How hard will /tv/ seethe when he is announced as the new James Bond?

>>213675297 (OP)
*BLOCKS YOUR PATH*

>>213675297 (OP)
A Jewish Bond is appropriate.

>>213675297 (OP)
Bezos will be Bond

>>213675297 (OP)
I genuinely don't care. I don't think he's a particularly great choice but I don't think he's bad either.

>>213675367
>oh heck Mr. M, i don't know how i could do this mission because womanizing is so heckin problematic!

>>213675421
He's a great choice for Bond and has all it takes BUT it's pointless since DUNC guy is directing and the moron who burdened the world with Peaky Blinders is writing the script. It's never been more DOA than this.

>Giving a shit about Bond after the last 4 films

It really does not matter. They've been trying to stir up hype and circulate rumors about all the different actors being considered for Bond for a decade now. There have been thousands of clickbait articles 'unofficially announcing' the new Bond. Who fucking cares at this point? They may very well spend another 7 years deliberating and 'announcing a new frontrunner' every fucking week. I do not give a fuck if it's Holland, Taylor-Johnson, Cavill, or any of the other 15 fucking names they keep throwing around. There hasn't been a good Bond movie since 2006 and overall the franchise has a pretty low batting average for putting out actually good movies. Just put a British guy in a suit, get him buzzed, and make him punch henchmen and seduce a woman, it really does not matter who he is at this point.

What kind of architecture is this?

>>213675574
It really is inexcusable for a franchise of Bond's status to have put out only 2 movies in 10 years.