>it's real
ahahahahaa here's your jeetCGI

>>212538563 (OP)
>jeet learns about lenses

>>212538563 (OP)
Its the edge of frane lens distortion from an ultra wide angle lens being used, you fucking retard
>t.photographer

>>212538563 (OP)
Did they fix the cape clipping in the final cut too?

>>212538563 (OP)
>Can't afford a ticket or patient enough to watch a 4k rip
>Criticizea how the movie looks
Is this nigga serious rn?

>>212538674
and it's not like their god doesn't use those retarded lenses either

>>212538707
Lmao these niggas must think Beastie Boys used CG because their faces were stretched.

>>212538707
Then why does Krypto not have deformed feet?

>>212538707
The dog's legs are fine
>t. guy with eyes

>>212538726
how does anyone pretend that snyder isn't a total hack after these movies

>>212538674
>>212538707
Wow, that totally means it looks good now!

>>212538563 (OP)
You faggot wasted an entire decade defending a Superman movie that didn't make up the 40% and was hated and ridiculed by the entire planet...sad.

>>212538563 (OP)
KINO

>>212538788
No retard. It simply means it isn't CG. Nice goalpost shift.

>>212538563 (OP)
what were they thinking with the brightness man

>>212538984
That's a paused frame.
That's like pausing a shot of someone blinking and saying
>Why doesn't anyone open their eyes?

>>212538881
Why does it matter if it’s lens distortion or CG? It looks bad regardless.

>>212539008
nigger the movie is constantly bright as fuck

>>212539039
Are you retarded?

>>212538674
>>212538707
>Saars im fotograffer saars, i no how lens wark saars, its distartion from the edge of lens saars

>>212539039
>Why does it matter if I lied about something? I still don't like it?
Fucking brilliant.
>>212539065
That frame looks fine for capeshit.

>>212539065

>>212539146

>mfw Snyderpajeets are losing it.
And the best part is still to come...you aren't gonna make it to the part when this brings the dosh.

>>212539065
He looks like that retarded kid from Breaking Bad here

>>212539187
>>212539152
Again, paused frames. Right next to the fucking sun, mind you.
>Stands next to sun
>"Why is it so bright?"

>>212539212
pausing in the middle of a movie and finding a “gotcha” frame is the current benchmark for modern film critique

>oh no is that lens distortion, bright lights and colours!!!!! Ahhhhhh help this is literally unwatchable!!!!

>>212539212
it should look like THIS

>>212539250
It's pathetic.
>>212539263
Lmao.

>>212539212
>durrrr paused frame hrurrrdruurrr im retarded
because 10 frames later it stops being bright as fuck like theres a nuclear explosion LMAO

>>212539290
They're right next to the sun in that frame.
Are you disabled?
Seriously. I don't want to argue with a nimrod.

>>212539324
How many pics will it take for you to agree that everything is bright as fuck? It feels like a JJ Abrams movie.

>Gunnjeet army defending their ugly Bollywood slop
oof

>>212539065
the old days of deepfaking

>>212539324
The decision to pose characters so close to a light source is deliberate and worthy of discussion. Every frame is a painting so knock it off with that "another freeze frame" bullshit you nigger.

>>212538984
>ywn get a massage from Lex

>>212539324
>right next to the sun
They're on planet earth which is actually NOT right next to the sun.

>>212539353
Noooo you dont heckin understand the sun is right outside of that window!

>>212538726
is this... destiny?

>>212539353
You've used pics from one single sequence. Every frame literally takes place in the same day, same event, same time.
>Why won't you judge a full picture based on the corner edge?

>>212539253
The colors are still washed out sludge

>>212539436
Goddamn, man. You should be paid for showing such dedication.

>>212539427
Holy shit Indians don't understand basic perspective now?
>>212539402
Probably because they're flying in the fucking sky. Which is where the sun is. They're bound to pass by it or be next to it.

>>212539468
Is she flying?

>>212539461
I agree.
I should be paid for having to read this drivel.

