Wow, I love the future so much! Look at how we can make these old boring movies good now!

Your outdated slop ain't disappearing, it's just being improved

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO NOT THE SACRED HOLLYWOOD MOVIES AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

>>213374125
we need to go further, someone needs to be playing one of those running games on another section of the screen

>>213374125
Wait, did they really put up a popup in the middle of the movie like that? That's gross

I mean it's a retarded show version of the movie only playing in one place on Earth. I can go watch a good copy of Wizard of Oz any time, it's an incredibly well-preserved movie.

The real evil is shit like blu-ray "remasters" like James Cameron's unforgivable AI slop. How the fuck he gave right the okay is beyond me. It looks like a SNES game fed through a filter.

>>213374079 (OP)
Who the fuck watches old movies? the only people in the theater are two fags in suits and some guy wearing a hat.
Is black space more immersive or is AI-generated backgrounds?

>>213374117
you ragebaiting faggot moron

>>213374181
looks like it

>>213374248
He knows the people doing it, he went through every frame. Trust him

>>213374125
Wow, PS4 graphics

>>213374248
Is the right not a shot of CGI Arnie from Genisys?

>>213374488
Legitimately, no. It's the filter the movie was fed through. A whole bunch of shitty de-noising and AI "enhancements" that butchered the entire thing. The amount of people who think film grain is a flaw is staggering.

>>213374079 (OP)
This is literally great, would further amaze the people who saw the original in the exact same style as they were amazed originally, and it’s also designed to be seen within the dome and not from an iPhone webm of somebody loosely filming one section of the screen

>>213374583
"Literally" great? Nah. But yes, it would impress people who saw it in technicolor, it's meant to be seen in a massive format. But seeing big trees in a massive format is not impressive to me in 2025, I grew up on IMAX movies.

>>213374079 (OP)
AI is satanic

>>213374644
Eh I’d give it a shot if I was in Vegas. Probably worth the price of admission and actually being in the dome

>>213374079 (OP)
>>213374125
So what exactly was done to the film?
Some kind of upscaling?

Indians think this looks good. Anytime you see anything in tech/media that is obviously tasteless and yet the people pushing it are clueless about it it means Indian hands are all over it.

Why do y'all cry about this but defend George Lucas for changing SW and making sure that no one gets to see the original?

>>213374714
They upscaled the film from 4:3 to a 360 degrees ultra high rez dome

>>213374746
Or boomers. Ridley Scott loves piss filters and James Cameron loves AI vaseline treatments.

>>213374785
I don’t think anyone defends George for that

>>213374079 (OP)
shoddy compositing of the actors onto a absolute shit-tier cg background, which only serves to make one acutely aware of how much worse it is than the unaltered original. how can anyone be impressed by this

>>213374785

When people crafted the term "whataboutism" as a rhetorical fallacy they meant posts like this

>>213374785
>y'all
go back faggot

>>213374706
I'd much rather see a big-format nature documentary tech demo like they had some big-wig shoot. Seeing blown-up AI-"created" backdrops for that price, for a movie I've already seen, fuck that.

>>213374822
chuds do

>>213374818
Don't forget Peter Jackson. I'm really glad he "restored" this documentary footage of The Beatles, it looks so good now!

>>213374785
Everyone hated the Special Editions and whatever edits he makes after.

>>213374841
No. The thread is about how one shouldn't use new technology to alter old movies. Chuds cry about using AI to change old movies, but they praise George Lucas for altering the original SW films with CGI. There is no fallacy in calling them out for this inconsistency.

>>213374956
Why lie?

>>213374956
I don't actually care about people changing old movies as long as the original is still readily available. If Ridley Scott's dementia-riddled ass wants to make Blade Runner: My Dick Cut where Deckard is actually just a figment of the audience's imagination, go ahead. I still have the versions of Blade Runner I like, and they're easily accessible.
This is where Lucas was actually the fucking worst, he actively went out of his way to bury older copies of Star Wars, and make it incredibly difficult for anyone to watch the originals. Any kid watching them on Disney Plus today (which is how most little shits absorb their Gisnep now) is getting a completely butchered version. Don't you think that's a little sad?

>>213374956
No. You are taking some unrelated activity, making up fictional strawmen, giving them fictional opinions, labeling those as my past opinions, and telling me what you made up now dictates my current opinion on this subject. That's a fallacy.

>>213374079 (OP)
Surely the people behind this realise it looks like utter dog shit, right? They didn't actually think this looks good?

>>213374385
For fuck sakes

>>213374845
Yeah probably would be better

>>213374956
Nobody defends Lucas for that dummy

The Wizard of Poz

>>213374714
They had pajeets add an UE5 rendered background to 90 percent of the screen space

>>213374920
Michael Mann outsourced the majority of his Ferrari movie to pajeets. There's an incredible ramped up scene (they love ramping) of a car crash with 486 era physics

>>213375015
He didn't bury any copies of the "originals" (assuming you mean the VHS, the theatrical 1977 release had four different versions depending on the type of theater so there was no single original). He never impeded their distribution.
Why would I think it's sad that a writer gets to finish his book, or an artist his sketch? It was his movie, it's not done until he decides to, not the fans.

>>213375098
Give it a few generations. People laughed at horse armor DLC, zoomers think you're abnormal if you don't buy digital (((content))). The biggest propaganda thing in 1984 is rewriting the past. You can take something innocuous like Silent Hill 2 and how it got the UE5 treatment and apply it to politics, history etc. You could easily make alphas think that Kennedy never got shot and that he went ass to ass with Frank Sinatra to promote gay rights.

>>213375165
Chuds constantly make threads defending him for this, chud.

>>213375234
Why do you lie? He even made it part of his contract with Disney that they are never allowed to release the original, unaltered versions.

>>213375252
>zoomers think you're abnormal if you don't buy digital (((content)))
Source: your ass? Everyone shits on microtransactions.

>>213375171
heh

>>213375165
>>213375254
I already was proven right. Here is a chud defending it: >>213375234

>>213375290
>originals
Which of the 4 theatrical versions is the original, exactly?
I did not lie. I said he didn't bury the VHS, and that's true. It's not illegal to buy them or own them. I'm sorry the writer won't reprint the early unfinished draft of his novel bro, that's so sad or something.

>>213374181
It's a trailer I believe

>>213375391
If so, it still looks retarded like a website popup ad and not an actual good transition to the next ad.

>>213374248
>>b-b-b-but I need to see every hair and pore on daddy muscleman's skin!
Tell your therapist. Nobody else is interested.

This is the exact kind of shit that people would have loved in 1935.

>>213374536
> The amount of people who think film grain is a flaw is staggering.
Exactly. Film grain is so comfy on the eyes. I love putting on an old show or movie at night to ease me into bedtime mode.

>>213375735
This stutterer who immediately thinks about gay sex is right!

>>213374079 (OP)
posted it again award

>>213374167
subway surfers

>>213374583
SAAAAAR

>>213375874
lmao

>>213375252
>alphas
They're called megazoomers

So this is what was meant by India becoming a superpower.