>>212531564when the Jaguar dare to be different tranny ad campaign came out there was a billion zillion faggots coming out of the woodwork with the same captain hindsight tier lukewarm safe edgy take that "uhm they shouldn't of done that haha" like no fucking shit they shouldn't, but you out of 10,000 other mouthbreathers have literally said the same fucking thing in the past month as if we didn't know what the common consensus was
Add to that most of these people think that theyre marketing big brain geniuses for saying these things and none of them ever commented or interacted with Jaguars branding ever in their lives, and in their 20 minute video essays they read the same goddamn Wikipedia article making sweeping assumptions about the marques history ends up making the video 16 minutes reading a timelined history for children (brooo we have to bring up the fact SS Cars sounds like Nazis! and the 1955 Le Mons crash! and the E type! but then skip over their huge financial success of the XJ6, the legitimately complicated history of BL in the 80s and the brand revival in the 00s because its too hard and requires "research" which involves reading an AR Online article oh my god its too hard), two minutes talking about the rebranding, two minutes talking about how Jaguars are for old men and one minute of sponsor shoutouts
Modern video essays are so formulaic and gay, its very noticeable with car "journalists" (they might call themselves this without actually doing an ounce of original research that they sourced themselves)