>>213502715 (OP)>>213502911It's not "money laundering" its that if you just shut it down all the money you already spent on it was wasted, but if you finish it and put it out in theaters it will at least make SOME money, so you just have to make a judgment call and ask which will result in a smaller loss
1. costs you already spent on the movie (lost if you shut it down)
2. costs you already spent on the movie + costs to finish the movie - expected revenue
If 2 results in a lower number then it makes more sense to finish and release it even if you know the movie sucks and will probably not make its money back. Plus sometimes bad movies can be unexpectedly successful, so producers remain hopeful that it might still pay off.
Studios also take into consideration what their revenues are for that year and may want to wait to realize losses. Financial losses will offset income for the company's tax burden. But this is only for profits and losses from that year, and if losses exceed profits they don't owe any taxes. So they may have a movie done that the studio doesn't believe in, and thinks will bomb, so they wait a year or two to release it because they want to time it right to offset their profits.