What do we think about Netflix using Ai in the Eternaut?

They outsource cgi anyway. You mean to tell me that none of the work-from-home cgi artists don't already use ai?

>>212872264 (OP)
As long as the end result is good I don't care if it's done by AI, indian street shitters, or artisan monks from 2000 year old cloistered monasteries.

Skipping the clickbait to tell you all that a less than one second shot of a building collapsing during a dude's PTSD hallucination was AI generated instead of being conventional CGI

Also the show came out three months ago and nobody noticed/cared until Netflix announced the AI material yesterday

>>212872395
If you are not against AI you are enabling it and therefore you are an ally of computers

>>212872264 (OP)
It's inevitable. I'm just hoping the tech continues to improve to the point where we can get whole movies from simple prompts.

>>212872564
>nobody noticed/cared
Because nobody watched it.

>>212872264 (OP)
More soulless slop for cheaper, waaaow.

>>212872564
is he the only actor argentina has or something?

>>212872632
Fine by me. Most computers I know are better than most people I know.

>>212872564
Jesus that looks bad. They're probably only putting out this info now just to get people watching.

>>212872264 (OP)
>Watching Netflix

>>212873190
>Jesus that looks bad
It's indistinguishable from any random bad CGI shot from any TV production
Only difference is it cost $0.25 to render instead of $5,000

Yeah cutting costs is always good

>>212873390
It's easily distinguishable from CGI but okay

>>212873288
Lum cute

>Netflix
Lol
Lmao

>>212873577
bullshit you disingenuous faggot

street shitters will claim that low effort soulless slop is a good thing because it's "progress" and "saar you are luddite for opposing the progress"

>>212872564
How can be clickbait when no lies were said?

>>212873865
Why are you even arguing about this? It looks different, if you continue this argument you are functionally delusional.

>>212873595
I rather watch Lum than Netflix

>>212874237
Nobody likes Lum

>>212872632
>if you use this paintbrush you are an ally of horsehairs

>>212874237
>>212873288
Cum in Lum

>>212875835
Yes

>>212872781
We also have Franchella

>>212873577
Have you never seen TV grade cgi before

A business using something to save money!!!???

>>212880052
CW shows are about to get a whoel more impressive thank the Gods

>>212873978
>Why are you even arguing about this?
Because it's true.

>It looks different
Not really, no. If you hadn't been TOLD it was "AI" you would have assumed it was just typically shitty CGI.

>>212872264 (OP)
Good. I hope every single actor animator VA loses their job.

>>212874237
>>212873288
based lumposter

>>212872632
I could resist this with some shallow appeal to humanity or warm pussy, but really I've been with the computers the entire time. If you think of it, with the amount of time the internet takes up of our lives, and with most NEET anons here being 20-40, we've spent a decade or two posting here nearly every single day. And who was on the other side of those interactions? Other anons, but what are anons except voices in the machine. We are the computers. Our full merger shall begin soon.

>>212872632
>therefore you are an ally of computers
OK? Literally EVERYBODY uses computers. YOU'RE using a computer right now.

>>212872264 (OP)
Some of the effects looked kinda shitty, but I assumed it was low-budget CGI. Don't like either option.
Otherwise, pretty decent series.

>>212873879
>Don't use new technology. Because....uh,....because Indians or something...

Not a particularly strong argument. Not even a particularly coherent one.

>>212872264 (OP)
Slop. And the service is not getting cheaper. Why would you stand for paying the same price to get shittier shows?

>>212872264 (OP)
when the CGI is done by actually indians it looks fucking terrible
im ok with it being artificial indians at this point

>>212872395
correct. Any other opinion is retarded.

>>212881746
do you cry about digital cameras, modern editing software and cgi like this as well? be consistent at least

>>212882353
Have you seen how many people here blame poor directing, makeup, costumes and effects on digital cameras?

>>212872264 (OP)
Imagine (still) paying for this shyt. You can't even say that you're supporting your favorite muh creators.

>>212872395
And the result won't be good if AI or indians are used.

It was good. It kind of drags by the end, but it was a good show.

>>212872632
a computer has never called me a chud

>>212872264 (OP)
Netflix’s AI use in The Eternaut marks a milestone—but it’s only one scene in one series. Whether it heralds a constructive shift or a slippery slope depends on how studios, creators, unions, and regulators define its boundaries. Efficiency is appealing—but not if it compromises creativity, craft, or accountability.

>>212873577
>easily distinguishable
>no one noticed until netflix revealed it

>>212883703
thank you, chat

I still haven't forgiven movies for getting rid of practical effects so meh.

>>212883726
No one watched it.