Was Lynch right? - /tv/ (#213504320) [Archived: 13 hours ago]

Anonymous
8/8/2025, 10:22:44 PM No.213504320
1754583878735578
1754583878735578
md5: 297d2ae2e7eb9be2a0bd7a984bcf17cc🔍
Replies: >>213504643 >>213505534
Anonymous
8/8/2025, 10:28:02 PM No.213504479
i'm not reading allat
Anonymous
8/8/2025, 10:33:53 PM No.213504643
>>213504320 (OP)
its a fucking shame we will never find out what lynch would have done with ai tools.

he loved photoshop and was always technology friendly. which is weird when you consider his paintings.
Replies: >>213504929
Anonymous
8/8/2025, 10:44:43 PM No.213504929
>>213504643
This
Anonymous
8/8/2025, 11:03:45 PM No.213505517
Soon there will be an AI Filmmaking thread on /tv/ mark my words. The anons writing scripts will realise sooner or later that they can create their films.
Anonymous
8/8/2025, 11:04:20 PM No.213505534
>>213504320 (OP)
Tard was a perverted sex cultist and a scammer, who the fuck cares. Literal Pajeet.
Anonymous
8/8/2025, 11:53:36 PM No.213506862
AI pajeets have been posting this same thread for days now
Anonymous
8/9/2025, 12:50:27 AM No.213508500
When i look at the porn threads it's clear to me which images have a drive, an idea behind them, they look much better and lively. I can even tell from the thumbnail for how clearly this intent come through the image.
Though i've also adopted a habit of scrolling these threads without opening a single picture since so many of them are disposable. Utterly disposable content, the democratization of things always lead to a tsunami of bad product, look at open source software. There's a lot of shit done by people who don't care so no thanks for facilitating that.