>>212538563 (OP)
that's the foot he curbstomps snyderjeets with

Remember what they took from you.

SPOILER ALERT

>>212539468
Is he flying?

>>212539490
That's a camrip, dumbfuck.
>Look I filmed the Mona Lisa on a potato! Why is it so blurry?
Not to mention, the message is projected.
You know? By a light source?
>>212539529
The fucking sun is overtaking the screen in that scene!

Holy shit. This can't be real.

his feet are warping around when he's going down the stairs, like in a cheap video game.

>>212539490
that's a hologram anon

>>212539571
It can't be me, can it?
Is this board for five year olds now?

>>212539529
he's under a giant magnifying glass that is focusing the sun onto him. these are very poor examples Anon.

>>212539571
Is the hologram flying?

>>212539519
okay

>exploding highlights looks... le GOOD
>overly brightening the image to the point where it looks like plastic AI slop is... a great decision!

>>212539597
it's an image created out of light so that's why it's bright

>>212539597
No way.
This dumbass doesn't comprehend that holograms are projected with a light source.
And when against a white background, it will be brighter. Because it's light and light is transparent.
Does India have schools?

>>212539468
It's not as if that's where the sun was that day when they were filming. They could have very easily put a blue sky or a cloud there. Have you ever seen Spider-Man swing through the city in the Raimi films and thought to yourself "why aren't there diegetic lights blaring all over him?"

>20$ for this jeetaislop
over my dead body

>>212539698
Dude. The sun should be in the sky.
If the camera is supposed to be pointed where the sun is, the camera should intake light like it would if it were really there.
That's why the lens has a flare.
Gunn wants the audience to use the lens as a physical proxy.

>ITS BRIGHT BECAUSE LE HECKIN SUN!!!! EVERYONE KNOWS THE SKY IS FRICKIN WHITE???!!!
lmaooooooo it still looks like dogshit anon maybe dont film "right next to the sun" next time.

>>212539740
The sun is not in the majority of the sky. The vast majority, in fact. Not placing the sun there would have solved this brightness issue.

>>212539750
Ah yes. Don't film the flying characters in the sky.
Holy shit. Worldwide intellect has fallen off a cliff.

>>212539611
They made it so bright to hide the mediocre CGI.

Does this faggot is really acting like the visual issue he is seeing are not from a shody cam in a third world kinoteque but from the movie itself?
lmao, i can't wait whats gonna happen when the projections climb again tomorrow...

>>212539805
It is from the movie itself, because the trailers are the same shit. Shill.

>>212539792
Place the sun off-screen so that it lights them from the front and not from behind.

>>212539805
Has anyone ever really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?

>>212539263
I don't know, looks a little bit desaturated.
Just make it black and white if you hate colors so much.
>>212539360
Looks really bad. Capes can't be CGI.

>>212539789
And yet, its light fills the sky.
Funny how the sun works.
And with certain lenses, certain white balances, the sun's light becomes comprehensive.
When looking straight at the sun, your eye is overcome by its light.
It blazes outward, because the lens of a camera is supposed to be a fascimilie of your eye.
This is film school 101.
>>212539824
But, he liked the reveal it gave from behind. He would have to restructure the layout of the whole scene.
Just for you? It's his movie.

>>212538707
We know dumbass, just because it's caused by the lens doesn't mean it's not a flaw

>>212539792
oh no no no

>>212539819
Its not you retarded faggot.

>>212539898
We-well... that has to be a night scene, where is the sun? The light?

>>212539898
Wow. It's almost like the sun isn't in that shot.
Wow.

>>212539864
>its HIS MOVIE!!! HIS MOVIE!! HIS CHOICE!! LEAVE HIM ALONE!!!!

>>212539967
Uh.
Yeah. Pretty much.
You morons don't understand how light works.
You're going to make a better movie than him?

