How does /tv/ feel about the use of intimacy coordinators?

>>212552767 (OP)
actresses exist to get naked for me. yes they are sex objects, otherwise they would have go to medical school instead

>>212552767 (OP)
As long as they make sure that what's captured on camera is as gratuitous as possible, I'm all for it.

>>212552767 (OP)
I prefer my intimacy uncoordinated

>>212552767 (OP)
I think it's gay and unnecessary but if that's what we need to see women's tits on film I'll tolerate their existence.

>intimacy coordinators
Retarded concept, do they use serial killers to give the guy who plays Dexter advice just so he understands the nuance of what it’s like to take someone’s life? Fuck off with that retarded kikewood bullshit

>>212552883
The murders arent real, the sucking on titties is

>>212552883
If you were cast in a movie where a guy plays with your balls a little bit wouldnt you want to set some boundaries beforehand?

>>212552906
>The murders arent real
Alec Baldwin.jpeg

idk, i never had sex..especially in a film

I always look for pads being used over genitals in sex scenes. They're very blatant in Euphoria. Can't be fingering Sydney's asshole while hitting it doggy style.

>>212552767 (OP)
they should have movies that are serious high quality well written productions with good actors but where the sex scenes turn into actual hardcore porn
I'll wait for AI for that

>>212552767 (OP)
It's boring unless the actress has a great body and shows it off because 99% of the time they're not really fucking are they. It's just boring softcore unless it's filmed and acted really well.

>>212552767 (OP)
Honestly sucking titties is kind of gay, you literally have to lower yourself so your head is below the girl's to do this, it's submissive.

>>212552927
I doubt he’d fucking eat them ffs

>mfw

>>212552767 (OP)
Oh, fuck off. Just show me the women naked and skip all the bullshit having men on screen and having retarded feminists do weird fake hypocritical jobs.

>>212552927
>have to make the metaphor incorrect and non-transferable by including the innately repugnant concept of homosexuality

>>212553232
I must be the zestiest man alive

>>212552767 (OP)
How many times will you make this thread?

>>212552767 (OP)
Names and sources?

>>212553232
andrew tate retard shit. sucking tits is pure kino

>>212552767 (OP)
coordinate what? If I'm an actor and want penis in vagina, NOTHING will stop me

>>212552767 (OP)
Useless and detrimental to the acting and the movie's overall results

I love sucking titties so much

>>212553232
not if you hold her up by her ass

>>212552767 (OP)
I feel I should be sucking those titties

>>212552767 (OP)
I don't think it should be done, it's just obscene and humiliating to everyone involved. It's something private you should do with your wife/husband.

>>212553299
It's the only way you'll understand it. The woman isn't craving every man ever sucking on her titties. You can't understand that she might object to the scene since in her place, you'd be thrilled for any woman to touch you in any way. Gotta break it down barney style for simpletons like yourself.

Theres too much redtape in film production these days, and that's why every film is shit. Regulations, unions and all that other shit ruined it. Oh you want fake firearms on set? You need to pay this boomer by the hour to supervise everything you do. You want to do a fight scene? Sorry, you need a coordinator and an ambulance crew at the ready at all times. You want to film here? That will be 500000 dollars plus tip, per day.

>>212553933
I don't think violence should be done, gunfights and explosions are just obscene and humiliating to everyone involved. They're something private which only should be done between conflicting parties.

>>212553176
In the Realm of the Senses

>>212553868
Same. Even better if they lactate just a tiny bit. Adds a little extra.
Man I love sucking tiddies.

>>212552767 (OP)
Post the one with that guy grabbing prime JCon's tit under her bra.

>>212554257
Violence can serve a purpose in stories, sex is just gratuitous. But if the violence is gratuitous then yes we'd be better off without it.

>>212553773
Ana de Armas, Kate Mara, Sydney Sweeney

>>212554216
then she should not be hired for the role, there are endless women who would be willing to do that role

>>212556890
I love them so much

I think they need to start cooordinating how and when those actresses are going to give the "intimacy" they OWE me
I mean us, they owe us

>>212552767 (OP)
>>intimacy coordinators
meme job, busy work for ugly women, I'll never have those school marm wenches on my set.

>>212552906
Sucking on titties isn't sex. And the sex isn't real.
Just like how the explosions in a lot of action films are real but the death isn't.

>>212552767 (OP)
Intimacy coordinators ruined sex in American film. It's often shocking watching new Asian or European kinos that still have great sex scenes and contrasting it with how sterile, awkward, and gross new American stuff is in comparison.

>>212552842
we know. It's why you're single.

>>212552883
>Retarded concept, do they use serial killers to give the guy who plays Dexter advice just so he understands the nuance of what it’s like to take someone’s life?
Yes? Are you retarded? Most actors will read up material on the person they are playing to get into the mindset, or even interview them in real life if possible. This isn't some secret knowledge, it's very common thing to do.

>>212552883
Women are weak and can't handle things by themselves, after 100+ years of feminism, they've decided they are incapable of responsibility, and it's a good thing.

>>212553559
1 billion

>>212557496
>Sucking on titties isn't sex.
yeah but its still hot as fuck

>>212557496
jizzing over her face isn't real sex either, it's just a bit of liquid.
it's just the same as having computer animated explosions that the actors can't see until the film's made.

>>212553232
>implying I don't rip her tits off and keep them as trophies
heh

>>212552767 (OP)
I think it’s rare when good looking rich people given an excuse to be intimate or fuck outright will turn it down as long as there are no reputational repercussions from it. Everyone needs to get over themselves, women especially, that sex is some dangerous thing in normal conditions such that it requires “intimacy coordinators” and shit. Women will want you to choke them, grab their hair, and drip spit in their mouth and then go “teehee I’m a delicate little flower :)” It’s nonsense and we’d be better off if the act was dropped.

>>212558692
>jizzing over her face isn't real sex either
It's a form of sexual activity (sucking on tits is foreplay at best). And you don't get it unsimulated in non-pornographic films.
>it's just the same as having computer animated explosions
You understand that a lot films have real explosions on set? Or are you so dumb you don't understand that not everything is vfx?

>>212558844
Most male actors aren't especially good looking. Sometimes you'll have your capeshit/action slop where they're forced to be ripped. But you can't honestly tell me with a straight face that someone like Mark Ruffalo would get a second glance from most women if he wasn't famous.
And I'm not calling him ugly. He's just very average. Like most actors.
And a lot of female actresses are also mid af.

>>212552767 (OP)
>Sex scenes in film
more of them yes thanks