>after seeing the positive rotten tomatoes scores i actually changed my mind
>as long as this movie is bringing joy and introducing Superman to new fans, I love and support it

>>212628062 (OP)

>this movie totally requires multiple viewings to truly grasp the depths of each character
>i definitely recommend going as much as you can, even if youj just go alone!

Traitorous Tomas

>>212628062 (OP)
>"Please, no more dislikes, no more unsubs"
What the fuck was he thinking hyping up this movie for a year just to give it a 6/10, didn't he know his audience?

>>212628132
Synder betrayed him with BvS.

>>212628062 (OP)
>>212628120
>most likely got threatened to get his sponsors removed
All because of that jew Corenswet

>>212628120
it honestly was better the second time as I was more used to the pacing and way the movie just throws you straight into the plot.

Spineless Santiago

>>212628062 (OP)
This man will suck dick for fame.

>>212628062 (OP)
Truly a honest review not even a gun was needed.

>>212628062 (OP)
He’s right tv is just being hipsters

Why are reviews like this. It’s getting the Barbie treatment

What's his name again? Agitated Alejandro?

>>212628369
Inmigrante Ilegal

>>212628120
I think I may go and see it twice, because as a huge Superman fan, I want to really understand how I feel about the movie.
After seeing it once, I think it's good, but lacked a good central theme. I definitely didn't like it as much as the original Superman movie.

>Mexican
>Hates Superman
>Sees White House Trump pic on X
>Pretends to see movie a second time and love it.

This dude just doesn't want a visit from ICE.

>>212628062 (OP)
looks like a joke to me

>>212628361
there are zero standards for working in the media lol. did they just retcon their own opinions in the same way?

>>212628422
uhhh what was the theme of the 1978 Superman? was it that time travel is really handy? genuine question btw.

>>212628487
>uhhh what was the theme of the 1978 Superman?
The theme was Gene Hackman is really entertaining when he's chewing the scenery

>>212628135

the amount of random
>SUPERMAN IS COMING SOON GUYS
videos in just the recent months all while wearing this same outfit is insane, i could buy the trailer release... but he literally has "reminder to go see the film guys!"videos in just the last month or so, completely out of his normal "wait for just big reviews so my presence means something"

there's zero way that was organic, because he didn't do that for any of the other recent Superman movies

>>212628487
It's about the value of earnest kindness in a cynical world. About optimism, the belief that most people are good and that if good people applied themselves the world would be better.

Clark Kent is mocked when he goes to Metropolis, which starts as this dingy city where Lois Lane is writing about massacres, rapists, and corruption. They mock him for sending money back to his mother in Kansas, saying 'swell' and whatnot.

And even when the themes aren't as profound, the score and the delightful slow and romantic moments make the movie so lovely and epic. It's a wonderful celebration of everything Superman is.
Great movie.

>>212628207
>"I don't like this movie"
>"JEW! IT'S BECAUSE THEY KILL THE ISRAELI PRESIDENT"
>"ok I do like this movie"
>"JEW! IT'S BECAUSE THE LEAD IS A JEW!"
thank god I'm not insane so can just like or dislike things using my own personal taste and sense of aesthetics instead of calculating which opinion I think "the jews" want me to have and then fanatically championing the opposite view regardless of what I actually feel

>>212628688
really you're just describing superman. I thought you meant themes specific to the 1978 film itself.

Man Of Steel was cancer with the "morality is a evolutionary weakness" atheism opposing the Kal-El jesus imagery, and that awfully forced shit was specific to the movie itself. by the time Batman v Superman gave us "can a god bleed" I was praying for Zack Snyder and David Goyer to both die in a submarine accident.

>>212628644
>there's zero way that was organic, because he didn't do that for any of the other recent Superman movies
He's desperate for this one to do well enough to earn more sequels. This movie failing means we won't get another superman film for at least a couple more decades.

>>212628688
the world depicted in 1978 isn't really very cynical. I definitely remember some of the stuff you're referring too but overall its really a very gentle film until Lois falls into a crack.

>>212628644
>the other recent Superman movies
the what?

>>212628120
U

>>212628062 (OP)
It's a movie for white folks but I suppose people like him can get it after a few tries.

