>>213788872>>213788900You are the worst type of faggot.
>Singular 'they' has existed for centuries'They' was only used for unknown or generic people ('If someone forgets their bag'). Using it for a specific, known person (like that ugly fuck) is a modern twist, not how English naturally worked before, dumbass.
>It doesn’t make communication le harderIt does moron. If I say, 'Bella said they’re coming,' is that one person or multiple? English already struggles with unclear pronouns (like 'you' for both singular and plural). Forcing 'they' for known individuals makes sentences ambiguous.
>I-it’s about respect, like using the right nameNames are unique identifiers, but pronouns are functional grammar. If we let everyone demand any pronoun, communication breaks down.
>It just takes practice to get used to :)Fuck off. Even supporters of this shit often slip up and default to 'he' or 'she' without thinking. It doesn’t come naturally. Have you thought that maybe it’s not a practical solution, it's just an ideological one?
Singular 'they' for unknown people is old grammar, but applying it to specific individuals is new and awkward and RETARDED. Language needs clarity and forcing 'they' for known people causes more confusion than it solves. KYS NIGGER