What went so wrong?

>>212659851 (OP)
Hideous

>>212659887
But enough about you

>>212659851 (OP)
It was made solely because they thought there would be a good market for it rather than because they had any desire or intention of making a good show. Insanely low effort slop made by already unfunny controlled opposition shills.

At least that's what I assume I never watched it.

Pilot it's a decent blend between King Of The Hill and Regular Show. Can't find it anywhere tho.

>>212659851 (OP)
It wasn't funny. If they actually tried with the comedy instead of going for such low hanging fruit it probably would've done better. Pic related was pretty conservative but the first season was still really funny. After the original oldest daughter got fired I lost interest but my point still stands. It was funny and Birchum wasn't.

conservatards can't do art

And what of good The New Norm?

It was a funny character on local LA radio thirty years ago (actually netted Carolla the Loveline gig). But holy shit what desperately deep dig for ideas.

>>212659851 (OP)
It is not an actual conservative ideology based on consistent beliefs and knowledge like Yukio Mishima or Dostoevsky, but “conservative art” created by cringe reactionary and anti-intellectualism.

>>212659983
i watched half of the pilot and you're spot on

>>212660105
Yeah the original pilot from a decade ago wasn't half bad, I dunno why they keep trying to make cartoons to appeal to MAGA, those people don't actually want entertainment they just want shit to bitch about.

>>212659851 (OP)
Republicans dont have the capacity to be funny. They are fueled purely by hate, spite and paranoia while also being too low IQ to make clever observations

>>212662002
t. confused about genders