Please. For the love of God.
Stop making capeshit threads.
Let's talk about our favorite posters.
Let's talk about our favorite soundtracks.
Hell, let's talk about why Patrick McGoohan didn't want to be James Bond.
Anything but this same pre-programmed shit.

But we need to know if the snyderjeets or the gunnjeets are gonna win the battle for DC!!

>>212461391 (OP)
There are far, far, FAR more pajeets per capita on social media, than any other nation. Always factor this into processes every time you ask "why the FUCK does the internet have to be like this?"

>>212461936
Yeah, sadly.
>>212461794
Either way we all lose.

don't worry OP, i'm cooking up a 40 year old virgin thread as I type this

>>212461973
huh, i honestly thought China was right below India

>>212461391 (OP)
Here's an interesting subject for a thread: apparently Mektoub 2 (the one where Ophelie Bau has her pussy eaten for several minutes) is finally getting a release

>>212462257
I would have thought similarly.

>>212461391 (OP)
Patrick McGoohan was offered a James Bond role? Honestly glad he didn’t we could have missed some prime Columbo and it’s really hard to picture a 7ft tall
James Bond. He would have had to put on some serious muscle to pull that off.

>>212461391 (OP)
I'm my favorite poster.

Soundtrack threads die after a couple of replies usually, but Bond tends to do well.

It is unironically the same handful of mod protected capeshit shitskin culture warrior spammers from xitter behind all capeshit/disney/starwars spam. Good chances are they're marketers based on some stuff too
they all spam the same articles, twittercaps, "insider info", etc. you even try to do this sort of shit for anything else and you're banned within minutes

I remember reading the majority of jeets only have access to the internet through pre-installed apps on their phones, such as Facebook and YouTube. /tv/ very likely isn't jeet infested and I'm using word filters again first time in years due to the "SAAR" spamming you Dunning-Krugerites engage in.

>>212461391 (OP)
>Let's talk about our favorite posters.
ANTMposter, Hunterposter, Zucchiniposter, Gadonposter.

>>212461391 (OP)
>Patrick McGoohan didn't want to be James Bond
QRD? Did they offer it to him back in the day?

>>212464783
Yes, that's correct. Patrick McGoohan was offered the role of James Bond, but he turned it down due to his strong moral objections to the character's womanizing and violent behavior. He found the character's treatment of women and reliance on violence to be unacceptable. McGoohan preferred the more morally upright character of John Drake, which he played in "Danger Man" and "The Prisoner," where he emphasized initiative and minimized violence.

>>212461391 (OP)
Wasn't there a poster who would always ask if OP was cut or uncut?

>>212461391 (OP)
>favorite posters
Thank gnome it's friday.

>>212464747
Kill yourself

>>212461391 (OP)
just filter them, they'll never stop

>>212464341
Didnt Peter Falk play Columbo?

>>212461391 (OP)
>Stop making capeshit threads.

The reason this board is dying is because you lot are unwilling to watch new movies or even old ones that aren't classics everyone and their mom have seen already. It's on you, lads.

>>212461391 (OP)
superman has the potential to be a once in a generation cinematic trainwreck though
>300 million+ dollar failure of the gunnverse right out of the gate
>when coupled with the failure of the snyderverse, throws the viability of superman as a property into doubt, possibly leading to a selloff of dc
>further disrupts the solvency of WB
>may be the ultimate omen that the age of superhero films is over, which then permeates into avengers which is too far into production to correct
fantastic 4 won't be anywhere near this exciting

>>212462257
Chinks are firewalled by their government.

Can't be a "memetic Wuhan lab" if you're not hip with the new shit.

When did you checkout of capeshit? For me it's was Infinity War

>>212465897
The reason most boards are dying is because zoomer attention span is absolutely depleted and they've lost the ability to occasionally effort post. They quip "tl;dr", "yea not reading all that" copes like they're above it all, but the truth is they've become too collectively retarded to provide any substance.

Old chan used to have decent posts mixed in with the bants, now there's only shitposting. The few worthwhile posts you still see on this site are from oldfags.

