I never asked for this

>>212384794 (OP)
then don’t watch it and let it fail like it’s going to. neuromancer and snow crash are actual pulp garbage

>>212384794 (OP)

>>212384794 (OP)
AI video gen models like veo 3 can't keep improving fast enough. Hollywood really needs to fucking die and if AI is the one to do it so fucking be it.

>>212384956
What does AI say molly looks like?

>>212384794 (OP)
Nobody did. What makes even worse is that yes, she's black and Molly should be pale like snow but the actress at least is cute but then they dress her like picrel

Wow, this would've been cool and awesome some 40 years ago.

>>212385075
this. everything cool about neuromancer has already been stolen from and put into other popular media in the past 30 years. its far too late

>>212384845
You haven't read either.

>>212384845
Neuromancer is a fine piece, it aged well since it's more fantasy than sci-fi. Snow Crash was always garbage tho

The Matrix did this story as well as it could be done in film

>>212384794 (OP)
Molly Welfares

>>212384794 (OP)
>apple tv+
It was already over before it began

>>212384794 (OP)
>The silver lenses seemed to grow from smooth, pale skin above her cheekbones, framed by dark hair cut in a rough shag. The fingers curled around the fletcher were slender, white, tipped with polished burgundy.

>>212384794 (OP)
Nobody cares what you ask for, incel

>>212385768
kek

im just not gonna watch it is all

>>212385059
Evolutionary ancestor of the cyberwaifu dreamgirl archetype, continuing to Motoko Kusanagi, and then reaching its ultimate form, Kimiko Ross.

>>212385739
>The Matrix did this story as well as it could be done in film
Only zoomer morons thinks Neuromancer and The Matrix share the same story.
Although I'm not too fond of a negress Molly

Everything Apple+ makes looks so cheap. Why would they pick a scifi project that would require lots of special effects? I guess the people watching will watch anything.

>>212385059
Now I don't mind this "Molly" so much.

the mall my regal cinemas was at was shut down and demolished and now it's an amazon warehouse. to be fair the mall had died fucking years before anyway, there might have been half a dozen stores open in the entire place by the end

>>212385059
Aww, c'mon! Those optics are all wrong. They are supposed to be cranially integrated. Sortof like Batou in Ghost in the Shell.

A third Neuromancer?

>>212385376
Yep, it’s the old Seinfeld Is Unfunny trope.
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/SeinfeldIsUnfunny

Just about every cyberpunk/sci-fi dystopian story was directly influenced by Neuromancer and William Gibsons’ other works and it just won’t seem interesting or original to new audiences because “they’ve seen it all before”. Gamers will recognize it as the same plot from Cyberpunk 2077 too, kek.

>internet addict who can't go hacking anymore because of a medical issue
>gets approached by a dude who's putting together a team and promised the cure
>the job is to break into an AI
>space jamaicans

>just finished reading neuromancer for the first time and love it
>immediately found out about the zogged adaptation afterwards
Fuck me. Why do the kikes have to taunt me like this, /tv/bros?

>>212384956

This is impossible for several reasons. Firstly the limitations on the way AI generates imagery. It just doesn´t provide nearly the needed amount of control and consistency to be useful in a real production.
Secondly the legal issues, AI can´t hold copyright rights. This means profiting from it is not possible. As an individual that just wants to make his own porn or movies you may not care but the inability to profit from it will eventually slow down development if not halt it altogether.

Furthermore fair use and commercial use are mutually exclusive. Meaning the risk of facing legal action would be rather high. Putting aside that any starving artist catching wind of his work being used is going to be able to sue and provide proof of process (meaning they´ll be able to prove the AI images are derivative of their work and ask for compensation) companies like Disney are certainly going to lobby against the AI start ups.

Just hone your own skills and kill Hollywood yourself bro.

>>212384794 (OP)

Haven´t read it and don´t know who that is... should i be upset?

Faithful or not, the adaptation is doomed either way. It'll be called generic since there's plenty of already more popular cyberpunk stuff that copies off it shamelessly, and half the fun from Gibson's stories come from how he narrates it

>>212387132
>We can't use this technology because it threatens capitalism.

Don’t be surprised when the next generation of AI researchers don’t speak English.

>>212384794 (OP)
a cute girl? oh no!