Is this the perfect movie trilogy?
The best ever made?

It flows so well from one movie to the next, they all work very well together, or can also work by themselves, and they are all absolute kinomatography of the highest order.

>>212632777 (OP)
No. And no. It works okish, I guess, but the Biff plothole is dumb as in, they got lazy, but having said that, Part II came out way better than it had any right to be. Now, Part III is another creature altogether because it's a western and somehow manages to be the one that ages the best. No, I don't like the original as much as I used to. No, not knocking anything in it, just saying it's overrated.

>>212632777 (OP)
Those posters have been blowing my mind since 1990.

>>212632978
Darth Vader is mentioned twice in the original that came out in 1985 that was competing with Return of the Jedi (films back then were in theaters for almost all year if it was good) and his helmet is most likely intentionally outlined with Marty's door in the first poster.

>>212632777 (OP)
3 was pretty bad compared to the other two
When thinking about a perfect trilogy Star Wars 4-6 comes to mind.

>>212632777 (OP)
The first movie is an almost perfect script for a fantasy adventure. The sequels are solid but don't have nearly the fun or wonderment.

nah. Star Wars has perfected the trilogy format: one great film, one good film, then one bad film.

this is one great film, half of a good film, then one bad film.

>>212633043
when you watch the news, do they leave secret messages hidden in patterns, just for you?

>>212633162
>two different movie characters fully say "Darth Vader" in film
>anon infers that I'm insane

lol ok, jew.

>>212632777 (OP)
Yeah, I liked all three of them a lot. Just good solid fun adventure movies.

>>212632777 (OP)
i'm surprised hollywood was able to contain their greed and never made another movie out of respect for michael fox

>>212633090
No, sublime film, great film, then another great film.

>>212633201
I think anon is referring to you seeing the Virgin Mary on a movie poster.

>>212633201
look i can ALMOST see what you mean about the door. if anything, it looks more like the destroyed Darth Vader helmet in The Force Awakens trailer (obviously unintentional unless they had actual time travel).

on balance, Drew Struzan just drew a door.

>>212633326
Zemeckis has a contract forbidding BTTF remakes until he dies.

>>212633332
Do you really not understand how popular Star Wars was in the mid-80s? Of course they designed the poster to evoke part of Vader's helmet and mask, of course it's not a coincidence that the film was released when RotJ had its first re-release, and they literally say "Darth Vader" from two different characters in two different scenes.

>>212633380
Right, I didn't say it's exactly it, but they made sure you got the general shape of the helmet in the poster so that Star Wars fans would be more likely to see it.

>>212632777 (OP)
>the perfect movie trilogy?
>The best ever made?

>>212633415
Having lived through the entirety of the 1980s, I definitely don't understand the cultural significance of the Star Wars franchise. It's not that you're seeing something that doesn't exist.

>>212633515
>Having lived through the entirety of the 1980s
Something tells me you were born in 1980 and recall nearly nothing of them otherwise you wouldn't be saying that. Star Wars healed the nation, it healed racial wounds, you have no idea. Everyone loved it. EVERYONE.
My grandparents loved it. My dad loved it. My mom loved it. Every single kid at school loved them. Every teacher loved them.
It was a time when everyone was right for once.
And I'm just saying that the makers of BttF capitalized on it a bit.

>>212632777 (OP)
1 and 2 are good, 3 is watchable but nowhere near the same quality.
perhaps should have been left as two films

>>212633599
>Star Wars was very popular in the 1980s
Yes.

>Darth Vader's helmet was intentionally included in the movie poster for Back to the Future
No.

>>212633756
>No.
Yes. Final say. You just know or you don't. Like, you either lived in the 70s and 80s or you didn't, and you didn't.

>>212633786
May we see it?

>>212633822
My time machine? Sorry, it's internal and cannot be shared with anyone.

>>212632777 (OP)
/tv/ says it's the fifth best trilogy

>>212633415
don't listen to the other guy.
luke's light sabre is also in the picture in the folds of marty's clothing.
there was a lot of crossover between film poster painters in those days, see also the tie fighter shape in the second picture on doc.
back to the future' s French title is also an anagram of the French title for starwars.

