How?

I assume you were born yesterday. they have vids on YT about the massive structure they built that rotated, etc.

>>213088539 (OP)
Faked with camera tricks. If that was real he would have gone rippen through the ceiling.

short words for you, camera stay same spot, set spin like wheel

Same way Bear Grylls crew made it look like he was always about to fall off a mountain

>>213088669
But who was wheel?

>>213088714
so it's just angles? sort of like how every interracial porn has huge black cocks?

>>213088539 (OP)
Anti-gravity tech demo for another film of his that premiered the following year

>>213088539 (OP)
woah

>>213088539 (OP)
Try spinning, that's a good trick.

>>213088608
not OP, I've seen that but it doesn't explain the man at the top of the shot who is "upside down" the whole time. I assume that the key is that bowman was obscured by the pillar for a second there

>>213088539 (OP)
dishonest filmmaking

>>213089005
That's separate footage.
The take ends when he goes behind the pillar

>>213088539 (OP)
Guy sitting is belted into the chair and the wheel is rotated so he's upside down and the other guy can climb down. This scene is the real wtf.

>>213089052
this means nothing

>>213089005
He's strapped in

>>213089165
i dont remember how this scene goes but just looking at it, the bottom guy is laying on some hidden plank. if the bottom guy moves then idk

>>213089115
that's what I figured makes sense, still a flawless transition

>>213088539 (OP)
Magnet shoes. They are a thing you can buy and work pretty well. But you have to have strong legs so not a lot of people know about them.

>>213089228
He's not laying because he gets into the chair on the right.

>>213089298
It's a programmed shot. It's just the exact same pan and they filmed it twice. A lot of machine camera movement in this film.

Nolan did the same trick in Inception

>>213089052
It’s quite literally the most honest filmmaking.

anyone have that old spice commercial webm

>>213088539 (OP)
>>213088608
>>213088615
I don't know how they actually did it, but if I had to fake this without watching any production footage, I'd do two shots:

first with a vertical ladder at a 45 degree slope downward, so you could still climb down it and can still nevertheless stand up upon dismounting it, and you'd be standing at a 45 degree angle. The camera would be on a medal rack to hold it up, rotated at about a 90 degree angle.

You have the actor walk up down the hill, then up the opposite hill till he's occluded by the central column. As they cross about 90 degrees of the room, they're always being able to stand.

You composite the first shot parent-trap style with a second shot, which runs continuously throughout the first shot. You put this shot on the left side of the occlusion center column, and to film it you put the camera shot vertically above from a crane at the top of a similar doughnut.

The first shot ends when the actor walks behind the column, and the second shot has the actor enter frame at an appropriate cue so it looks like they walked from one side of the doughnut to the other: giving the illusion that two shots are one.

Total cost would be two half doughnut sets, a camera crane that supports rotation and significant height as needed, and the editor to composite the two shots.

>>213089411
They are never in space despite what they portray. What is honest about that?

>>213088539 (OP)
The entire set is technically what us Gen Xers know as a "gravitron", a fun carnival ride that spins at about 150mph to create a 2x gravity effect.

That's the most basic explanation, but it gets a lot more technical and complex when you get into the details.

>>213089371
No, motion control was only in the special effects ship models filmed frame by frame over a lengthy period. This is a real time shot by human hands, they just dangled Poole upside down 50 feet and told him to act natural.