>>212538563 (OP)
smartest AI

>>212539065
>Superman can't be grimdark! he must be noblebright!
>how do we do that?
>make him cry and scream alot, and keep the screen brightness up really high!
modern hollywood folks.

>>212539877
Its not a "flaw" when its a literal intentional stylistic choice.

Really great criticism guys. We got the next generation of Pauline Kael's here.
>The film is bad because light and emotion

>>212539864
>And yet the light fills the sky
And yet I can stare directly at 99.9% of the sky without suffering damage to my corneas. Therefore, not placing the sun on screen removes this unnecessary blare.
>And certain lenses
It's all post-production you actual nigger. It's high budget digital film capeslop and your talking lenses like they matter at all.
>But he liked the reveal
Yeah, some tasteless asshole involved in the production of this film thought those lens blares looked cool and they are wrong. It's been a long time since I've seen it but I remember Man of Steel having a similar problem but it was with lens flares in every scene. This image I found on google of Man of Steel looks similarly retarded but with some extra steps.

>>212539360
they really need to up the fps of modern films, 24 is an abortion to look at at these camera movements. 100fps or bust.

>james gunn is ITT right now defending overexposure

>>212539961

>>212539961
It looks better as a result.
Amazing.

>>212538716
>Did they fix the cape clipping in the final cut too?
Did they fix the cape clipping in the final cut too?

>>212540079
It's a choice. You not liking it doesn't mean shit.
Gunn wants the audience to feel like they're there exposed to the elements.
And yes, actual lenses are involved. Of course the details are added in post, but light sources are used on set to mimic the final result.
You have nothing besides
>I don't like it
Fine. Go ahead. Hate it.
But that doesn't mean it's a flaw.

>Here's the special effects team I was telling you about. We've already passed out H1B visas like candy and they all work 16 hour days for less than minimum wage. We're keeping them in a 2 bedroom apartment in north Hollywood and only have to feed them once a day!

>>212540079
Here's another example of Man of Steel also looking like complete and total shit. This one doesn't have the "blare" effect though, just the "flare" effect. Every fucking scene in this movie had that flare effect goddamn.

>>212540135
According to what?
What's your system of grading?
>>212540107
Wow. Different color palette and maybe an ND filter.
Subjects spaced farther away.
Wow.

>>212540162
This nigger thinks they flew up there. Nigger this ain't a Tom Cruise movie.

>>212540209
Never said that at all.
Learn to read faggot.

>>212540199
Looking at it.

>>212540238
Oh. So nothing of any value.
Got it.

>>212540226
Actual lenses have nothing to do with a fake sun in a fake setting. You are watching Wall-E during those scenes.

>>212540199
>Subjects spaced farther away.

>>212539360
Why the fuck do their bodies move like claymation?

Were the actors even on set?

>>212540254
It's a visual medium. That's the first thing I'm going to judge it on. Every frame is a painting.

>>212540283
lmao

>>212540263
I never said they did. I said actual lenses were used.
Please. My God. Learn to read.
>>212540283
And now that looks compositionally similar to the Spider-Man shot minus the difference in color palette.
This is really simple guys.

>>212540295
You're right. But it's a subjective visual medium.

>>212540338
are you blind half the screen is as bright as 4chin background >>212540315

>>212540385
Compositionally. Not color palette.
Color palette affects light, y'know?
But the shot is similar, the subjects are similarly placed, and the surroundings are similar.

>>212540338
So what does the interaction between light and lens have to do with a shot of a fake sun that didn't need to be placed there to begin with? Care to extrapolate?
>>212540379
That's a great answer.

>>212538726
what a fucking hideous movie

>>212540447
yeah just one burns your eyes and the other is nice to look at

>>212540472
Because the lens films the actors in a certain way.
That's one.
Lights are setup offscreen to light the actors in a way which the visual effects will try to match.
The light needs to match the milimeter of the lens, so it's an accurate recreation of how the lens would record that light.
The light needs to match how the characters are lit because if there's a difference, the effects are worthless.
>>212540494
Subjectively, you mean.