He did the same thing with alita. He is not a good film critic. He can't handle having his own opinion and always caves to whatever his comments say.

>>212628831
>This movie failing means we won't get another superman film for at least a couple more decades.

it really does depend on long-term market research tracking. if it restores the Superman brand over time it will have done its job.

of course it will need to actually find an audience and we've seen that that is more about having some kind of dumb "CHICKEN JOCKEY" effect than quality. and I don't know to what extent people even watch movies for anything except memes at this point.

>Snyderbro forced to KNEEL by the majority
That's hilarious

>>212628954
he doesn't really have his own opinion. the movie isn't a 6/10, he only gave it a low review because WB didn't want to pay him extra for a higher score.

note that Critical Drinker hasn't even reviewed the film yet, for the same reason: no money no promotion.

>>212628964
>of course it will need to actually find an audience and we've seen that that is more about having some kind of dumb "CHICKEN JOCKEY" effect than quality.
The hawkgirl screech scene has potential. Just have to wait to see if the zoomer tiktok algo swings our way

>>212628426
he's mexcian? dude looks iranian

>>212629013
6/10 IS a high score for this movie

>>212628487
I always thought the ending negated the entire movie

>>212628062 (OP)
Shill Sanchez

>>212628062 (OP)
his verdict rose to a 7/10. this screenshot is out of context. He was saying if it makes you a superman fan, it's a 10/10 for you.

>>212628062 (OP)
Hey I remember this guy from thatguywiththeglasses/channel awesome. He's still around doing reviews? Angry Joe Davola

I dont watch cape slop but I find it funny how this board bashes DC way more than marvel kek

>>212628831

the actual real reason we're getting capeslop is because all these copyrights are literally ending within this decade,

you already saw original Mickey mouse design, and winny the poo and some others, they've reached the Max lengths (which was able to get extended by Congress in the 90s) but 95 years is now the max and they already said government is not extending it again.

so its been a slop train for the last few years to milk the last few cents.

>>212628062 (OP)
>hollywood slop shill, shills for more access to hollywood slop

Oh boy, am I shocked.

They both gave it a B.

Douge also clarified that by "Supermans parents" he meant Jor-L and Lara leading to a humorous moment between the chromedomes.

>>212628798
>really you're just describing superman.
Yeah, and the 78 film was all about the themes of Superman.

>>212629396
number of good dc films in last 40 years: 0
number of good marvel films in last 40 years: 4 or 5 (raimi spiderman 1 & 2, blade, iron man 1, winter soldier, maybe couple other watchable ones from early mcu stuff)

they are shit on for a reason.

>>212628062 (OP)
This is pathetic.

>>212628120
>>212628062 (OP)
>Got paid by Yids to shill the worst Superman movie
Poor pissed-off-Pablo

>>212628426
>>Hates Superman
His whole persona has been as a superman fan in the vidya world

>>212628120
He gave a positive review to suicide squad 2016

>>212628062 (OP)
>>212628120

americans are mentally ill, the soviets should have nuked that shithole into oblivion

>>212631181
>persona
that's the key word

>>212628062 (OP)
Angry taco shilling again

>>212628254
Cowardly Carlito

>>212628062 (OP)
Supposedly this movie gets way better on second viewings, the major criticism of it was there were way too many characters, once you see it twice you see how all the plotlines fit together. I still haven't seen it.

>>212631703
you don't need to see it twice, the plot and character motivations really aren't confusing

>>212631309
calm down, nigel; you don't want to get a pop-in from the bobbies

>>212629331
this

>>212631703
it's more that we're so used to capeshit being formulaic that your brain rebels at one not having the exact same origin story structure as all the others.

once you get past the 30 minute twist the film totally settles into gear and it feels completely normal. the last act is quite busy and the resolution makes sure every characters gets a "50 points for Gryffindor!" style catharsis moment, but the issues are very minor and mostly just a side effect of the story having lots of moving parts.

>>212628062 (OP)
Doesn't seem so angry

>>212629331
he's hedging his bets because he's a fucking pussy and didn't even sincerely believe his initial review.

This is pathetic. But still less pathetic than posting on /tv/