>>212693964Except you don't fucking speak English and you've fallen into the common trap of not knowing inartistically that most English words can have half a dozen completely different meanings and the only way to understand is context clues and having grown up speaking the language your entire life.
Otherwise you literally always have this problem.
It's the same thing when I see turbo ESLs say:
>it'sIn response to a question.
They of course mean the affirmative:
>It isAnd since they have basic, perhaps, textbook summarized understanding of contractions and that they can just always be used whenever the two parent words are present. But they can't, because that's not how people speak English.