>>212540555
staring at bright lights objectively is not pleasant

>>212538726
what game?

>>212540588
That's why you don't freezeframe the film on a bright image and stare at it.
I sat in a dark opening night theater yesterday and was fine. Everyone else was fine.
No complaints, no walkouts, no nothing.
No other critic said it was too bright either.
Don't pause films. Watch them.

>>212540618
>just don't pay attention to the composition that VFX artists spent years on and cost more than you'll make in that time, just laugh at the wa-wa-wacky quips and say it was good

>>212540555
That's still a deliberate placement of light. If they light the actors differently, then they can place the sun elsewhere and the movie will look better as a result.

>>212538725
>Not buying means not being able to afford
What is this brand of retardation called?

>>212540618
>That's why you don't freezeframe the film on a bright image and stare at it.
nigger that video is 2 minutes long and every scene is overly fucking bright the sky is literally WHITE

>>212540555
It's not happenstance is what I'm getting at. It was never at any point out of their control. It was never at any point "they're in the sky, why wouldn't the sun be there?" They chose to do this because they have bad taste.

>>212540694
Just awful rebuttals ITT.
In reality, don't mistake personal preference for objective critique.
Use context clues to understand your surroundings.
>I paused the film during a funny face! This film is bad!
>I paused the film during a change in light! This film is bad!
Basic comprehension stuff.

>>212538563 (OP)
>not CJEETI
you had ONE JOB

>youre a jeet
>no YOURE a jeet
>no YOURE the jeet!
if you faggots ruin indian hate arguing over baby movies I will destroy this board.

>>212539898
This movie was dogshit.

>>212540713
Yes. To you, it will.
To most, it looks fine, serves a purpose, and is forgettable.
>>212540742
Go the fuck outside consistently. The sky just looks like that sometimes.
Seriously. The outside world is fascinating.
>>212540756
Except, it isn't bad.

>>212538726
wow wow wow wow wow wow wow

>>212540790
Ironically the movie itself puts jeets on a pedestal

>>212539805
>Does this faggot is really acting

>>212539065
its bc superman gets his power from the sun, its simple pottery

>>212540769
When I say that Final Fantasy XVI is putrid dogshit for the lowest common denominator and a slap in the face to longtime fans of the franchise, "in my opinion" is implied. Everyone understands this. You are trying to be the language police.
Which is it? Are we not allowed to talk about the movie without autistically labeling everything as "in my opinion"? Or are we not allowed to share negative thoughts about the movie at all?
I think your "Gunn"ing for the second one, ahyuck.

>>212539605
A movie from 12 years ago should not be comparable to a movie from today, and yet the special effects seem like they've stagnated. The only advancements Hollywood has made is with de-aging technology. Somehow Disney unlocked the secret to that, and yet everything else they CGI is utter trash. AI can't come soon enough

Hey James, since you're in this thread, can you tell the home video department to put Static Shock on Blu-ray? For some reason they didn't do that one when they did the rest of the DC cartoons. Also the Batman vs. Dracula. kthx.

>>212538726
>>212539430
I was just about to say that tank is a clear ripoff of the spider tank from Destiny.

>>212540894
I think you're failing to give any reason beyond "I don't like it."
Which is fine. But unimportant.
I'm giving reasons for why it is the way it is.
Most of the replies are:
>But I don't like the way it is
Again, fine.
But don't expect me to take that shit seriously.

>>212538726
SIRS MR SNYDER IS A DOING A KINO

lmaoing @ gunnjeets

>>212539360
Holy shit that is bad. Gunnjeets, your response?

>lmaoing @ gunnjeets
And it's literally just a sky Indians don't like.
Which I get.
India is so polluted seeing the sun must be frightening.

>>212538726
What moobie does this are?

>>212540954
we really need amazing spidey 3 with venom so garfield fights an alien

>>212538726
Why is there literally a Fallen walker in that shot

>>212540964
Um, erm, it looks less shit than Flash so that means it’s okay!

