Anonymous
7/6/2025, 11:45:44 AM No.212404321
Replies:
I liked it. - /tv/ (#212404321) [Archived: 840 hours ago]
Anonymous
7/6/2025, 11:49:34 AM No.212404381
>>212404321 (OP)
The CGI is even worse than nu-Marvel's.
The CGI is even worse than nu-Marvel's.
Replies:
Anonymous
7/6/2025, 11:53:08 AM No.212404445
>>212404321 (OP)
She did fine with the script she was given, did not deserve to have the film flopping blamed on her at all, or getting blacklisted as a result.
That always seemed like an odd overreaction when most of her films to that point had been critically acclaimed, hits, or both. Must be more to it than that.
She did fine with the script she was given, did not deserve to have the film flopping blamed on her at all, or getting blacklisted as a result.
That always seemed like an odd overreaction when most of her films to that point had been critically acclaimed, hits, or both. Must be more to it than that.
Anonymous
7/6/2025, 11:56:55 AM No.212404514
>>212404321 (OP)
The cgi is bad but the whole art style of the movie is really comfy and kino. A mix between the first spiderman movie and mirrors edge.
It was funny how they analysed the writing of catwomans letter she left behind giving a full character and personality analysis of her just by looking at a few letters lmao.
Also it was sexy how she hate several cans of tuna.
The cgi is bad but the whole art style of the movie is really comfy and kino. A mix between the first spiderman movie and mirrors edge.
It was funny how they analysed the writing of catwomans letter she left behind giving a full character and personality analysis of her just by looking at a few letters lmao.
Also it was sexy how she hate several cans of tuna.
Anonymous
7/6/2025, 12:28:47 PM No.212405019
Sharon Stone mogging her broke the immersion
Anonymous
7/6/2025, 12:38:55 PM No.212405178
>>212404506
https://youtu.be/fh6satPUU_0
https://youtu.be/fh6satPUU_0