What was the joke in this scene? Genuinely asking.
>>>/wsg/5943830

For me, it's the hair due and the sound of opening the bottle of water.

>>213517307 (OP)
Conservative grifters, like Kirk, use dishonest arguments to try to "own" college kids so they can scam retarded righoids into giving them money

>>213517343
What is dishonest about his argument in this scene? Be very specific

>>213517324
looks like Matt’s hair, and uhhh criticizing a hair “due” idk if Trey’s really the guy to do that

Funniest thing about it was Clyde, the water bottle and how bored he is by his own arguments. E-celebs often sound like they can’t get excited about their own ideas which is telling.

>>213517307 (OP)
There's no joke you're just supposed to already think he's bad therefore any portrayal of him is mocking him

>>213517421
>Clyde
It was implied he was raped at Mar a lago, right?

>>213517343
>grifter
All your takes on these guys us that they're fake and don't believe what they're saying. It's like you can't accept that anyone can think differently from you. It's very parochial and low iq.

Abortion is good. Nothing is suffering when a child is aborted.

>>213517343
>it is the right that is known for not acting in good faith
yep, its troontime

>>213517307 (OP)
Do they mock his gum?

>>213517355
He never answers her question, he just brings up government laws as justification for enacting more government laws.

>>213517559
The question was answered.

>>213517559
>justification for enacting more government laws.
Wut? His response was about consistency in application of current law logic.

>>213517307 (OP)
South Park is now "making fun" of no name youtube podcast e celebs now? This is so fucking pathetic and gay, who tf watches this shit still?

>>213517559

>>213517592
>>213517615
She asked what gives him the right to regulate her body, and he responds with regulations about her body.

It's not really complicated.

>>213517355
Most pro-choice feminists don't actually support charging murders of pregnant women as a double murder specifically because they don't recognize the personhood of a unborn fetus and see it as legally undermining abortion that way.

>>213517660
His response was to to use the applied existing law and logic in one instance in another.

Cartoon boy is doing thing from twitter
You saw political thing on twitter, you get the reference, yes?
That's the "joke"

>>213517307 (OP)
they make fun of both sides

>>213517660
So you have no argument?

>>213517421
>E-celebs
We’re literally called influencers

>>213517943
>We're
Nobody likes you, kirk.

>>213517695
Can you produce one example of this?