What was his problem?

>>213708172 (OP)
Feeling a bit peckish

>>213708172 (OP)
I think Nazis ate his sister or something. Or fed her to him. Sketchy on the details because that book was shit designed to take the piss out of people for wanting MOAR HECKIN' BASED LECTER

>>213708172 (OP)
Why so many Silence of the lambs threads?

>>213708246
Swept the big five at the Oscars.

>>213708172 (OP)
Only that he slipped up and got caught. He talked a pedophile into cutting his own face off and he got rid of that substandard violin player. He made the world a better place in ways both large and small.

>>213708172 (OP)
He's smart enough to realize he can be a predator in a world full of prey

>>213708172 (OP)
He was too based.

>>213708172 (OP)
>Nothing happened to me, Officer Starling. I happened. You can’t reduce me to a set of influences. You’ve give up good and evil behaviorism, Officer Starling. You’ve got everybody in moral dignity pants -- nothing is ever anybody’s fault.

btw I know the lady who did those drawings

>>213708172 (OP)
In prison for what he did to Moner.

>>213708272
I thought that was Bill that killed the violin player

>>213708310
>but uh, doctor lecter shir, leibniz tells us that everything must have a reason or cause for its existence, occurrence, or state of being. That every fact, event, or entity, has an explanation that is sufficient to account for why it is the way it is and not otherwise.
>upheld by schopenhauer, shir

What was his fucking problem?

The prequels are shite, right?

>>213708373
lecter killed a flautist, i thought

>>213708244
Iirc they ate his sister and made him eat some too. So he went back and killed/ate all of them. But like you said goddamn what a shit book, movie is even worse.

>>213708330
>i wasted time trying to find that clip online but couldnt

>>213708434
Red Dragon is alrighte

>>213708330
>>213708475
what clip

>>213708442
wasn't that the same guy whose head was in the jar that Clarice found. Lector said he didn't kill him.

I could be wrong but in the book, Lector did kill him, but they changed some of the details for the movie. They didn't catch those changes when they wrote the sequels based on those books and so a plot hole popped up.

>>213708502
>I could be wrong but in the book, Lector did kill him, but they changed some of the details for the movie
You're probably right.

>>213708498
there's a clip of Anthony Hopkins getting hugsy with very cute Moner.

>>213708434
I enjoyed Red Dragon as a flick if your bored

>>213708442
Why would he kill a guy for farting that’s just silly

>>213708591
It's probably the best movie that hack Brett Ratner ever directed, but I guess it's because the cast carries hard.

>>213708621
>farting
>not rude

>>213708621
He killed him for ruining his tempo

>>213708586
Nobody should go to prison for that

>>213708666
Thanks Satan, finally someone who watched the movie. But what if he killed the guy and they hired an even worse flautist?

>>213708434
Manhunter is great

>>213708688
abusing your power and getting handsy with vulnerable young actresses is not legal.

>>213708840
it's just some innocent Latina snuggling

>>213708789
second course.

>>213708172 (OP)
the rude and corrupt hypocrites became intolerable

I love Lecter, he's such a cool character
The movie is peak destilled cinema
The book drags around, it goes oon and oon, it's a bit of a chore
The movie just perfectly captures everything that needs to be there, it's only crime is cutting too much of the gore,I think it could use 10% more gruesome, just a notch, movie is just a little too watered down

How would the original lecter have done in silence in the lambs?

>>213709455
Don't know, he was much more unhinged in here. You can see the years in confinement are killing him inside.

>>213709296
I never got the praise. For me it's a 6/10 movie, Lecter is too cartoonish for my taste.

>>213708172 (OP)
Missed his Key Auntie and Father Beans

>>213709542

>>213708172 (OP)
autism

>>213708246
Because I can smell your cunt.

>>213708172 (OP)
post the edit now, please
>>213708421
>do you see?