I hate this show because it gaslit me into believing people having friends like this was normal.

>>212663328 (OP)
Uh, you don’t get to post friends

Seinfeld board.
That means NOT WELCOME

>>212663328 (OP)
>gaslit
What's with the trend of broccoli heads inventing new words for ones that already exist?

>>212663474
>Terrible show that appeals to the lowest common denominator
>Unfunny stagnant characters that never change, develop or grow
>Kramer guy was so irrelevant he had to go on a racial screed to stay in the limelight

>>212663514
What word already existed that means the same thing as gaslighting?

>>212663474
Seinfeld is literally the big bang theory of the 90s

>>212663655
>never change, develop or grow
That was very intentionally the concept, yes.
And it was revolutionary because nobody else did it.
No hugs, no lessons.

>>212663699
I'm aware their fuckup was intentional and that's why there's no excuse. Watching four assholes who never change is boring because nothing that happens to them affects them in any way. So it gets boring real fucking quick

>>212663328 (OP)
even if the show had a "friend success rate" of 0.01% it did more good for human kind than the rest of television shows combined (including Seinfeld)

>>212663765
It affects those around them. That's the comedy.
They fuck up everybody's life but theirs.

>>212663765
Character "growth" is fucking cringe and always makes characters worse and less interesting

>>212663699
that's no excuse
for a "show about nothing" it's about gosh darn lotsa things
you could do tons of stuff with that (no hugs/lessons) concept yet they chose to be agitated and stinky
very bad. very very bad.

>>212663789
>It affects unimportant secondary characters who the four assholes also don't care about
Whoopee

>>212663474
Seinfeld was boring as fuck.
Not to mention you had to be a Jew Yorker to understand most of the shit they were kvetching about.

>>212663814
Just because Seinfeld doesn't have it doesn't mean you have to cry over it and pretend something as important as character growth is irrelevant

>>212663699
>And it was revolutionary because nobody else did it.
They did, they just didn't intellectualize it and give it a gay slogan. Married with Children had tons of episodes like that.

>>212663514
Think before you post.

>>212663935
That's a noun not a verb you retarded broccoli head.
Pls log off the internet and log off IRL as well

>>212663862
And do you think Married With Children is shit too?

>>212663680
In the context of OP you could use manipulated or tricked.

>>212664273
It gets old quick for a lot of the same reasons

>>212664273
I don't think either is shit, I just think the Seinfeld writers were up their own asses and boxed themselves in for no reason.