Anyone who gives a movie 0/10 cannot be trusted

i rate OP 0/10, but 15/10 faggot

>>213609229 (OP)
There are definitely 0/10 films, but 8mm is far from one of them
Side note, I think the negative reaction that movie received is entirely down to its graphic content, which was less acceptable in mainstream stuff at the time. If that movie came out now it would be critically acclaimed or at least get an average score

>>213609229 (OP)
Meet our movie review staff, Goldstein, Goldberg, Silverman, Greenberg and Shekelberg. All fully qualified with media literacy degrees from the Rothschild Institute.

>>213609334
It was quite an interesting cast, a surprising number of recognizable faces
Though I suppose outside of the subject matter it was nothing special
I would still give it a 7 something

If you don't give a 5/10 to an average film then you cannot be trusted
>no 5/10 is too low for an ok film, giving anything lower than 5 to anything that isn't complete garbage is le mean
Femoid logic

>>213609434
I feel people no longer understand how a rating scale is meant to work
If 3/5 isn’t your baseline for average quality, your scale is shit

>0
Dropped.
>1
Watchable albeit not particularly good nor bad.
>2
The movie was good.

This is literally the only scoring system worth shit. Anyone using a 10 points system is a factual retard.

>>213609560
The average should always be the middle point. Anything else is "I don't want to be mean" retardation

>>213609434
I have an 11/10 rating system with imaginary 11 or 10+ for like 5 if my most favourite films that are better than a masterpiece hold personal sentimental value