>>212461391 (OP)
Unfortunately the mods are stupid niggers who can't moderate a board to save their lives
>>212465837
You're a nigger
No I will not elaborate. It's obvious why you're a nigger

OP you are the cockmongler of all time

>>212461391 (OP)
>Please. For the love of God.
No
We are in a holy mission.
Capeshit threads will continue until moral improves.

>>212466212
>You're a nigger
>No I will not elaborate. It's obvious why you're a nigger

Tough guy. I see...
I will make another capeshit threat, just to piss you off.

>>212466179
This is what I'm talking about:
>>212466212
It's oldchan to inform someone that they are nigger, but I bet you this anon has never once attempted any effort post describing in great deal why said anon is, in fact, a nigger. That's the difference between the chans now. They use this place like gay therapy and use it just to vent anger.

>>212466179
Doubt it. Nostalgiafagging and low credibility gatekeeping are worse than cooked attention spans. There's an attitude of dismissal toward anything new, which is the real cancer that eats away this site. Oldfags, if they even are such and not just old fags, got their brains walled and it turned them literally gay.

>>212465897
I disagree.
We're flooded by retards who only watch new shit. Try getting a Lopushansky thread going. Or a Douglas Kir thread up and running. It's impossible because the majority of posters don't actually watch good movies.
Just observe the chart threads. They're all the same
>Dune
>Capeshit
>Animated movie
>Blade Runner 2049
And then some combination of 80s action movies and the BFI's ten greatest films ever made.
It's all useless shit.

>>212466487
>Nostalgiafagging and low credibility gatekeeping are worse than cooked attention spans.
Cope post. You've seen first hand that zoomer nu-chan has significantly less effort posting. This is likely correlated to the rise of phone posting, and the resulting mass normie onboard.

It's not nostalgia to say that the typical poster is lesser quality now. Heightened anger in zoom posters killed off meme magic too. Lulz can't survive when there's too much seethe.

>>212461391 (OP)
No! You don't understand. We HAVE to keep whining about jeets 24x7.

>>212466541
>Try getting a Lopushansky thread going. Or a Douglas Kir thread up and running.
What the fuck is that? some super heroes?

>>212466541
It's both to be honest. I'd bet you mostly if not exclusively watch old movies. Old AND new should be watched and appreciated for the medium to develop well.

>>212466617
You're the one coping. Bitterness almost exclusively stems from old peeps. And I don't mind low effort posts as long as they bump a high effort or at least interesting thread which doesn't happen too often.

they just need to enable flags on this board, once all the India posters are revealed they will stop making capeshit threads

>>212461391 (OP)
No one's forcing you to enter threads you don't like, whining faggot.

>>212466766
Konstantin Lopushansky is a Russian director.
I fucked up Douglas Sirk's last name in my reply.
Reminder to always double check rants before posting.

>>212466834
>You're the one coping. Bitterness almost exclusively stems from old peeps.
Hah, okay: do you think the rise of phone posting had any negative effect on overall poster quality?

>>212466860
They use vpns constantly

>>212466834
I'm fine with watching new movies, but it does get tiring. They're all awful most of the time.
You're right, I mostly watch older stuff.
But what sucks is that people my age think anything pre-2000 is old.

>>212466860
More likely it's latinxes doing that shit.

>>212466896
Phoneposters should be utilized as fuel, to bump threads. Overall poster quality isn't as important as OP quality and the occasional effort post. Phonies can be grease.

>>212466945
>I'm fine with watching new movies, but it does get tiring. They're all awful most of the time.
Just have to pick the good ones.

>>212461391 (OP)
>Let's talk about our favorite posters
I like that guy who punctuates his posts with "FACT!!!".

>>212467053
>Overall poster quality isn't as important as--
Literally can't bring himself to answer what we both know to be obvious.

A damning admission.

>>212466886
The problem with both Lopushansky and Sirk is that their movies have become "irrelevant" or rather hard to relate to.
Their "vibes", if you allow the term, are too alien. What you want is something relatable that deals with civilisational issues in a truthful way or something aesthetically approachable that is nonetheless beautiful and ideally technically marvelous.

