>Gobekli Tepe
>Olmec Heads
>True North
>Spring Equinox
>Ayahuasca
>Younger Dry Ass
Wow..... thank you Graham Hancock for """enlightening""" us all about real history
I love how angry redditors get about his theories
>>212741441It's so clear that threads like this are started by redditors angry about other redditors. These, that chef who offed himself, that Scottish movie guy, etc.
>>212741499Wrong. Hancock and Bourdain threads are /tv/ lore at this point
>Scottish movie guyNo fucking clue who you're talking about
Get this thread down or else, turd.
>what if this ancient civilization didn't figure things out on their own, and instead there was an even more ancient civilization that taught them everything they know... that figured everything out on their own
>what if all of the evidence across many fields and disciplines researching history over different parts of the world is all wrong, and I'm right
>what if this rudimentary symbol of a snake (wavy line) in one temple is related to a rudimentary symbol of a snake (wavy line) in another temple, which means a globe-spanning civilization existed
>what if there was a civilization that spread throughout the entire planet, but left no trace whatsoever because they built everything out of paper mache only on the coastline, leaving on inland trace, roads, mines, artifacts, no trace whatsoever
>what if the proof for this ancient civilization is super well hidden just outside of view and to prove it you have to inspect every grain of sand in the sahara, otherwise you just can't tell
What do you mean proof? I'm just asking questions...
