>naming your token asian character cho chang
bit racist innit?

You are right, name her Elizabeth. She is clearly propuh bri’ush

Asian people are named that

>>212466960 (OP)
That’s like naming a white character Joe smith or a Jewish one Mark Goldstein.
It’s a perfectly normal Asian name. L

a very new and daring thread made by a post-COVID tourist

>what should I call the greedy little guy who owns a bank and thinks he owns everything?
>how about...hooknose?

Ok let’s name a white man tchala and call him black panther

For me is the Irish kid names Seamus Finnegan who loves alcohol and blowing stuff up.

>naming your token asian character cho chang
>bit racist innit?

>>212467326
Her name is literally Katie IRL, you racist fuck

>>212466960 (OP)
ching chong ping pong

>>212466960 (OP)

>>212467918
Bong beauties

>>212467918
>all the women who hate rowling for hating trannies all grew up to look like men
pottery

>>212467918
Hmm, I do like black haired Luna.

>>212467918
what do you look like though, juan?

>>212467918
Still looking at lot better than Rowling in her bogged tranny appearance arc.

>>212467918
What about the jeet girls

>>212468049
>People posting images or an image forum???? Ahhhhhh I am literally going insane!!!

>>212466960 (OP)
>posting the edited name
it's ching chong ya god damn spook

>>212468198
>image forum
>forum
kek
But seriously what do you look like juan

>>212467918
>Hey Harry!

Jeetas won the race. Parvati and Padma got the last laugh.

>>212467918

How do they all age so badly?

>>212467918
>Asian women age like fine wi-
JESUS CHRIST WHAT HAPPENED???

>>212468371
does that meme count for chineses? i thought it just stood for japanese and jeetas.

>>212466960 (OP)
It's even worse to be the token asian character in the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

>>212468517
why is hamlet low tier? I agree with most of this, especially goy of thrones, but hamlet?

>>212467918
desu i think anons are too hard on her, she's not bad for an anglo

>>212470263
Youre kidding right? Her after is second worst behind Fleur.