Was this scene really necessary?

woman peeing makes chuddie go WAH-WAH

>>212444708 (OP)
Yes. It shows Bill's unbelievably sexy wife in a very unflattering way, so we can understand how he sees her - more like a close friend than an active sexual desire.

>>212444807

This happens to all men. In some ways being too familiar as a married couple hurts the sexual energy.

>>212444708 (OP)
The entire movie wasn't necessary. Why does /tv/ suck it off so much?

>>212444832

>>212444708 (OP)
Very much so. It deglamourized marriage even for attractive ppl. Which is paradoxically a sobering thought

>>212444807
>unflattering

>>212444829
It hurts the sexual chemistry between the couple, but both still have individual sexual energy. It just might be channeled toward someone else, consciously or unconsciously, directly or in fantasy.
It's the theme of the movie, really.

>>212444972
Such is the natural state of a marriage between two who don't have Jesus Christ as their bedrock. They never took understood what their marriage vows were to begin with, sad!

>>212445002
Most men aren't turned on by a woman on the toilet. But for a few I guess the scene had the opposite effect.

>>212444832
you're not necessary and yet...here you are

>>212445038
You might have a point actually. Part of the movie's subtext is the dangers of ritualized, pagan sex

>what is le second secret password?

>>212444708 (OP)
*splosh*
>did I tell you about the dream I had last night?
*paaarrrrp*
>oh excuse me....well anyway it was about this Danish naval officer I saw somewhere
*dribbling sounds*
>he was making love to me and it was amazing, much better than with you
*dribbling pauses....starts again*
>it was the best sex of my life....where are you going?

was this?

>>212444829
I've seen my children come out of my wife and the horror show after. I've seen her on a toilet a thousand times. We don't fart in front of eachother, and there in lies the secret to keeping the home fires burning

>>212445217
You sicko, she's just a kid, man!