>>212610834Peep Show revolutionised British sitcoms with its unique point-of-view filming style. I'm sorry you're a retard and can't see it. Ignoring the filming style, it also caused what
>>212610440talked about. The brutally honest exploration of modern life through the literal eyes of Mark and Jeremy ended up causing several more 'grounded' comedy series (such as Friday Night Dinner or Man Down). You can be ignorant if you want, but you're not making many good posts. You're probably going to make some nonsense post about how M.A.S.H had PoV shots or 30 Rock or something. But Peep Show combined PoV shots as being the MAJORITY of the show with internal monologues. Something that none of those shows did. The closest thing to Peep Show was the film Lady in the Lake (1948) which was shot nearly entirely PoV of the protag. But that's a film and didn't have internal monologues nor spawn the 'dry' and 'grounded' sitcoms which became popular post Peep Show.
>give ur head a wobble haha xDYour patter is shite, you just trot off what other mongs say. Clueless about shows, clueless about 'banter'.