>>212950996>You're telling me, out of pure contrarianism, I'm supposed to support displacing white working class folk by importing millions of Africans Into my communities to work as slaves?It isn’t quite like that. The first people brought in to work the tobacco plantations in Virginia were down on their luck whites from England. The problem is they weren’t treated much better than the later slaves were. They could get some land after three years, but many of them didn’t even make it that long. Word eventually got out in England about how shitty a deal it was, so interest in it dried up. That’s when the slaves were brought in. So they were unironically doing jobs the whites didn’t want to do.
>And millions of whites died in a pointless war to to protect the plantation owners assets when slavery was banned?It was much more than just a few rich plantation owners. Around 25% of southern households owned at least one slave. For the rest of them, their country being at war was enough for them to fight. Many of these were the hyper patriotic boarderlanders from Scotland and Northern England.
>What part of this could POSSIBLY be considered ethical or in my best interest to support?That’s actually the magic (and to others, the danger) of Gone With the Wind to me. It presents the old south as this chivalry wonderland, and it actually succeeds. The slaves have a good old time and things aren’t too bad for their owners either, but they face an existential threat.