't act.

>>212332680
>WYPIPO DON SEASON DEY ROBOTS

>>212332680
You're wrong. The black guy is the racist. He learns to accept the white faced robot.

>>212332744
You're just biased against Will Smith, IMO. He was the ideal lead actor choice for Spooner.

>>212322695 (OP)
Don't worry, anons. It will never happen. Because the world will end on July 23, 2025. Are you prepared?

>>212322799
i want owen cooper robot

we will never get robots like this because gay mafia. you're not even allowed to ERP because it's "unethical"