>>212538726
Is this The Flash?

>>212538726
wtf why did tachikoma disintegrate that amish guy?

>capeshitards actually defending this
lol you fags even worse than jeets

>>212540935
You're reasons for why it is were retarded and I refuted them earlier. Nothing about that was subjective. You deflected to this subjectivity point because it gives you a leg to stand on. Because there is not objective reason for the sun to be in frame the way it is. That is a product of the creator's subjective taste, not a product of what makes sense in the scene. You keep using the characters relation to the sun as a reference point but you can't refute my point that the sun's placement is arbitrary without deflecting to the subjectivity argument on behalf of the director's vision, but the second you do that you rescind the credibility necessary to say "I'm giving reasons for why it is the way it is." You aren't. You're arguing with me that it's a matter of the director's taste vs mine while continuing to insist to others itt that it's got some logical reason to it. Nigger it ain't both. The sky absolutely does not HAVE to look like that and the sun does not HAVE to be up Superman's ass and around the corner.

>>212541217
Your*
Unfortunate autocorrect error. The rest of the sentence while technically sound does look awkward and that autocorrect exacerbates things. A lack of visual integrity can really get in the way of a message.

>>212541217
You didn't refute shit.
Of course it doesn't have to look like anything.
It's a choice. I've said this already.
Gunn could have left the lens cap on and made an animated film.
But in live action, he wanted the color palette bright. To be dramatic and exaggerated, like a comic book. He made it bright, using natural reasoning, i.e. the sun.
Gunn wanted the fight scenes to be set in the sky. Therefore the characters will be in front of the sun at certain points.
The objective reason is because it's his movie. The sky often looks like that on clearer days, and that's when the scene was designed to be set.
Here's your replies to that:
>B-but I don't like that! He did that! He did!
No fucking shit. Here you are complaining about obvious statements.
Read the credits, locate the directing one, and there's his name.
Again, you can dislike it. But

>>212541291
You're fine. It didn't bother me. Grammatical errors are common in this kind of setting. I do them all the time.
Forgive my aggressiveness, I get heated.

>this faggotshit is meta 70
what a fucked up timeline
I need more drinks

>>212541370
>But
See? I did a grammatical error right there. Unfinished sentence, lol.

>>212541370
Notice how the white sky isn't bleeding into the entire picture like in Superjew?

>>212541398
Isn't that roughly what most mediocre MCU films get?

>>212541491
I watched the movie, it looked pretty, the camera is moving in this scene

>>212539605
Looks great for a decade old movie.

>>212541491
That has to do with aperture.
It's a choice that can mimic how our eyes perceive light in very bright settings.
Camera lenses swallow large amounts of light.
Some would adjust that shot so the light was allocated specifically to the outside.
Gunn wanted the light to spill inside the frame. Again, he wanted the film bright.
It's a stylistic choice, reflecting theme and atmosphere.

>>212541552
notice they won’t post .WEBM’s aka literally all that matters when watching a movie

>tripfags are defending gunnshit
kek

>>212541590
It looks like shit.

>>212541590
It's clearly a shitty filter

>>212541590
looks like washed out shit where you cant even see anything half the time lmao

>>212541620
>>212541623
>>212541662
>it looks like shit
Layman's film criticism, everyone.

>>212541398
before it goes bomb average capeshit hit 55~65 at best
now it's 70 because 'critics' are fucking pussy

>>212539360
what vidya is this

>>212541779
You lay with men because you are a gay faggot

>>212541600
>The absolute state of anon's reading comprehension.
Who the fuck let you have a computer?
>>212541370
I feel like >>212541590 is an improvement, however subtle, over your messaging earlier in the thread. I got drawn into all of this by the "one still frame" argument earlier which did nothing for me. Even though I already disagree with you, when I read >>212541590 and then read its replies >>212541620 >>212541623 my subjective opinion is that those replies are retarded and your post is more convincing than theirs. I personally take credit for your growth as a human being.

