oh no her butt is all dirty
>>213354023 (OP)why are japanese girls such bakas?
>>213354023 (OP)wearing a strangers underwear seems far less hygienic than dealing with mud in your own
>>213354298Ha ha imagine relate to that video except instead of falling in a puddle my dick doesnt get hard anymore and I have no friends lol
>>213354408Japanese pussies are very clean.
>>213354443better chop it off and troon out lmfao
>>213354023 (OP)In a culture dominated by shame how are whores not pressured to kill themselves?
>>213354023 (OP)If this was two White women on TikTok, /tv/ would be endlessly shitting on instead of looking it as some le heckin quirky chungus shit. You know it and I know it.
>>213354023 (OP)Japan has a panty culture, you just wouldn't understand.
>>213354857So what you're saying if it was completely different people would react different?
Made for modestly-sized white American cock
I think this might be Korean.
>>213355100What I'm saying is that yellow fever runs too rampant on this godforsaken site.
>>213355169You can tell because of the oblated epicanthic folds desu.
>>213355272Yellow fever? On a site for weebs? I don't believe it
>Japanese girl in dirty panties
>>213355272Yeah that makes sense, this is 4chan.org after all.
>>213355272it's even a normalfag thing now plus they rove whitu dicku
>>213354703Whores are shamed mainly in puritan anglo shitholes like the US.
we need more crotch shots in film
>>213355379how about a 2 hour and a half drama only consisting of closeup crotch shots of the characters?
>>213355063MAPS
THEY DON'T LOVE YOU LIKE I LOVE YOU
>>213355803https://youtu.be/Y3C2BsFSFzc?si=r-RVdUK0bBTwsBk1&t=615
>>213354023 (OP)Upskirt is a real genre in Nihon
>>213354703lol bitches rarely commit to suicide
>>213354703unforunately there are literally no downsides to being a whore
>>213354023 (OP)Reminder that this was directed by a woman
>>213354455i hear they keep an ell in there which eats the algae
>>213355169Why are Koreans and Jeets so much more susceptible to gravity, anons? Do they have lower levels of friction?
>>213354023 (OP)Hmmm, I will need to save this for further analysis.