Thread 213783374 - /tv/ [Archived: 68 hours ago]

Anonymous
8/18/2025, 8:51:48 AM No.213783374
1754923077376173
1754923077376173
md5: dd5ea8a7c273ed6c67c69221413788ce🔍
It wasn't supposed to be a documentary.
Replies: >>213783424 >>213783442 >>213783502
Anonymous
8/18/2025, 8:54:19 AM No.213783424
>>213783374 (OP)
Strawman.
Replies: >>213783582
Anonymous
8/18/2025, 8:55:18 AM No.213783442
>>213783374 (OP)
What's sad is that people will never accept that this applies to both sides
Replies: >>213783453 >>213783499 >>213783524 >>213783603 >>213783669
Anonymous
8/18/2025, 8:56:03 AM No.213783453
>>213783442
Are you a nazi or a troon? Pick one.
Replies: >>213783754
Anonymous
8/18/2025, 8:57:25 AM No.213783482
retards to left of me retards to the right. None of them are alright.
Replies: >>213783496
Anonymous
8/18/2025, 8:58:09 AM No.213783496
>>213783482
yeah like ur some god ur not my boss ur not my fathR fuck off
Anonymous
8/18/2025, 8:58:28 AM No.213783499
>>213783442
>both sides
of what? anti-porn is bipartisan
Replies: >>213783754
Anonymous
8/18/2025, 8:58:34 AM No.213783502
>>213783374 (OP)
based marge
Anonymous
8/18/2025, 8:59:41 AM No.213783524
>>213783442
What? Direction brains are so fucking annoying lol.
Replies: >>213783636
Anonymous
8/18/2025, 9:03:16 AM No.213783582
fuck pro-censorship fags

>>213783424
name one instance of censorship that's acceptable, other than to protect people/lives
Replies: >>213784057
Anonymous
8/18/2025, 9:04:52 AM No.213783603
>>213783442
huh
Anonymous
8/18/2025, 9:07:12 AM No.213783636
>>213783524
(Youerts)
Replies: >>213783677
Anonymous
8/18/2025, 9:08:59 AM No.213783669
>>213783442
Especially the people who wrote that episode. I can guarantee they would have capped free speech at hate speech, especially back then. But yes, personally I think it extends to both hate speech and obscenity.
Anonymous
8/18/2025, 9:09:44 AM No.213783677
>>213783636
Your mom Cheryl Harris sucked a fart outta my ass.
Replies: >>213783953 >>213783953
Anonymous
8/18/2025, 9:14:04 AM No.213783754
>>213783453
At this point I should just screencap replies like this one and save them in a little folder. Literally the kind of replies you find on twitter and bluesky, or also on some /co/ threads.

>>213783499
Exactly, but why? Feminists got offended with games like Dragon's Crown, and started to act very retarded. Remember that liking sexy women is bad! At least the based opposition wanted to end their censorship, right? Nope, because liking sexy women is satanic! And we're just talking about sexual content, but there's more. The faggot that posted that is probably just talking about the recent censorship. If so, then he's a retarded hypocrite
Anonymous
8/18/2025, 9:26:02 AM No.213783953
>>213783677
>>213783677
FUCK. OFF. NOW!!!
Anonymous
8/18/2025, 9:33:45 AM No.213784057
>>213783582
>name one instance of censorship that's acceptable,
>other than to protect people/lives
Thanks for including that little loophole that basically can be exploited anytime
>This thing contains imagery/joke that I dont like, im gonna claim it causes emotional damage to x group and they might off themselves because of it so we can pull it off air