>>212721813>Lex Luthor therefore, the man of speech, is a figure of subversion and opposition who characterizes the imperfect relationship of human speech and the corruptible mass.Luthor is the anti-Superman this guy accidentally describes Doomsday as given he's supposed to represent Gnosis fighting an unwinnable, eternal war against God.
As a matter of fact, I think a lot of this movie would be more interesting and make actual sense if Snyder framed it as Christianity/Zoroastrianism vs. Gnosticism.
>It is Luthor’s Promethean spirit that corrupts Batman through subversion and ignorance and gives him a faulty perception of realityIf anything Luthor here represents either Gnosis or the Devil here, not Prometheus or any other Greek stuff.
>Batman himself is a very “Freudian” characterIf anything he's a Jungian one given Batman/Bruce Wayne represents the Persona and Shadow perfectly. I have no clue where this guy got anything Freudian from him even after reading this.
>Martha (a name that resonates with biblical symbolism)Except the Biblical Martha doesn't relate to the story at all, espceially in a Freudian context like this guy suggests given Freudianism is inherently at odds with Christianity.
>Batman is the centurion who was the first to cry out “Really, this was the Son of God!”. Are you serious lmao.
Really, this is all I expected: somebody well-read who is reading far, far too much into a convoluted, poorly executed, and bizarrely pedantic film to the point of apophenia.