>>212814325 (OP) yeah digital sucks but it's easier to work with and ultimately convenience will always win.
Anonymous
7/17/2025, 5:38:40 PM No.212816284
>>212814325 (OP) Yes, he had some of the oners in the history of cinema.
Anonymous
7/17/2025, 6:13:38 PM No.212817352
>>212814325 (OP) digital can look great but digital encourages laziness wheares shooting on film actually requires talent. well at least it did. because whatever the fuck nolan does is not "shooting on film"
Anonymous
7/17/2025, 6:19:47 PM No.212817538
>>212814325 (OP) never 4get https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MZv4Fvv5-Hw
>>212814325 (OP) I mean, that has more to do with the people directing modern movies than with the digital medium. I'll listen to whatever Brian DePalma has to say about lighting, though. That was always one of the highest points of his movies.
>>212818286 He is one of the only directors that actually knew about lighting and camera lenses. He was just a director that said what his vision was, he showcased it. Watch his interview on Dick Cavett, DePalma was an filmmaker, not just a director.