>>212633972
>Bored of the Rings beating the OT SW trilogy

LOL!

>>212633786
I have never once thought or seen the darth Vader helmet in the Bttf poster. As far as the reference to Darth Vader Marty also says he’s from the planet Vulcan. Ripping off Star Trek success too? Maybe it’s just dialogue?

>>212633972
>Star Bores beating the Godfather trilogy

LOL!

>>212633972
didn't know there was a before midnight. only seen the first one so far, it was really good and hit close to home

>>212633415
>>212633455
i can't tell if this is a bit, or you are actually insane.

>>212634027
>luke's light sabre is also in the picture in the folds of marty's clothing.
>there was a lot of crossover between film poster painters in those days, see also the tie fighter shape in the second picture on doc.
>back to the future' s French title is also an anagram of the French title for starwars.

I think you're mocking me now. lol Otherwise, please point out the TIE Fighter. The saber thing I can almost see, but that may just be suggestion.

>>212634036
the fire in the first poster clearly looks like the enterprise

>>212634027
don't forget that 'Back' follows a similar phonetic convention to 'Luke', and 'Future' = 'father' = 'Vader'.

if you don't see how that was intentional, you don't realise just how important Star Wars was.

>>212634120
-t. jew who ignores that Darth Vader is said twice in the film;etc

It's funny and sad that "common" observations made my scores of people decades ago is now called insane because gate-keepers have tiny brains.

>>212634139
mini r2d2s in the third picture too
the more you look, the more references there are.

>>212634196
>gate-keepers have tiny brains.
You know who else has a tiny brain?

That's right, Biff from Back to the Future.

>88 miles per hour
how did that make it into a film? i know Jesus = 888, here is video proof:
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=jesus+888
but 88 minus the 8 digit (also 888 - 800, a holy number corrupted by whores) is Hitler and sinful

>>212634244
You can't tell me that they weren't thinking of a certain jew-sucking retard when they made part II.

>>212634244
>Biff
>Bttf

>>212634272
8 looks like an infinity symbol, so that's probably why they did it.

>>212633383
>>212633326
I remember back in 2011 or so they did a series of ad campaigns with Doc Brown for the electronics store Garbarino here in Argentina (BTTF was huge here back in the 1980s-1990s)... AFAIK it's the last time he ever played the character.
Advertising slop, but cute.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5iK83wP3HjE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=doEQefIawpA

>>212634098
in your 20s the first one hits close to home, in your 30s the second one does, i'm not old enough for the third one but it was still kino

>>212634179
>doc - is old, like obiwan
>marty - his disciple, has to learn the ways of time travel during the films until he becomes a jedi in the third one
doc even sacrifices himself to the evil ones in the first one in the same one, just stands there like obiwan does with the dark lord of the sith.
>marty seeking out his father's past, 30 years before - exactly the same time frame as the clone wars from the first film
>luke kissing his sister, marty kissing his mother
>biff = sith, sounds exactly the same
>flying cars look exactly like xwings
>mayor goldie - emperor palpatine

>>212634364
There was some other short campaign where they got Michael J. Fox to sit in a Delorean and it managed to fool many that a new BttF film was coming. It was set up like a trailer.

>>212632777 (OP)
Back to the Future is peak Gen-X manchild core

>>212633972
>star trek 2, 3 and 4
holy fucking based

>>212634364
>____ was huge here in South America!
>it became advertising slop kino
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msDp_k-Fid4

>>212634435
>luke kissing his sister, marty kissing his mother
I mean I guess I can see the resembl

>mayor goldie - emperor palpatine
HO LEE FUK

>>212634394
liked the second one the most since I was 10-12, the future scenes made it.

>>212634603
>>mayor goldie - emperor palpatine
*Dark* secrets only the Sith knew....

>>212634607
learn to read a thread, dumbass

>>212634501
Yes I remember that, it was about the same time, so people were hyped it was all teasers for a new movie (back when new movies weren't necessarily a sign of slop and you could be hopeful about them)

>>212634565
cute

>>212632777 (OP)
First film is a close as you can get to a perfect movie for what it is. It's incredible really.

