>>213480262 (OP)TWBB is obviously better.
First, its mostly original (only the drilling taken from Oil) and has PTAs style all over it (and its his best movie). Where as No Country is a strict novel adaptation which is deliberately stripped of the Coen Brother’s style (and Miller’s Crossing is better). From an artistic standpoint, I give more props to an artist achieving his unique creative apex rather than creating a “perfect” recreation of someone elses’ work.
Secondly, its idiosyncratic. It has music and cinematography unlike anything else, its storytelling choices are very unique and “PTA” (like the opening which doesnt show Daniel’s one-legged crawl back to town, which Tarantino talks about)
Thirdly, its a timeless portrait of the world in which we live. Much like Citizen Kane, its a character and story that can be endlessly talked about and applied to all aspects of people and life. No Country is a fine “no nonsense” thriller with a stripped down style. Its themes are similarly timeless like TWBB, but the style of story makes it feel much more about a time and place where as TWBB feels more mythological and archetypal, like Kane and Lawrence of Arabia and other great movies.
TWBB is simply the more impressive and unique artistic achievement. When I think of “what artistic achievements has American cinema achieved in the 2000s?” I instantly think of TWBB. If I were to think of adaptations, I would think of LOTR before No Country.