>>212541810
What are you an extra from Idiocracy?

>>212541835
I appreciate you feeling that way and telling me, but I just want to make sure that you as well as everyone here, knows that it's alright to just dislike something.
I hate the lens flares in JJ Abram's Star Trek.
Why did he do it? So it would be more dramatic. So it would seem space-agey and technological. So it would ground it in a way that was a proxy for the audience.
But I still hated it.
This post sounds faggy as hell, but I just miss when criticism was approached in good faith.
You approach it in good faith, and we've had a great back and forth. We didn't convince each other, but we gave good reasoning.
I was probably more emotional than I should've been, but hey, I'm not perfect.
Anyways, I enjoyed this debate. Not liking Superman is in no way a sign of poor taste.

>>212541952
Kubrick mindfucked a lot of young people with this scene

https://youtu.be/LKmCIJ2l8qc

Started a craze

>>212539519
Thankfully I got the superfight I'd been waiting for for years. Ended up loving MoS purely because of this.

>>212542112
I never even noticed that, desu.
A poor mindset to have is that if Kubrick did it, I can too.

>>212542112
BRAVO STANLEY

>>212539324
How about don't point the camera directly at the sun then? Never mind that that's most likely not the real sun but was CGI'd in on later because for some reason they thought this looked good

>>212539605
You can literally FEEL the shockwaves holy FUCK

>>212539605
>>212543006
I bet it was kino in theaters

>>212543160
It wasn't.

>>212539065
What Nostalgia Critic episode is this?

>>212543160
It was. Fucking awesome to watch on a huge screen.

>>212539605
Wish I had seen this in theatres
Only capeshit ending where you can feel the bad guy progressively getting stronger as the action gets faster and faster

>>212543266
The whole fight was pure kino. Especially Zod basically learning how strong he is as it went.

Hot take: Cinematogrophy went down the drain with CGIbecause where a director before had to work with veteran cameramen, lighters etc. And also had to set up shoots grounded in reality he nowcan do whatever the fuck on his own/what a bunch of fucking boardmembers want. The cheap jeets wont talk back and say "This looks floaty as fuck"
Plus actors all just play pure make believe now wherass previously there were props etc. Das Boot was filmed in a smallass uboat recreation in a hangar the actors werent allowed toleave for all filming so they wouldnt get sun exposure. You cant tell me a actor subjected to this wont play a man crammed into a submarine better then some fag infront of a green box holding a green plastic rectangle for a gun.

>>212538563 (OP)
We got this scene in HD on youtube you retard.

>>212538770
Boutella titties

>>212539360
Cool GTA V mod.

>>212538563 (OP)
>luther has a literal army of pocket dimension monkeys to trash superman online
ludokino narrative

>>212538726
Snyder knows establishing shots are for lesser directors. Why should I know where things are in relation to each other or what is going on?

>>212538726
what movie is that

>>212539290
I fucking hate CGI. Motion blur and muddy visuals are all we seem to get these days.

>>212538726
>B...BUT SNYDER
KEEEEEEEEEEEK

Please rangeban India

I just can't... It's like all these horrible big movies are being made by some jeet AI on their s25ultra or something.
Say what you want about that cliché F1 movie, atleast it has real cars, real people, real stuff in it.

>>212545031
Nobody'd shill this movie if that happened.

>>212539605
Lmao nigga this shit is older than some shitposters on /tv/, and it still is being brought up.
The small town fight still looks amazing, real life dbz tier. I remember watching it in theaters and it was absolute mayhem kino only retarded sois didn't like

>>212539360
>13 years have passed since man of steel
>this shit is the new upgraded superman blockbuster
capeshit is beyond retarded.

>>212539750
Never thought I will see an unreal engine 5 sky on a movie

>>212540740
>I can afford caviar, but instead I buy tilapia from the dollar store and eat it raw and then complain that it doesn't taste or like caviar

>>212545277
You're really fucking bad at analogy.
Here's a good one.
>this supposed 4 star chef hired indian cooks to pile slop on a plate and call it caviar
>I'm literally watching those filthy fucking pajeets make that shit on the dirty tile floor
>why the fuck would I spend any amount of money on this?

