>shifts your entire worldview in 3 hours

But that was a fantasy

No after all this bait of ~awareness expanding, he switched to being pro-regulation of "machines" ppl use (social media.)

>The BBC will willingly show you the hidden truth behind their (mass media's) manipulation of the public

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limited_hangout

>obvious limited hangout
no thanks bub

>>212598043
fuck you beat me to it lol

dude everything's so complicated and confusing. when i was a kid i believed the tv man but now i don't understand anything anymore.

>>212596343 (OP)
Required posting:

https://youtu.be/x1bX3F7uTrg?si=YIVSSTnY404HRSQu

>>212596343 (OP)
>duuude media isn't real and world events are presented as part of government narratives
Who didn't already know that ever since 9/11? kek

>>212598129
My Boomer dad recently expressed this exact sentiment to me. Now he thinks every actor went to Epstein's island. Can't watch a movie without him pointing and saying, "Yep. Epstein." I kinda wish he still thought the evening news was trustworthy.

>>212596343 (OP)
The only good thing about it is it shows Gaddafi somewhat favorably, so hopefully people look into how he was killed for daring to make his own bank. Everything else is pure shit

>>212596343 (OP)
Is the new Shifty shit worth a a shitty ? I don't give a fuck about britbongs.

>>212598129
Being confused is better than blindly choosing one of many competing narratives to take at face value, then arguing with people who picked a different one. You simply can't know the truth unless you've observed the relevant material reality, yet you can never see the things on the news for yourself. When it comes to current and historical events, you're stuck between trusting people with vested interests to tell you what's true, or simply not believing anything at all unless you've seen it yourself.
There are infinite degrees in between that depend on how trusting you are. Most people trust peer review and audit processes - surely something that is reviewed by many people in different organizations has a higher chance of actually being true. Or you might think they're all lying, but there is an objectively lower chance of that. Meanwhile, something only the government or only one specific interest group says has no guarantee of being true. You just have to decide how much trust and faith you can put it to believe something is true.

Of course the biggest pitfall is believing bullshit just because you want it to be true. Especially if you double down when it's revealed to be bullshit just because you don't want to accept that you fell for bullshit.

>>212598160
This mindbroke Curtoid

https://www.bitchute.com/video/7itjcgG8bLTc/
I liked how it handled music and style.

>>212598529
>Everything else is pure shit
Mr Goldstein pls

but then, something gay happened

>>212598245
He's sounds pretty based to me

>>212596343 (OP)
This was just whiny /pol/ bullshit

>>212598043
What's the problem? It's not like anybody's going to do anything about it, barely anybody cares

>>212596343 (OP)
I wish I was that weak-minded.

>>212598245
>every actor went to Epstein's island
might not be far off

>>212596343 (OP)
why do brits love and romanticize arabs so much?
it's like americans with niggers but more affectionate and less informed by pity

>>212598043
What is “Soft disclosure”?

>>212596343 (OP)
can any of you actually explain what's this about? I'm not watching a 3 hour video essay