2nd film was kinda bunked from the start, the actor who played the dad couldn't be in it (wanted more money) and they had to do work arounds with footage from the original, which actually made for a lot of really cool shots and effects, it had potential to be the greatest sequel of all time but they spend too long in the future world scenes and they were way over the top and while fun, just didn't hit the same way. making biff a super villain was just bad, I like the actor but his character was just far to unbelievable though but his fault, shouldn't have been the plot at all.

3rd one was just a western in the same universe, and the best part of the movie is when he's in 1955 the first 10 minutes.

Perfect trilogy would be be movie 1, 2nd half of movie 2 or just edits, then if you want more but different watch 3.

>>212634721
>the actor who played the dad couldn't be in it (wanted more money)
eat shit, dishonest zemeckis faggot

>>212632777 (OP)
Never got this meme, the second film is just a rehash of the first film and the third is shit. Only the first film is any good.

might play the New Hope soundtrack over Back to the Future. see if it lines up.

>>212634721
>3rd one was just a western in the same universe
How many westerns have the plot of "trying to keep the timeline from falling apart by using knowledge of the future?"

>>212634799
So am I wrong about that?
Qrd?

>>212634811
>the second film is just a rehash of the first film
not really, only like 1/3 is spent back in 1955 and it does a good enough job of making it interesting despite re-hashing the first movie.

>>212632777 (OP)
When Marty tells the Doc he's from 30 years from now (1955) the Doc says, " my goodness I invented something that actually works and I am still alive in 30 years from now".
He was worried he was going to kill himself but seeing Marty and knowing he would be friends with him in 30 years time and gave him hope and he continued on.
Bloody hell that is poignant, makes me sad thinking about it everytime.

>>212633972
ha ha.

>>212635032
this didn't happen, retard.

>>212635109
It did, watch it again. It's subtle but it's there.

>>212634811
>the second film is just a rehash of the first film
Only the last 30 min and that's the best part, it should have been the whole movie. It was already brilliant doing what they did with it but imagine the whole movie being near misses and setups from the first film where the characters luck out but it was actually their future selves, they really missed that opportunity, but they couldn't do that because they didn't have the whole cast back.
All that to say, I loved 1, perfect movie. 2 and 3 are okay but nowhere near as good.

>>212633972
ho ho.

>>212635365
>Bro what if the camera never stops shaking so no one can tell whats going on

>>212635365
I've seen all three of these and I can't remember a single thing about them other than he doesn't remember that he's an agent and then he gets shot at for it.

>>212635096
ew

>>212635527
and why should i care, lowIQ anon?

>>212634689
>people were hyped it was all teasers for a new movie (back when new movies weren't necessarily a sign of slop and you could be hopeful about them)

Had a friend who was heartbroken when he learned it wasn't happening because that "trailer" got him convinced. It was decent, but towards the end I knew it was false.

Just you watch. When Robert Zemeckis passes away, Disney will buy it and release their own trilogy to capitalize on it.

>>212635701
Black to da Culta
>"Great Wakanda!"
>Whoa, Doc, this shit be kickin my headspace!"

>>212632777 (OP)
The one fault I can find is that the character flaw about getting called "chicken" only shows up in the second and third movie.

>>212635749
More like doc brown actually stole the idea from a black woman and changed hs name to brown because of her and not because he was a vanbraun, she's a poor woman in this timeline.
They go back in time to give her credit and save her and she becomes basically Elon musk type figure after they return. Same thing they did with Wonka

>>212632978
I remember seeing the VHS boxes with them as a kid at blockbuster and thinking it was the coolest thing

>>212634685
>was probably confused by hoverboards
get a grip, lamer

>>212634394
doc was pretty old in the first one even he has grey hair

>>212635872
>doc brown actually stole the idea from a black woman and changed hs name to brown because of her
KINO.