>>212545409
I didn't read your analogy because I simply don't care. Get over it.

>>212545425
What's the matter? Afraid you might agree with it?

>>212545461
Sure, whatever ends this cringe conversation, bro.

>>212538726
Furiosa?

>>212538726
sirs good morning what movie is vide o is from ???
its good how he doin it

>>212539605
kino

>>212540809
It's fucking awful

>>212540338
>And now that looks compositionally similar to the Spider-Man shot minus the fact that the color pallette is dog shit, washes everything with excessive brightness and wastes a lot of space

>>212539571
Thats a jew

>movie has a certified fresh RT score
>every single youtube review I’ve watched says it’s mixed to bad
What’s going on

>>212540176
Jfc

>>212539991
I think anyone that understands not over-saturating shots in excess with negative space and a good use of contrast could shoot better shots than him.

>>212538726
holy shit this is bad

>>212546431
>RT score
purely based on politics and has been for well over a decade

>>212539360
It looks like a bollywood movie desu.
The editing, the camera movement, the colors, all of it.

>>212546431
>Paid reviews
>Non-paid reviews

This movie looks awful.
HOWEVER
That does not mean MOS was even remotely good.
Both are terrible.

>Let people enjoy things!!!!
no.

>>212546431
its the last cope of big capeshit

>>212540080
>they really need to up the fps of modern films
Didn't Peter Jackson try to do that with the Hobbit movies and got absolutely destroyed by critics for it?

>>212546677
Now that I think of it, I wonder if those reviews that broke embargo were protesting because they were offered money and didn’t want to take it? Because that was weird and had never happened before.

They really just did the black noir reveal from the boys AND the "space superhuman are actually an evil empire" thing from invincible from other evil superman media..except dumber somehow

>>212540929
>Retarded zoomer doesn't know about the sw prequel tank
>which is already a design clone of another tank from another IP

James Gunn is an unfunny faggot and every joke he tried to force fell flat.

>>212539605
>all the Indians defending this
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>212539605
which PS1 game is this?

>>212542112
isnt this sexual harrasment he grabs her without consent

also they are not responding after he asks like 6 questions he should walk away they're not intersted

>>212545139
Jews are shilling it though

Guys please warner bros is running out of money for movies. This is their last hope. Please guys not like this

>>212540288
like someone else mentioned, they're still using under 30 fps when they make things in cgi

>>212539065
he cute

>>212538770
Because Gunn is also a hack and doesn't deserve a pass just because Snyder is a terrible film maker. That's it.

>>212538726
my best game link to the apk?

>>212541370
Sigh... Why did you have to post this sexy horse? Now i'll have to masturbate for at least 2 hours.

>>212538563 (OP)
What's with his Bozo shoe?

>>212547150
You have anything to say about this >>212539360?

>>212539519
No, we got enough. And it's still there if anyone would ever want to watch it again. No one took anything. There was no demand for further Snyder Superman shit. He concluded his stories.

>>212546431
>WB owned site for WB owned movie
>$200 man of marketing budget

>>212539750
>le heckin

Go back.

>>212539750
>EVERYONE KNOWS THE SKY IS FRICKIN WHITE
Yes it is often. Have you never been outside?

Did they fix it in post? I won't watch this slop.

>>212539360
Who is the bad guy?

Dictating commands by Luther is the most retarded thing ever. Just use ai, your dimwit.

>>212538563 (OP)

>>212538726
Is this the Pocahontas live action reboot?

>>212546517
Negative space isn't bad if you want focus on specific objects in it.
The contrast here isn't bad either. It's bright but you can clearly see where it blends and stands apart.

>>212538707
Admit this film has terrible cinematography. Admit it right now, faggot “photographer”