Is this anything like Snatch or Lock Stock? Why was it hated?

>>213649387 (OP)
it like Snatch or Lock Stock was made by a washed out director 20+ years after his prime
it's good, but only if you never compare it to his better works

>>213649387 (OP)
I think it's great, it's not the same as snatch or lock stock but it has it's own charm. I'd say, despite being different, they're all top tier. I don't get the hate/negativity this movie gets
>>213649472
>it's good, but only if you never compare it
that means it's not good, because you always need a reference to compare it to
what did you not like about it?

>>213649724
>you always need a reference
No, you don't.

>>213649387 (OP)
it was 2 minutes, 5 minutes ago

>>213649777
then how do you know what is good or not if you don't know what is bad?
>ignoring the question
so you're just baiting?

>>213649387 (OP)
Too arrogantly. Also - repeat scenes from other movies (Pulp Fiction - say English, as example).

>>213649821
>how do you know what is good or not
its a thing called taste. you either have it or you don't.

>did he just call me a black cunt?

>>213650885
>ESL
>terrible opinion
pottery

This movie sure would be decent if it wasn't rendered completely drooling retarded by being about weed being illegal in 2025. Make it cocaine you boomer fucking retard, get a fucking grip

>>213649387 (OP)
unironically hugh grant is terrible and makes all his scenes terrible.

It's like a cool guy competition where every contestant is trying to one up the rest.

>>213649387 (OP)
Its more like rocknrolla but ups the contrived cringe stuff. On the other hand its oddly anti jewish and chink which is nice

>>213651965
It is illegal though