>>212636348
you're a fucking retard

>>212636609
>can't follow a time travel plot
>calls others 'ritarded'

>>212635096
>a cartroon for troons that think they're "lesbians" or "transbians" or whatever the fuck
kek

>>212632777 (OP)
The sequels have one major flaw, no Crispin Glover. He was such a major character in the first movie. I think the series would have been literally perfect if he was in the last two movies.

>>212637406
>see the first one
>think the dad acts really weirdly
>find out later it's just how the actor is

pirates of the carribean is

>>212632777 (OP)
https://youtube.com/shorts/7axvejT6OWE
https://youtube.com/shorts/lJoYJFvDYIs

>>212633972
>no Dollars trilogy
What the fuck

Why do people hate on the third one? It's not as good as the first 2 but it's still fun and a nice closure to the trilogy

>>212639086
The third one is the weaker one, like Indy 2.

>>212633972
Apes is the best trilogy

>>212638514
I agree, we have to evaluate trilogy, not individual films, so it has to be judged by 3 films followed in a row and in a short span of time.

>>212632777 (OP)
Only the first two work particularly because they are perfect scripts regarding plot, the time travel loop, and putting in esoteric symbolism about 9/11 and Trump and Roswell. The third is a psuedo-western based on a plothole (Marty doesn't need to go to 1885 to save Doc, he could just tell 1955 Doc not to get shot by Buford)

>>212634272
88 refers to the analemma of the sun and moon or Joachim and Boaz which is a big Freemason thing. The whole film is chock-full of Esoteric knowledge.

>>212640117

its not a trilogy though anon, theyre making more ape movies thus its not just 3 movies

>>212634878
Crispin Glover was the actor for George McFly and a big beef he had with the first film was that in the alternate timeline they get rich and that sends a bad message. He also got paid half of what Thompson and Wilson got despite the fact BTTF 2 was guaranteed to be one of the biggest films of the year. As a result they decided to use the face molds from his prosthetic makeup from 1 to create a mask to put over another actor in 2. Which is a HUGE no-no and made Glover sue and then set a standard regarding likeness rights. Glover also penned an essay in the 90s called "What Is It?"
>Do Steven Spielberg’s passions burn? Do passions burn in the man now imprisoned who wished to anally rape Steven Spielberg? Do our cultural mouthpieces confidently inform us that the wish to anally rape Steven Spielberg is a bad thought? Could anal rape of Steven Spielberg be simply the manifestation of a cultural mandate? Do you believe Steven Spielberg is an ideal guide and influence for our culture? Do Steven Spielberg’s films question our culture? What do Steven Spielberg’s films question? Does Steven Spielberg focus much of his fantasy life on young people? Did he portray children wallowing in sewers filled with fecal matter in Schindler’s List? Did he use children to finger paint an adult in Hook? Does he collect the illustrations of Norman Rockwell, such as the one showing a young boy in his underwear examined by a doctor? Are the inclinations of Steven Spielberg above suspicion by the media-fed culture?

>>212639025
it's not a real trilogy, moron

>>212640117
zoomer moment

>>212633043
>Schizo obsessed with signs and jews
Y I K E S

>>212641672
>its not a trilogy
it is, in the same way
star wars
LOTR
indiana jones
batman
star trek
mad max
and others.

>>212632777 (OP)
No

1 is literally perfect, 2 is great, 3 is merely decent

The only truly perfect movie trilogy is Star Wars OT

>>212642796
those trilogies are good though and the apes trilogy is embarrasing slop for retards (like you)

>>212632777 (OP)
The sequels are utterly pointless and nowhere near as good.
>>212632978
They represent the quality of the movies themselves and the downright laziness of the trilogy as a whole.
First one - amazing
Second one - Same shit with a slight change
Third one - Same shit again except now marty is wearing a hat.

>>212632777 (OP)
Yes adn yes

>>212632777 (OP)
yeah they are all great, Roger and Ebert criticised Part II for being too gadget-filled but I think 3 fixed all that. I try to watch Part III without thinking about the Saturday morning cartoon show.

>>212632777 (OP)
Three is shit.
One and two are awesome.