They really went from
>AI is bad because it will take its duties too seriously
To
>AI must be guided into having a moral compass

>>212861591 (OP)
she doesn't have a moral compass in the second movie wtf are u talking about she's still happy murdering people left and right

Wrong, it was
>AI can be used by good people for good, and by bad people for bad
>also CEOs are all bad

Essentially the same message as 1984. Fun fact, the book never once condems technology, like a lot of people seem to think. People think the story is about "Technology=Bad!" but it's about how evil men will use whatever tool at their disposal to dehumanize and torture into submission their own kind.

>>212861591 (OP)
They should make a movie like this, but she's a transwoman instead.

>>212861661
She doesn't kill in the 2nd movie, just incapacitates.

>>212861591 (OP)
>ai booba
I will now watch your AI slop.

>>212862138
She made Gemma take her inhibitor out so she could kill people

>>212862091
>People think the story is about "Technology=Bad
absolutely nobody thinks that. good idea to create a fictional counterparty that's more retarded than you to boost your self regard, but keep it inside your head please

>>212861591 (OP)
>AI must be guided into having a moral compass
Why does every unfettered AI inevitably become a nazi sympathizer?

>>212862970
>pure facts lead to logical conclusions
it's a mystery

>>212861591 (OP)
is she holding a big dildo?