>>212467334
You're trying to win an argument, I'm trying to look ahead.

>>212467053
>More likely it's latinxes
It's 100% these taco slinging, moustache twirling border hopping muchachos.
The average jeet is too busy crying over bob n vagene on normalfag social media.

>>212467572
I guess I just don't see how those don't apply to those directors.
I mean Lopushansky is low budget, but he still makes great looking films with thematic heft.
Sirk may be a little melodramatic, but I thought everyone liked camp and drama?
I mean maybe it's just too old for most.
It just seems like movies are either slop or all the themes are spoonfed and wrapped up in a bow.

>>212467614
>I'm trying to look ahead.
I'm trying to talk about basic observation that we both know to be true, and you're trying to obsess about optics.

Zoomer mind is way too political. You won't admit the plain observation that phone posters are shit because you think it's consneeding ground from your generation in some way. This makes conservation tedious with zooms. Everything turns into game of optics. Though I know you've been compelled to approach interpersonal shit like this due to institutional capture etc. Just gay to have to deal with anon to anon. We're literally anonymous.

>>212467657
Too old is this expression of vibes I'm talking about. The actual year they came out in doesn't really matter. Lopushansky looks great but also distinctly Russian, which is a filter in itself. Sirk was born in the 19th century, the movies he made are set in a world that doesn't exist anymore, which makes them unrelatable.

>>212466541
try being into sword and sorcery and 70s sci fi, it's basically zoomer poison

>>212467746
This is not about optics at all. My problem is that the phoneposter situation seems to have made you capitulate. We neither have sufficient data on it nor is it reason not to adapt. This place is about movies but no one keeps up with modern movies except for the blockbuster sloppers. No one here seems to have an inkling how movies become cult or classics and everyone's just occupied with the ones that have already been culturally validated.

>>212467947
Ask zoom to admit basic thing that he knows to be true and he will talk around it like politician then say
>I'm trying to look ahead.
This is why nu-chan is what it is.

>>212467866
Most of those are cheap trash literally mass produced in Europe and shat out to make a quick buck from the boomer coomers.

>>212467985
You're stuck. This convo is a neat little microcosm for the situation at large. You're stuck and pilpulling instead of moving forward.

>>212467798
I get what you're saying. Fucking hell I didn't think it was that bleak. You're telling me people can't relate to something outside of the time in which they were born?
>>212467866
I bet. I remember being shown Clash of the Titans in sixth grade by my history teacher. I thought it was awesome. I wonder how kids nowadays would react to it.

>>212464719
The number of nonnative English speakers on 4chan is way up. You’re not wrong about false positives but the number of posts with glaring language competency issues has skyrocketed in recent years.

>>212468189
Most people can't or don't want to. And it's tough to be honest. It requires much more thinking than going with something you're used to. The idea has to be for creatives to look at both new and old and carry over or translate from the old while pushing the medium technically and fitting it somewhat to present audience taste.

>>212468085
I'm not stuck, I choose to stand by this phone poster point as it's a clear commentary on how fake and gay you are being.
>and pilpulling
Again with the political shit. I don't care about jews, lmao.
>This convo is a neat little microcosm for the situation at large.
Agreed - you view all interpersonal communication as another chance to play strategic and improve your rhetorical prowess for later skirmishes. This is the average zoomer now.

>>212461391 (OP)
>Patrick McGoohan
who?

>>212468471
Okay, in all fairness and good faith then, do you have any solution for the supposed problem of phoneposting?

>>212468655
Fuck no, most of them are retards. But it's no mark against either one of us personally if we admit this. That's all I'm saying. Just call a thing how you see it.

>>212468760
Sure. Fine. Phoneposters are less inclined to post quality threads or make quality posts. That's just reasonable. Doesn't mean you can't get them to engage with quality threads though. So the question becomes what makes a thread engaging and I think the compromise often enough has to be current thing but elevated. Use what's in use and give it a twist.